9:29 a.m.
Hi,
'nuff of all this. The subject says it all. I already asked for it *before*
*any* Extras builds would start taking place. It didn't happen. But now I
*want* it to happen before any FC4 Extras builds do.
And I'll go through every single spec file alone if I need to.
If anyone is _opposed_ to this change, please voice yourself now.
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.10-1.770_FC3
Load : 0.30 0.17 0.21
12:02 p.m.
New subject: Removing all zero epochs from spec files in devel branch
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 16:29 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
If anyone is _opposed_ to this change, please voice yourself now.
As long as it triggers known bugs in the distro version where this
action is targeted at, rpm in particular; I am.
12:11 p.m.
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Ville [ISO-8859-1] Skytt� wrote:
> If anyone is _opposed_ to this change, please voice yourself
now.
As long as it triggers known bugs in the distro version where this
action is targeted at, rpm in particular; I am.
I'd rather deal with the bugs than keep this thing around. It is
embarassing to grown people that have packaged lots of stuff in their
lifetimes.
Plus, all current versions of rpm should deal with this issue correctly.
The only stuff that breaks is the rpm --freshen on older releases of rpm.
Did I mention that rpm has been security errata'd several times since?
As I mentioned before, we're releasing these packages as part of a yum
repository. If you download them manually from the web and use rpm
--freshen instead of yum to update them, you get to keep all the broken
pieces.
I don't think we should care. A fringe usage gets a fringe result.
So what?
Cristian
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cristian Gafton -- gafton(a)redhat.com -- Red Hat, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Linux is a leprosy; and is having a deleterious effect on the U.S. IT
industry because it is steadily depreciating the value of the software
industry sector."
-- Kenneth Brown, President, Alexis de Tocqueville Institution
12:11 p.m.
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 13:11 -0500, Cristian Gafton wrote:
Plus, all current versions of rpm should deal with this issue
correctly.
The only stuff that breaks is the rpm --freshen on older releases of rpm.
Did I mention that rpm has been security errata'd several times since?
No, current rpm --freshen breaks too. My patch has not been taken into
rawhide rpm. I spoke to jbj about it this morning, and he responded by
curling into his little "political bullshit" ball and insisting that he
had to maintain existing freshen behavior for people that depend on it.
Does anyone even use --freshen these days? I don't think yum/apt uses
it...
~spot
---
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
12:40 p.m.
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 12:11 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 13:11 -0500, Cristian Gafton wrote:
>Plus, all current versions of rpm should deal with this issue correctly.
>The only stuff that breaks is the rpm --freshen on older releases of rpm.
>Did I mention that rpm has been security errata'd several times since?
No, current rpm --freshen breaks too. My patch has not been taken into
rawhide rpm. I spoke to jbj about it this morning, and he responded by
curling into his little "political bullshit" ball and insisting that he
had to maintain existing freshen behavior for people that depend on it.
Does anyone even use --freshen these days? I don't think yum/apt uses
it...
People using rpm --freshen to do these kind of upgrades are either nuts
enough to deal with the breakage using a bit of shell-scripting or
whatever or should be educated to use proper tools for the job, pick any
depsolver you prefer (rpm --freshen is part of rpm cli operations, not
rpmlib so none of the depsolvers are affected).
Kill the damn zero epochs finally, pretty please.
- Panu -
8:59 p.m.
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 14:00 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> Does anyone even use --freshen these days? I don't think yum/apt uses
> it...
yes - some of my scripting does, without significant incident
Then you should lean hard on jbj to take my patchfix for freshening in
an epoch corner case
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/show_bug.cgi?id=143301). Since we've
removed all the Epoch: 0 references in Extras, you will almost
definitely hit this bug.
I tried already. If it affects you, you should try. :)
~spot
---
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
12:14 p.m.
New subject: Removing all zero epochs from spec files in devel branch
Ville Skyttä wrote :
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 16:29 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> If anyone is _opposed_ to this change, please voice yourself now.
As long as it triggers known bugs in the distro version where this
action is targeted at, rpm in particular; I am.
I know jbj was still in Belgium until yesterday, but I don't know when
he'll be back to check out spot's fix for that particular freshen issue,
but I'll definitely be among the ones that will lobby him to push the fix
into FC4.
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.10-1.770_FC3
Load : 0.13 0.35 0.38
6:10 p.m.
Matthias Saou wrote :
And I'll go through every single spec file alone if I need to.
Checked manually _all_ spec files from "a" to "r" that contain the
word
"Epoch" somewhere. It's 1AM and I'm still in the office, so I'll
stop for
now before I start screwing too many spec files up... but I was dead
serious when I wrote the above, and I should be done by tomorrow.
Please don't hesitate to check some of the changes I've made, like Michael
seems to be doing, as I've probably broken things here and there...
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.10-1.770_FC3
Load : 0.64 0.52 0.50
7041
days inactive
7046
days old
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
8 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Cristian Gafton -
Matthias Saou -
Panu Matilainen -
R P Herrold -
Tom Callaway -
Ville Skyttä