packaging May 2020

packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org

7 participants
13 discussions

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-08-15 16:00 UTC)
by James Antill 18 Jul '21

18 Jul '21

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2019-08-15 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): ================= Day: Thursday ================== 2019-08-15 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2019-08-15 12:00 EDT --> US/Eastern <-- 2019-08-15 16:00 UTC UTC 2019-08-15 17:00 BST Europe/London 2019-08-15 18:00 CEST Europe/Berlin 2019-08-15 18:00 CEST Europe/Paris 2019-08-15 21:30 IST Asia/Calcutta ---------------- New Day: Friday ----------------- 2019-08-16 00:00 HKT Asia/Hong_Kong 2019-08-16 00:00 +08 Asia/Singapore 2019-08-16 01:00 JST Asia/Tokyo 2019-08-16 02:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting = Followups = #topic #902 Cleanup & enhance spec files .fpc 902 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/902 #topic #904 Caret versioning .fpc 904 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/904 #topic #907 Which %__foo macros for executables are acceptable? .fpc 907 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/907 #topic #909 Suggest that linting/measuring-coverage is not for %check .fpc 909 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/909 #topic #914 Automatic R runtime dependencies .fpc 914 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/914 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can: * Reply to this e-mail * File a new ticket at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee * E-mail me directly * Bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

3 2

Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2020-05-28 16:00 - 16:55 UTC)
by James Antill 28 May '20

28 May '20

====================== #fedora-meeting-1: fpc ====================== Meeting started by geppetto at 16:00:33 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-05-28/fpc.2020-05-2… . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (geppetto, 16:00:33) * Schedule (geppetto, 16:05:22) * LINK: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject… (geppetto, 16:05:24) * 982 Fonts packaging stopped working etc. (geppetto, 16:06:15) * ACTION: tibbs will merge redhat-rpm-config PR and see if anyone complains (geppetto, 16:34:19) * ACTION: ignatenkobrain to blame geppetto if redhat-rpm-config maintainers will not be happy with tibbs merge (ignatenkobrain, 16:43:30) * #977 Get new members? (geppetto, 16:46:45) * Open Floor (geppetto, 16:52:46) Meeting ended at 16:55:57 UTC. Action Items ------------ * tibbs will merge redhat-rpm-config PR and see if anyone complains * ignatenkobrain to blame geppetto if redhat-rpm-config maintainers will not be happy with tibbs merge Action Items, by person ----------------------- * geppetto * ignatenkobrain to blame geppetto if redhat-rpm-config maintainers will not be happy with tibbs merge * ignatenkobrain * ignatenkobrain to blame geppetto if redhat-rpm-config maintainers will not be happy with tibbs merge * tibbs * tibbs will merge redhat-rpm-config PR and see if anyone complains * ignatenkobrain to blame geppetto if redhat-rpm-config maintainers will not be happy with tibbs merge * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * geppetto (82) * tibbs (41) * ignatenkobrain (30) * decathorpe (27) * zodbot (13) * limburgher (1) * mhroncok (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2020-05-28 16:00 UTC)
by James Antill 27 May '20

27 May '20

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2020-05-28 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): ================= Day: Thursday ================== 2020-05-28 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2020-05-28 12:00 EDT --> US/Eastern <-- 2020-05-28 16:00 UTC UTC 2020-05-28 17:00 BST Europe/London 2020-05-28 18:00 CEST Europe/Berlin 2020-05-28 18:00 CEST Europe/Paris 2020-05-28 21:30 IST Asia/Calcutta ---------------- New Day: Friday ----------------- 2020-05-29 00:00 HKT Asia/Hong_Kong 2020-05-29 00:00 +08 Asia/Singapore 2020-05-29 01:00 JST Asia/Tokyo 2020-05-29 02:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting = Followup Issues = #topic #907 Which %__foo macros for executables are acceptable? .fpc 907 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/907 #topic #909 Suggest that linting/measuring-coverage is not for %check .fpc 909 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/909 #topic #963 Blanket Bootstrap Exception for building Mono .fpc 963 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/963 #topic #977 Get new members? .fpc 977 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/977 = Followup Pull Requests = #topic #pr-814 Add SELinux Independent Policy Guidelines https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/814 #topic #pr-938 Add Package Review Process page https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/938 = New Pull Requests = #topic #pr-#942 Recommend storing changelog entries in separate file. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/942 #topic #pr-#947 Deprecate Old Style Dependency Generators https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/947 #topic #pr-#954 Prohibit use of `rpm` command from specfile. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/954 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can: * Reply to this e-mail * File a new ticket at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee * E-mail me directly * Bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

