On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Clair wrote:
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 21:30, Max Spevack wrote:
> Is it really special treatment? Special treatment, in my mind, would be
> putting a vendor to the top of the list because they offered us a
> kickback. Special treatment implies "shady dealings". I don't see
this
> proposal as being special treatment at all. Karlie is voluteering to
> offer a service that *none* of the other vendors are offering, and we are
> acknowledging that. It's not like she is the *only* vendor who can do
> this. Wouldn't it be wonderful if all of our vendors believed so strongly
> in Fedora that they wanted to do the same thing?
Ah, but until recently one of the vendors was also giving away free media.
I did not know that. In what way did we differentiate them from the other
vendors who were not?
--Max
--
Max Spevack <mspevack{at}redhat.com> gpg key: mspevack.asc
http://people.redhat.com/mspevack/ fingerprint: 5A17 CF21