On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 08:31:59PM -0600, William Moreno wrote:
> > What should it be?
Something simple like Fedora Devel can work
+1. Didn't we get rid of release codenames for a reason? Why come up
with a silly codename rather than calling it something straightforward
like "Fedora Development". Although I do kinda like "Fedora Now",
and
that avoids the disadvantage of the possible confusing ways of
interpreting "Fedora Development"--is that the name of the release, or
a reference to the process of development itself?