1 0

Redesigning the %python_provide macro from scratch
by Miro Hrončok 26 May '20

26 May '20

Hello Python packagers. After touching the %python_provide topic in: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproj… I have realized several things I don't like about %python_provide: 1) It must be used conditionally (it is not defined in python-srpm-macros). That means you always wrap it in %{?python_provide:...} in order to have a "valid" specfile even when the macro is not yet defined (e.g. during SRPM creation in Koji or on a packager's machine without python-rpm-macros installed). 2) You cannot use it with arbitrary versions. Suppose you package python3-foo 1.0 but you want to provide python3-bar 2.0 for some reason -- this is not very common, but it happens. %python_provide only takes the "name" as an argument, always using %{?epoch} %{version} and %{release}. 3) You need to both add a virtual provide + use the macro. Suppose you want to provide python3-pkg_resources from python3-setuptools. Currently, you need to add: Provides: python3-pkg_resources = %{version}-%{release} %{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-pkg_resources} 4) When used with (sub)package name, it generates a duplicate dependency on Fedora 33+ (and an rpmlint error). 5) It produces Obsoletes, but that might no longer be necessary nor desired. 6) Broken expectations about %_isa. It used to add %_isa provides based on wrong data, it no longer does that (except on old releases and EPELs), can be used manually with name%{?_isa}, but not on the old releases. 7) Undocuemnted error handling (e.g. the macro expands to nothing when used with pypy-foo, but errors when used with foo). Hence, I was thinking (for the sake of backwards compatibility) to provide a new mechanism to do this and preserve the old macro as is, deprecating it in Fedora 36-ish, actually maybe removing it once RHEL 9 goes EOL (or never, which is basically the same from today's perspective). The new macro should solve the problems from above, my current (quick, untested) ideas are: 1) Define the macro in python-srpm-macros. No need to use it conditionally. We can backport it to EPEL 8 and define a "stub" macro in EPEL 7 and 6. (An if we start using the macro only after Fedora 30 goes EOL, we can make the macro behave consistently across all Fedora versions.) 2) Accept version identifier as an optional argument, use %{?epoch} %{version} and %{release} as default. (See for example %{pypi_source} on how this can be done.) 3) Make the macro also produce the provide for the given name and document that. E.g. when you call it with python3-pkg_resources, it also provides python3-pkg_resources (not only python-pkg_resources etc.). 4) Make it so that for given arguments, the macro will only expand to something once per build. Hence when you use it with package name, the automatic provides won't re-add the same provide again. This also means you cannot have 2 different (sub)packages provide the same name-version-release, but that shall be very very very uncommon need and can always be workarounded somehow if needed. 5) No obsoletes with the new macro. Packagers use manual obsoletes when desired. 6) Document clearly that there is no %{?_isa} (and there is no "backwards compatibility" load to carry). When absolutely desired, packagers can call the macro with %{name}%{?_isa}. 7) Support arbitrary names. Only provide the given name and nothing else if not "recognized". As a bonus, I think the current if-elif-elif-elif-elif code can be replaced with lua patterns (imagine regex). As always, this leaves us with the name problem, but I'd very much like to use %python_provides (note the s). The only problem I see is that it is likely to be mistaken for the old one, but IMHO it shouldn't really hurt that much. Usage example: %package -n python3-setuptools %python_provides python3-pkg_resources Resulting provides: python3-setuptools = 46.6.6-6.fc33 python-setuptools = 46.6.6-6.fc33 python39-pkg_resources = 46.6.6-6.fc33 python3-pkg_resources = 46.6.6-6.fc33 python-pkg_resources = 46.6.6-6.fc33 python39-pkg_resources = 46.6.6-6.fc33 Another example: %package -n python3-pillow %python_provides python3-PIL 1.1.6-100 Resulting provides: python3-pillow = 7.1.1-1.fc33 python-pillow = 7.1.1-1.fc33 python39-pillow = 7.1.1-1.fc33 python3-PIL = 1.1.6-100 python-PIL = 1.1.6-100 python39-PIL = 1.1.6-100 Dummy when used with package name: %package -n python3-pip %python_provides python3-pip Provides: python3-pip = 20.0.2-1.fc33 python-pip = 20.0.2-1.fc33 python39-pip = 20.0.2-1.fc33 (all of them only once) Any name is OK: %python_provides wroom 666 Provides: wroom = 666 What do you think? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

