Hi! It would seem that the configs for the qt and kde updates were broken .. trying to update i have this :
Error: package kf5-frameworkintegration-5.27.0-1.fc23.x86_64 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.6.1, but none of the providers can be installed. ........... and so on
but if i try only qt5 update : dnf -v update qt5-* --best --allowerasing i get removing 7 packages : kde-print-manager kde-print-manager-libs plasma-desktop plasma-integration plasma-workspace plasma-workspace-drkonqi sddm-breeze
and downgrading: kdeplasma-addons kf5-frameworkintegration kf5-frameworkintegration-libs kf5-kdeclarative kf5-kwayland kf5-plasma
and the actual qt5 packages proposed for update are 5.6.2-1
so .. what is going on?
Thank you! Adrian
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 12:52:27 +0200, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Hi! It would seem that the configs for the qt and kde updates were broken .. trying to update i have this :
Error: package kf5-frameworkintegration-5.27.0-1.fc23.x86_64 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.6.1, but none of the providers can be installed. ........... and so on
but if i try only qt5 update : dnf -v update qt5-* --best --allowerasing i get removing 7 packages : kde-print-manager kde-print-manager-libs plasma-desktop plasma-integration plasma-workspace plasma-workspace-drkonqi sddm-breeze
and downgrading: kdeplasma-addons kf5-frameworkintegration kf5-frameworkintegration-libs kf5-kdeclarative kf5-kwayland kf5-plasma
and the actual qt5 packages proposed for update are 5.6.2-1
so .. what is going on?
You need to show the fully versioned list of which packages are installed at the time _before_ you try to update and the fully versioned list of which packages are available in all enabled repos.
Only then you can draw conclusions, usually after examining the package dependencies.
Just based on what you've quoted, I would guess the explicit dependency found in kf5-frameworkintegration on an older Qt 5 version blocks the update. There should be are rebuild in the updates repo, however: kf5-frameworkintegration-5.27.0-1.fc23.2.x86_64.rpm It depends on the Qt 5.6.2 package. Do you see it in the repo? Maybe you are affected by more so-called "broken dependencies"?
Fedora still doesn't do anything to prevent such broken deps in stable releases, unfortunately. Some stay around for a long time, because nobody stumbles into them or nobody reports them.
On 12/10/2016 04:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 12:52:27 +0200, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Hi! It would seem that the configs for the qt and kde updates were broken .. trying to update i have this :
Error: package kf5-frameworkintegration-5.27.0-1.fc23.x86_64 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.6.1, but none of the providers can be installed. ........... and so on
but if i try only qt5 update : dnf -v update qt5-* --best --allowerasing i get removing 7 packages : kde-print-manager kde-print-manager-libs plasma-desktop plasma-integration plasma-workspace plasma-workspace-drkonqi sddm-breeze
and downgrading: kdeplasma-addons kf5-frameworkintegration kf5-frameworkintegration-libs kf5-kdeclarative kf5-kwayland kf5-plasma
and the actual qt5 packages proposed for update are 5.6.2-1
so .. what is going on?
You need to show the fully versioned list of which packages are installed at the time _before_ you try to update and the fully versioned list of which packages are available in all enabled repos.
Only then you can draw conclusions, usually after examining the package dependencies.
Ok, so everything depends on qt5-qbase : rpm -qa qt5-qtbase qt5-qtbase-5.6.1-3.fc23.x86_64
proposed update : 5.6.2-1.fc23
Just based on what you've quoted, I would guess the explicit dependency found in kf5-frameworkintegration on an older Qt 5 version blocks the update. There should be are rebuild in the updates repo, however: kf5-frameworkintegration-5.27.0-1.fc23.2.x86_64.rpm It depends on the Qt 5.6.2 package. Do you see it in the repo? Maybe you are affected by more so-called "broken dependencies"?
the thing is that i have it installed : rpm -qa kf5-frameworkintegration kf5-frameworkintegration-5.27.0-1.fc23.x86_64
as i said, the main problem is with update only qt5-* i get proposal to erase : kde-print-manager kde-print-manager-libs plasma-desktop plasma-integration plasma-workspace plasma-workspace-drkonqi sddm-breeze
and downgrade : kdeplasma-addons kf5-frameworkintegration kf5-frameworkintegration-libs kf5-kdeclarative kf5-kwayland kf5-plasma
that would mean that these packages have hard dependency on the old 5.6.1
Should i open 1 signle ticket in bugzila for all these packages or just a ticket per package?
