Hi, I want to know whether multilib -devel packages are acceptable? This is related to bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965914#c5
Regards, Parag.
Am Donnerstag, den 20.06.2013, 11:41 +0530 schrieb Parag N(पराग़):
Hi,
I want to know whether multilib -devel packages are acceptable? This is related to bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965914#c5
Regards, Parag.
-- packaging mailing list packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Hi Parag!
Sure multilib -devel packages are allowed, e.g:
yum list glib-devel Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, priorities, refresh-packagekit Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile 16663 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Available Packages glib-devel.i686 1:1.2.10-39.fc19 fedora glib-devel.x86_64 1:1.2.10-39.fc19 fedora
invoking `yum list *-devel` shows perfectly every -devel-pkg is avail for multiarch.
Cheers, Björn
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Björn Esser bjoern.esser@gmail.comwrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 20.06.2013, 11:41 +0530 schrieb Parag N(पराग़):
Hi,
I want to know whether multilib -devel packages are acceptable? This is related to bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965914#c5
Regards, Parag.
-- packaging mailing list packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Hi Parag!
Sure multilib -devel packages are allowed, e.g:
yum list glib-devel Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, priorities, refresh-packagekit Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile 16663 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Available Packages glib-devel.i686 1:1.2.10-39.fc19 fedora glib-devel.x86_64 1:1.2.10-39.fc19 fedora
invoking `yum list *-devel` shows perfectly every -devel-pkg is avail for multiarch.
Sorry, I was not clear in my initial email. Yes, I know we can install multilib -devel but the bug given as a reference, fcitx-devel packages are giving "Transaction check error". I don't think maintainer should still think to push fcitx package to any fedora stable release with such a error.
Regards, Parag.
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:29:01 +0200, Björn Esser wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 20.06.2013, 11:41 +0530 schrieb Parag N(पराग़):
Hi,
I want to know whether multilib -devel packages are acceptable? This is related to bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965914#c5
Sure multilib -devel packages are allowed, e.g:
Not only are they "allowed", they belong to the primary set of packages that make a repo multiarch. The repo compose tool pulls in compatible -devel packages, their dependencies and run-time libs it detects:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/mash/plain/mash/multilib.py
The DevelMultilibMethod at the bottom is what's enabled in the config.
Conflicts between the two -devel packages for different archs ought to be fixed like other packaging bugs. That hasn't been found extremely important for early Fedora releases, but later we've worked with tracker bugs, such as 'multilibdevel':
packages with multilib -devel conflicts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/192658
There are tons of tickets about such conflicts.
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org