It looks as though there's a consensus developed around how packages should be named. Being fairly new to rpm building, I have not understood all the details of the discussions around how best to implement those conventions. Might it be possible for one of you who does understand it to supplement the naming guidelines with a skeleton .spec file that illustrates how to do it, along with whatever is required of the surrounding build system?
On Monday 28 Feb 2005 21:51, Scott Lawrence wrote:
It looks as though there's a consensus developed around how packages should be named. Being fairly new to rpm building, I have not understood all the details of the discussions around how best to implement those conventions. Might it be possible for one of you who does understand it to supplement the naming guidelines with a skeleton .spec file that illustrates how to do it, along with whatever is required of the surrounding build system?
You need to install fedora-rpmdevtools for the rpmbuild directory see:
http://fedoranews.org/tchung/rpmbuild/
And for specfiles:
http://www.fedora.us/tempspecs/stable/
General ideas see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines
And:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines
Thanks,
G.
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 22:27 +0000, Gavin Henry wrote:
And for specfiles:
^^^ I haven't even looked at this. But if it conflicts with the below Guidelines, let me know.
General ideas see:
^^^ This is maybe 20% done. That doesn't mean its wrong, but I haven't finished it.
And:
^^^ This is 90% done. I'm going to make some changes to it this evening.
~spot --- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 18:00 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 22:27 +0000, Gavin Henry wrote:
And for specfiles:
^^^ I haven't even looked at this. But if it conflicts with the below Guidelines, let me know.
It's just a dump of all fedora.us specfiles, which is of doubtful usefulness nowadays.
Warren, could you take that offline and add a pointer or a redirect to http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/?root=extras there instead?
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org