I believe it has already been established that there will be no hat.
However there should be some art. The logo should not appear to have
been created using a vector based 2D CAD application with color fill.
And where is the warmth?
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 13:37 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
Heh heh heh! So it's hit the masses with full force!
"The logo isn't at all appealing. Looks very amateur. No offence but
according to the Wiki project, it's been getting rave reviews? Someone
hand me a baseball bat. I'm no designer but this is way off."
"As lukewarm as I am about the current proposals, have you seen some of
the other ideas put forward? Yikes!"
"I prefer the Blue Fedora hat."
"The 'attractiveness' component is lacking. Maybe more rounded, more
attractive colors, etc. It looks too much like broken links."
So Matt, more grist for the mill. At this point I think we're pretty far
down the acceptance path, though.
--g
(p.s. I understand that there's a lot you can do with fonts.)
_____________________ ____________________________________________
Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent. the
Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the
] [ dumb. --mcluhan