4 10

IPython-like RPM Lua interactive console
by Miro Hrončok 23 May '20

23 May '20

Sharing this in case others find it useful. There is a way to have IPython-like RPM Lua interactive console for easier debugging of RPM Lua: https://eng.hroncok.cz/2020/05/14/ilua-rpm-console -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

3 4

One more vote for: Blanket Bootstrap Exception for building Mono
by James Antill 21 May '20

21 May '20

So this weeks meeting was full of other things, but we only need one more +1 on this: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/963 ...current +1 are: churchyard james limb decathorpe ...so if you aren't on the above list, please give it a quick look and help out the mono people.

2 1

Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2020-05-21 16:00 - 17:35 UTC)
by James Antill 21 May '20

21 May '20

====================== #fedora-meeting-1: fpc ====================== Meeting started by geppetto at 16:00:06 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-05-21/fpc.2020-05-2… . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (geppetto, 16:00:06) * Open Floor (geppetto, 16:08:14) * #982 Font packaging stopped working in rawhide/F33 (geppetto, 16:16:39) * ACTION: nim to provide SRPM that worked before and does not work with new RPM. (geppetto, 16:48:13) * ACTION: nim to revert usage of %new_package because that is breaking fonts packages for future patch breakage (geppetto, 16:48:48) * ACTION: FPC will review provided SRPM and figure out how to proceed from there, pushing back on rpm maintainers etc. if needed (geppetto, 16:49:18) * ACTION: ignatenkobrain to clean up the tickets around this and keep just one place for discussion (ignatenkobrain, 16:57:47) Meeting ended at 17:36:08 UTC. Action Items ------------ * nim to provide SRPM that worked before and does not work with new RPM. * nim to revert usage of %new_package because that is breaking fonts packages for future patch breakage * FPC will review provided SRPM and figure out how to proceed from there, pushing back on rpm maintainers etc. if needed * ignatenkobrain to clean up the tickets around this and keep just one place for discussion Action Items, by person ----------------------- * ignatenkobrain * ignatenkobrain to clean up the tickets around this and keep just one place for discussion * nim * nim to provide SRPM that worked before and does not work with new RPM. * nim to revert usage of %new_package because that is breaking fonts packages for future patch breakage * **UNASSIGNED** * FPC will review provided SRPM and figure out how to proceed from there, pushing back on rpm maintainers etc. if needed People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * nim_ (104) * geppetto (90) * ignatenkobrain (50) * mhroncok (42) * decathorpe (20) * zodbot (14) * tibbs (10) * limburgher (6) * nim (4) * petersen (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2020-05-21 16:00 UTC)
by James Antill 20 May '20

20 May '20

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2020-05-21 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): ================= Day: Thursday ================== 2020-05-21 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2020-05-21 12:00 EDT --> US/Eastern <-- 2020-05-21 16:00 UTC UTC 2020-05-21 17:00 BST Europe/London 2020-05-21 18:00 CEST Europe/Berlin 2020-05-21 18:00 CEST Europe/Paris 2020-05-21 21:30 IST Asia/Calcutta ---------------- New Day: Friday ----------------- 2020-05-22 00:00 HKT Asia/Hong_Kong 2020-05-22 00:00 +08 Asia/Singapore 2020-05-22 01:00 JST Asia/Tokyo 2020-05-22 02:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting = Followup Issues = #topic #907 Which %__foo macros for executables are acceptable? .fpc 907 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/907 #topic #909 Suggest that linting/measuring-coverage is not for %check .fpc 909 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/909 #topic #963 Blanket Bootstrap Exception for building Mono .fpc 963 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/963 = New Issues = #topic #982 Font packaging stopped working in rawhide/F33 .fpc 963 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/963 = Followup Pull Requests = #topic #pr-814 Add SELinux Independent Policy Guidelines https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/814 #topic #pr-938 Add Package Review Process page https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/938 = New Pull Requests = #topic #pr-#942 Recommend storing changelog entries in separate file. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/942 #topic #pr-#947 Deprecate Old Style Dependency Generators https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/947 #topic #pr-#954 Prohibit use of `rpm` command from specfile. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/954 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can: * Reply to this e-mail * File a new ticket at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee * E-mail me directly * Bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

