On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Dimitris Glezos wrote:
O/H Nicolas Mailhot έγραψε:
> Le dimanche 09 juillet 2006 à 11:35 +0530, Tejas Dinkar a écrit :
>> Hey, I was reading dfong's blog, and I found she has made a huge
>> collection of brilliant Fedora Wallpapers, that are liscenced under the
>> Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License
>
> ...
>
>> My question is, should/do we have a page on the wiki dedicated to stuff
>> like this?
>
> IMHO as long as the licensing is compatible, it should all end in a
> fedora-extras package
I believe that the CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License of
Diana's work is not compatible because of the Non commercial and No
derivatives clauses.
We could ask her to consider dual-licencing the wallpapers under the FDL
or something compatible.
Heh. Licensing, content, and RPMs. A fascinating topic. :)
We don't yet have a clear policy for licensing of artwork. The Fedora
logo, for instance, *cannot* itself be licensed because it's a trademark
that we want to protect.
But what does that mean for projects that seek to reuse that artwork?
Makes it very difficult.
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project ||
fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador ||
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------