On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:17:37AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 07:29:02AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> My main question was more around opening the door to a Fedora
> publication to opinion pieces, and what might that lead to down the road.
>
> * Do we accept any opinion pieces?
>
> * Is there a process to saying "uh, sorry - we don't think this meets
> our standards?"
I think this needs to be more of an editorial space than a
letters-to-the-editor section. I think anything we run needs to:
1) Aim to advance our overall mission,
2) be in line with and promote the Fedora foundations, and
3) obviously, but let's say it: follow the Fedora code of conduct.
I don't know if we need more process than just saying that and trusting our
submitters and editors; I hope we don't.
I've no qualms about having this kind of opinion piece. I did want to
say that I think Fedora Magazine on the whole should retain a
user-centric slant, and not get too focused on internal community
issues.
This doesn't mean I'm against running this article. In the larger
view I would like to avoid having too many of such articles. The
magazine could easily become less interesting over time to wider
audiences if that happened.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow:
http://opensource.com