2006/4/20, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta(a)gmail.com>:
On 4/20/06, Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)j2solutions.net> wrote:
> But what about when the Fedora Red Hat "ships" is an amalgum of some
> packages within the Universe (I hate this word)? Is it only a REAL
> Fedora when it comes out of Red Hat?
Things reviewed and blessed by the Fedora Board get access to the more
restricted marks. As in a live-cd that the board reviews and blesses..
gets access to the more restricted marks and don't need to claim
"based on". but can still claim "based on." A livecd thats been
built
from Core+Extras sources but not reviewed/blessed by the board must
use "based on" and uses the less restricted mark.
If Red Hat wants to ship an amalgum that doesn't get reviewed and
blessed by the Fedora Board... then no.. they dont get to use the more
restricted mark... neener neener neener.
hi |jef|
i think thats a pretty good idea of dealing with things in a fair way.
but just a question... what if i add a single package that isnt yet in
extras nor core... am i not allowed to call it "based on fedora" with
only minor changes that are documented in a clean way?
with having a distro that is 99,9% fedora (e.g. a live cd... e.g. with
distcc...) wouldnt it be still based on fedora from a pure technical
point of view?
How would i be able to call that live cd then?
regards,
Rudolf Kastl
-jef
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list