On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:47:16PM -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Paul W. Frields
<stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Let me see if I can do a bit of a rewrite of this statement. What I
> thought we agreed in the meeting was that we wanted people to take a
> look at *our* prospective talking points, and comment on them, adding
> where necessary. This is subtly different than having a wide-open
> blank slate in terms of gaining consensus, but important.
>
> We also need to be clear about how the talking points will be decided,
> i.e. the list is limited in size, and the Marketing team will make the
> final calls necessary. This will prevent someone being surprised if
> his or her particular favorite point ultimately isn't used.
>
> I had thought the table Mel was creating was going to codify the
> groups of points we'd already zeroed in on as a group (both in the
> previous page version and suggested changes on the list). Will the
> current format of the page support better consensus, or is it
> operating more as a blank slate?
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 02:16:14PM -0800, bhutto aamir wrote:
>> TalkingPoints are key features of the new release that we want to
>> point out they are meant to answer the question "so what cool stuff
>> is in the latest release of Fedora?" So we are inviting *everyone*
>> active/inactive to participate in writing the talking points of
>> "Fedora 13"
>>
>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Talking_Points
>>
>> Feel free to add-in features that you think should be a talking
>> point and the reasons( if you see a feature and want it to be a
>> talking point, put down the reasons why ) You can follow the Talking
>> point SOP
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talking_Points_SOP if you
>> want to know how we are making talking points for Fedora 13.
>
> Here's my take:
> * * *
>
> Talking points are key highlights of the new release. There are
> different types of talking points for different types of people:
> general desktop users/everyone, developers, and sysadmins. They are
> meant to provide a short, effective answer to the question "What cool
> stuff is in the latest release of Fedora?" They are compelling, not
> necessarily comprehensive
>
> Tge Marketing team compiles a short list of approximately three
> talking points for each of these audiences for an upcoming release.
> For Fedora 13, they're found here:
>
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Talking_Points
>
> If you have a talking point that you feel meets the criteria found on
> the talking points SOP page at
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talking_points_SOP, please add it to
> the the table on the F13 page with supporting information.
I don't know if we talked at all about this in the marketing meeting,
but: Do we want to be more specific about encouraging ONLY wiki
postings of additional talking points, or also allow postings to the
fedora-mktg mailing list?
It's not really specified in the SOP (at least that I can find in a
fairly quick glance). If we want to head off the world's longest email
thread, should we specify not emailing the list?
Great point, Robyn. Having to track multiple areas of input is really
hard -- case in point, my email of potential changes here instead of
just editing the wiki. ;-) How about adding:
"Please make your changes to the wiki page, so that the Marketing team
can efficiently capture and consider your input."
> The Marketing team will make final adjustments to the list of
talking
> points at their meeting on February 23, which will be announced on the
> marketing list and is open to everyone.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Where open source multiplies:
http://opensource.com