----- Original Message -----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/10/2014 09:54 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> Matthew Miller píše v Čt 10. 04. 2014 v 10:11 -0400:
>> This is probably old hat to some of the social media experts
>> here, but I found it enlightening, especially in light of recent
>> comments about our presence there.
>> <
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9ZqXlHl65g>
>>
>> It certainly mirrors my experience with the Facebook group --
>> lots of members, but very low engagement.
Just FYI we have three points of presence on FB (at least):
The Facebook *Group*:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/Fedora.linux/
The Facebook Fedora Community Folks *group*:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/127560783969535/
And the Fedora Linux *Page*:
https://www.facebook.com/TheFedoraProject
This is, IMHO, confusing - so let's be sure we're talking about the
same things.
Yes, it is confusing. On the other hand, it can be used for good.
Especially that Community folks vs rest. When I share important milestones
on FB, I do it only in the community folks group. There's not need
to confuse users, I really want to reach different target audience.
On the other hand, with more generic posts, I always struggle where
to post... And for people looking for Fedora presence on FB it can
be really confusing which one they should pick up. But as you know,
I usually like more options with a good explanation. Maybe changing
"about" messages for all these groups/pages could help.
R.