On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 10:12 -0800, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 12:48 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 09:22 -0800, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
> >
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=403391
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718
> >
> > It looks like it is complaining about not being able to find the
> > gssapi_krb5 library (libgssapi_krb5.so), which is part of krb5-devel.
> > When I build it (manually) on my host after I remove krb5-devel (which
> > also removes neon-devel and openssl-devel) it complains about needing
> > neon-devel, which I then install neon-devel. neon-devel requires
> > krb5-devel and openssl-devel (which *is* needed by python-svn to build),
> > and it automatically installed when I `yum install neon-devel`. Does
> > this not occur with koji? Do I need to specify *all* deps even though
> > some of them are dep'd by other build deps?
>
> From the neon-devel-0.27.2-4 changelog:
>
> * Tue Dec 04 2007 Joe Orton <jorton(a)redhat.com> 0.27.2-3
> - rebuild against GnuTLS
> - drop static library
>
> Looks to me like it no longer requires openssl-devel.
Thanks! After seeing a comment by Mamoru Tasaka in BZ, I pretty much
inferred that neon in rawhide must not dep openssl anymore, but I hadn't
looked at the changelog. I'm updating the package now...
What is the policy for bumping release numbers when making pre-release
(I'm assuming it could be different) spec changes? I'm defaulting to
"yes, I need to bump the rel. ver. every time I make a spec change"; is
that correct? I couldn't find the answer in (perhaps, I just missed
it...):
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines
--Tim
____________________________________
/ But it does move! \
\ -- Galileo Galilei /
------------------------------------
\
\ \
\ /\
( )
.( o ).