On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 20:19 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>
> but its still derived from fedora isnt it? distcc is hanging idle in
> bugzilla for ages :)
> someone finish the review.
>
No, because (as Max forgot to mention) the Based on Fedora must be based
on the Binary packages, not rebuilds of the source packages. No
published Binary, can't use it.
That's a good point. People have to use the same binaries, signed by
Fedora/Red Hat if they want to be "official". We can't trust people to
not mess them up or do weird stuff if they rebuild from source.
--
Max Spevack
+ gpg key --
http://people.redhat.com/~mspevack/mspevack.asc
+ fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21