There is one reason for using ow.ly URL shortener and that is it allows the
person posting via hootsuite to track engagement with a post. I would
rather see a URL shortener that is fedora branded being used if possible.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015, 8:02 PM Ryan Lerch <rlerch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 11/11/2015 10:53 AM, Chaoyi Zha wrote:
Yes, I'm aware that it is passed through t.co. If it counts the links as
the same amount of characters, we might still want to keep the shortened
URLs for aesthetics, as long links don't look very good on mobile.
IMHO, a full link is more aesthetically appealing than a bunch of random
characters, and more usable too -- you know what you are clicking on before
you click it. Twitter, even though it passes thrrough their shortener, will
display a portion (if not all) of the link in the timeline, rather than the
shortened link.
Unless you have a specific objection to using a shortener, I'm assuming.
my objections to using link shorteners are pretty much summed up by this
article:
http://oleb.net/blog/2012/08/please-dont-use-url-shorteners-on-twitter/
regards,
ryanlerch
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015, 7:48 PM Ryan Lerch <rlerch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/11/2015 10:34 AM, Ryan Lerch wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2015 10:03 AM, Chaoyi Zha wrote:
>
> Hi Ryan,
>
> I think the use of a link shortener is adequate for Twitter. This is
> because they have a character limit, and using a shortener greatly helps
> increase the amount of text you can have in a tweet. Twitter counts your
> link's characters even though it passes it through its own link gateway.
>
> This is incorrect -- try crafting a new tweet on
twitter.com with 115
> characters, then add a link with more that 25 characters -- it will let you
> post it. All links on twitter go through the t.co link shortener.
>
> cheers,
> ryanlerch
>
>
> Cheers,
> Chaoyi
>
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 at 19:01 Ryan Lerch <rlerch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just wondering what people think about not using any link shorteners on
>> the official Fedora twitter feed. Twitter actually passes all links in
>> tweets through their own t.co/ link shortener, so using another one is
>> just (IMHO) unnecessarily obfuscating the link from our followers on
>> twitter. (twitter presents all t.co links as the full text, but the link
>> itself is t.co)
>>
>> Looking back through the feed, the main link shortener being used is
>> ow.ly, which i assume is being done by whoever is using Hootsuite.
>>
>> cheers,
>> ryanlerch
>> --
>> marketing mailing list
>> marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> List info or to change your subscription:
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Also, have a look at this tweet:
>
>
https://twitter.com/fedora/status/664172103525146624
>
> If you inspect the link in that tweet, (or copy the link address to see
> the href of it), you will see that the link is actaully t.co. So these
> links are passing through t.co, then redundantly redirecting on to ow.ly,
> then on to the actual site we want.
>
> cheers,
> ryanlerch
> --
> marketing mailing list
> marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> List info or to change your subscription:
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
--
marketing mailing list
marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
List info or to change your subscription:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing