2006/4/20, Andre Nogueira <andre.nogueira.fedora(a)gmail.com>:
On 4/20/06, Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)j2solutions.net> wrote:
>
> That is no longer based on Fedora. That includes parts of Fedora, but
> adds to it, and thus cannot be claimed to be Fedora. Get the package in
> Extras (;
That also solves the problem of a distro wanting to use proprietary
software (which isn't acceptable in Fedora), while the rest is based
on Fedora. (Eg, a distro which includes Acrobat Reader, but appart
from that only includes Fedora packages).
Otherwise, how would you distinguish an "almost" Fedora-based distro
which includes proprietary packages, from another which includes free
packages that are not in Fedora or Fedora Extras?
Thanks,
Andre
well that was exactly my question... what terms are "legal"... i am
neither a lawyer nor do i want to consult one at this point :).
regards,
Rudolf Kastl
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list