Hello,
This is a pretty confusing decision to take.
Since last week in the Fedora Live-CDs, there were talks and more
confusion about it.
see
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-livecd-list/2006-April/msg00110.html
and related talks about it.
They are highly useful if (as Max said) we are choosing the idea of
having two marks
Chitlesh GOORAH
On 4/20/06, Max Spevack <mspevack(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Howdy folks,
The Fedora board needs help with a policy decision.
As Fedora evolves, we'll be seeing more and more custom distributions that
are spun from the Fedora Universe of packages. Kadischi-based Live CDs
are a good example. We'd like to be able to allow these distributions to
use the Fedora name -- and we've got tentative buy-in from legal to do it
-- so long as the distros are built entirely from Fedora (Core+Extras)
packages.
So. How should the Fedora brand be used in such cases?
Let's say, for example, that Rex Dieter builds a minimal Fedora distro
that has KDE and no GNOME -- and he wants to call it "KDExcellent". He
also wants people to know that it's derived from official Fedora packages.
Should we let him call it:
+ Fedora KDExcellent?
+ KDExcellent, based on Fedora?
+ KDExcellent, a Fedora distribution?
Whatever policy we come up with now, we'll be stuck with for quite a
while -- so we could use some help.
Thanks in advance for your ideas.
--Max
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
--
http://clunixchit.blogspot.com