2006/4/20, Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)j2solutions.net>:
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 20:03 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> but just a question... what if i add a single package that isnt yet in
> extras nor core... am i not allowed to call it "based on fedora" with
> only minor changes that are documented in a clean way?
> with having a distro that is 99,9% fedora (e.g. a live cd... e.g. with
> distcc...) wouldnt it be still based on fedora from a pure technical
> point of view?
> How would i be able to call that live cd then?
That is no longer based on Fedora. That includes parts of Fedora, but
adds to it, and thus cannot be claimed to be Fedora. Get the package in
Extras (;
but its still derived from fedora isnt it? distcc is hanging idle in
bugzilla for ages :)
someone finish the review.
regards,
Rudolf Kastl
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (
geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (
www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (
geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBER84+4v2HLvE71NURAvs8AJ9rRMEFj7UlWdPFSfuOFkwZc1HfiQCgvL/Z
F7w4E343p6FGl6TEZjrxejc=
=Efy5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list