Thank you! Adrian
Fedora still doesn't do anything to prevent such broken deps in stable releases, unfortunately. Some stay around for a long time, because nobody stumbles into them or nobody reports them. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 17:34:26 +0200, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Just based on what you've quoted, I would guess the explicit dependency found in kf5-frameworkintegration on an older Qt 5 version blocks the update. There should be are rebuild in the updates repo, however: kf5-frameworkintegration-5.27.0-1.fc23.2.x86_64.rpm It depends on the Qt 5.6.2 package. Do you see it in the repo? Maybe you are affected by more so-called "broken dependencies"?
the thing is that i have it installed : rpm -qa kf5-frameworkintegration kf5-frameworkintegration-5.27.0-1.fc23.x86_64
No. That's not the same package I mentioned. Notice the extra ".2" behind ".fc23". That's a minor release update in the least-significant right-most part of the package "Release" tag.
Details like that can be _very_ important when examining dependency problems and checking which packages are available in the repo.
On 12/11/2016 02:42 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 17:34:26 +0200, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Just based on what you've quoted, I would guess the explicit dependency found in kf5-frameworkintegration on an older Qt 5 version blocks the update. There should be are rebuild in the updates repo, however: kf5-frameworkintegration-5.27.0-1.fc23.2.x86_64.rpm It depends on the Qt 5.6.2 package. Do you see it in the repo? Maybe you are affected by more so-called "broken dependencies"?
the thing is that i have it installed : rpm -qa kf5-frameworkintegration kf5-frameworkintegration-5.27.0-1.fc23.x86_64
No. That's not the same package I mentioned. Notice the extra ".2" behind ".fc23". That's a minor release update in the least-significant right-most part of the package "Release" tag.
yes, you're right, i did not see it .. but is this ok to have a versioning number after the os id??
anyway, the problem was solved (fixed packages in updates) ..
Thank you! Adrian
Details like that can be _very_ important when examining dependency problems and checking which packages are available in the repo.
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:11:51 +0200, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
No. That's not the same package I mentioned. Notice the extra ".2" behind ".fc23". That's a minor release update in the least-significant right-most part of the package "Release" tag.
yes, you're right, i did not see it .. but is this ok to have a versioning number after the os id??
Yes.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning#Minor_release_bumps_for_...
What you call "os id" is known as "dist tag" and is part of the package Release, so for example
1.fc23.1 would be higher (= "newer") than 1.fc23
but
1.fc24 would still be higher than 1.fc23.1
because fc24 is higher than fc23.
On 12/11/2016 08:55 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:11:51 +0200, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
No. That's not the same package I mentioned. Notice the extra ".2" behind ".fc23". That's a minor release update in the least-significant right-most part of the package "Release" tag.
yes, you're right, i did not see it .. but is this ok to have a versioning number after the os id??
Yes.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning#Minor_release_bumps_for_...
What you call "os id" is known as "dist tag" and is part of the package Release, so for example
1.fc23.1 would be higher (= "newer") than 1.fc23
but
1.fc24 would still be higher than 1.fc23.1
because fc24 is higher than fc23.
i see, thank you for information!
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Hi! It would seem that the configs for the qt and kde updates were broken .. trying to update i have this :
Should be fixed by: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-22b09070a2
-- Rex
On 12/10/2016 07:18 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Hi! It would seem that the configs for the qt and kde updates were broken .. trying to update i have this :
Should be fixed by: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-22b09070a2
Thanks a lot! it worked :)
Adrian
-
Adrian Sevcenco -
Michael Schwendt -
Rex Dieter