1 0

Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2020-05-14 16:00 - 17:20 UTC)
by James Antill 14 May '20

14 May '20

====================== #fedora-meeting-1: fpc ====================== Meeting started by geppetto at 16:00:18 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-05-14/fpc.2020-05-1… . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (geppetto, 16:00:19) * Schedule (geppetto, 16:06:07) * #pr-#954 Prohibit use of `rpm` command from specfile. (geppetto, 16:07:43) * ACTION: ignatenkobrain to open RFE for mock to populate lua table with package versions in chroot (ignatenkobrain, 16:16:08) * LINK: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdb-heap/blob/master/f/gdb-heap.spec#_30 (mhroncok, 16:18:13) * LINK: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Math-Calc-Units/blob/master/f/perl-… I want a drink (mhroncok, 16:20:34) * ACTION: Propose a standard alternative and ban querying rpm from inside .spec (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) (geppetto, 16:32:55) * #pr-#942 Recommend storing changelog entries in separate file. (geppetto, 16:33:19) * LINK: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/942 (geppetto, 16:33:30) * #pr-#947 Deprecate Old Style Dependency Generators (geppetto, 16:39:51) * LINK: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/947 (geppetto, 16:39:55) * LINK: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org… (mhroncok, 16:48:11) * ACTION: mhroncok to look at how python can get fixed for automatic lib provides (geppetto, 17:05:46) * ACTION: decathorpe will help mhroncok (geppetto, 17:07:33) * ACTION: tibbs agrees to fix everything else :) (geppetto, 17:14:27) * ACTION: turn the %filter macros to error to avoid silent failures, we ban them (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) (geppetto, 17:17:20) Meeting ended at 17:21:28 UTC. Action Items ------------ * ignatenkobrain to open RFE for mock to populate lua table with package versions in chroot * Propose a standard alternative and ban querying rpm from inside .spec (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) * mhroncok to look at how python can get fixed for automatic lib provides * decathorpe will help mhroncok * tibbs agrees to fix everything else :) * turn the %filter macros to error to avoid silent failures, we ban them (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) Action Items, by person ----------------------- * decathorpe * decathorpe will help mhroncok * ignatenkobrain * ignatenkobrain to open RFE for mock to populate lua table with package versions in chroot * mhroncok * mhroncok to look at how python can get fixed for automatic lib provides * decathorpe will help mhroncok * tibbs * tibbs agrees to fix everything else :) * **UNASSIGNED** * Propose a standard alternative and ban querying rpm from inside .spec (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) * turn the %filter macros to error to avoid silent failures, we ban them (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * mhroncok (55) * geppetto (52) * tibbs (41) * ignatenkobrain (37) * decathorpe (33) * zodbot (15) * Defolos (10) * nils (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

Macronize %py3_shebang_fix
by Miro Hrončok 07 May '20

07 May '20

In this change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_shebangs_error We have advised the following: pathfix.py -pni "%{__python3} %{py3_shbang_opts}" <paths> To fix the shebangs. -p preserves timestamps -n prevents creating ~backup files -i specifies the interpreter for the shebang Now we have new features and we ultimately want this for the best experience: pathfix.py -pni %{python3} -ka %{py3_shbang_opts_nodash} -k keeps existing flags -a adds our flags (if not already there) %py3_shbang_opts_nodash is derived from %py3_shbang_opts This is very tedious copypasta. I propose we macronize this as follows: We create %py3_shebang_flags. By default, it is the same as %py3_shbang_opts without dash to avoid confusion, but it can be overridden. Note the proper "e" in the name. We create %py3_shebang_fix: pathfix.py -pni %{__python3} -k%{?py3_shebang_flags:a %py3_shebang_flags} Usage: %prep %autosetup %py3_shebang_fix . Or: %install ...install stuff... %py3_shebang_fix %{buildroot}%{python3_sitearch} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/* As a side not, is it possible to have conditonal expansion not expand on empty macro? E.g. this works: %undefine py3_shebang_flags %{?py3_shebang_flags:a %py3_shebang_flags} -> nothing But this does not: %global py3_shebang_flags %{nil} %{?py3_shebang_flags:a %py3_shebang_flags} -> a If not, we'll advise the users to undefine when they want "empty flags". -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

3 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

packaging May 2020