On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 12:31 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:52:39PM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
<snip>
Agreed, an overarching, authoritative strategy, written down and
maintained, would help a lot for these types of discussions and
supporting work.
<snip>
There are already quite a few searchable bits in the source behind
the page. We could of course work with those without affecting the
content. But doing so without clearly supporting a coherent strategy
probably isn't going to have a huge effect on Fedora's popularity.
I also don't think anyone's saying the website is deficient -- IMHO
it's the best it's been in a *long* time. I'm all for improving or
reworking the content to be fresh, timely, and high value. It
needn't be an artificial function of trying to "game" SEO. Maybe we
should start with the authoritative written strategy mentioned above.
I just wanted to put my .02 in that this discussion sounds like a
valuable one. I am glad to see everyone trying to find a happy balance
between 'get it done' and 'red tape rules', but at the same time
seeking structure for the sake of guiding decisions and enabling
volunteers to 'do stuff'.
~ Charles