Installing virt-manager in Fedora 19 did not create a network bridge
by Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
Hi,
When I installed virt-manager in Ubuntu, it created a network bridge
called virbr0.
Now that I have installed virt-manager in Fedora 19, it did not create a
network bridge.
So how do I create a network bridge? Is virt-manager supposed to create
a network bridge?
I installed virt-manager using the following command.
sudo yum install virt-manager
Are there any more rpm packages which I am supposed to install?
Thank you very much.
--
Yours sincerely,
Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
10 years, 9 months
sms reader / email client?
by Ian Malone
Hi,
Having just changed my phone I've got a lot of backed up messages in
csv format (without the sender name, so I'm going to have to reconcile
it with the separate contacts backup). While there are ways to get tem
onto my new phone I'm not really sure I want them there, but some are
useful and need to be kept. What I'm wondering is if there's some kind
of desktop reader that can handle this. I'd have thought an email
client, or groupware like evolution would have a way to handle SMS,
but haven't found anything so far (there are addons for *sending*, but
not sure they do what I want, which is ability to sort, search and
browse received messages).
--
imalone
http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk
10 years, 9 months
LibreOffice find/replace tries to replace everything where it matches or not
by Temlakos
Everyone:
It's taken me this long to realize what the problem is. But I cannot use
Find-and-replace with LibreOffice anymore. It either tries to replace
everything under the sun with my Replace text, or else it can't find the
search key (typically a multi-word phrase) even though I am staring
right at it.
Where do I file the bug, and against what?
I am using the now-current version of LibreOffice for Fedora 19. When I
upgraded to F19, that's when the trouble started.
Temlakos
10 years, 9 months
Can I run two "instances" of apache httpd?
by Georgios Petasis
Hi all,
In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl through
apache rivet) which implements a "heavy" application, something that
takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new process.
Is there a way to "separate" these "heavy" apache processes from the
rest of the apache?
I.e. when the url is "/my_heavy_service" redirect the request to the
apache which has the "heavy" application loaded, and the rest of the
requests be handled by an apache with does not even has mod_rivet loaded?
Like starting an apache on a different port (i.e. 8123), which loads my
application, and starting a "normal" apache on port 80, which serves all
requests except some, which are directed to the server in port 8123.
In general I think it can be done (i.e.:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/RunningMultipleApacheInstances),
but is a way to do this in fedora 19, and keep all this "systemctl *
httpd" stuff?
Has anyone attempted this?
George
10 years, 9 months
Re: nvidia on inspiron
by Patrick Dupre
Hello Joe,
Thank.
Do not worry, I already removed the nvidia driver because it was not
working;
Concerning the F14 installation, after double checking, it had been updated
to fedora 16 and only
nvidia-xconfig-1.0-20.fc16.i686
nvidia-settings-1.0-22.fc16.i686
are installed. Thus I guess that it OK.
I have been oriented toward nvidia because a member of list suggested
to install these drivers because I was complaining about a frozen
laptop after a screen lock!
Anyway, thank you. but a wrong way of doing without bad consequences
Regards.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Joe Zeff
> Sent: 08/09/13 08:34 PM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: nvidia on inspiron
>
> On 08/09/2013 11:14 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > yum remove *-nvidia*
>
> Correction: yum remove \*nvidia\*
>
> Your way won't work because bash will expand the wildcards if you don't
> escape them.
> --
> users mailing list
> users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years, 9 months
Re: nvidia on inspiron
by Patrick Dupre
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Marko Vojinovic
> Sent: 08/09/13 01:10 PM
> To: users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: nvidia on inspiron
>
> On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:43:05 +0200
> "Patrick Dupre" <pdupre(a)gmx.com> wrote:
> > Now
> > yum install kmod-nvidia
> > gives:
> > Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
> > 1:kmod-nvidia-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
> > 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from
> > rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-7.fc19.i686
> > from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
> > 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-319.32-7.fc19.i686 from
> > rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
> >
> > It seems that there are some confusion with kmod-nvidia
> > Which one?
>
> Please provide the full yum output. I cannot see what is wrong from the
> snippet that you gave.
yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia works fine and install:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia i686 1:319.32-7.fc19
kmod-nvidia-3.9.9-302.fc19.i686.PAE i686 1:319.32-1.fc19
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs i686 1:319.32-7.fc19
while yum install kmod-nvidia
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package kmod-nvidia.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 >= 1:319.32-2.fc19 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-319.32-2.fc19.i686
--> Running transaction check
---> Package kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nvidia-kmod-common >= 1:319.32 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686
--> Running transaction check
---> Package kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686
---> Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia.i686 1:319.32-7.fc19 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs(x86-32) = 1:319.32-7.fc19 for package: 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-7.fc19.i686
--> Running transaction check
---> Package kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686
---> Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs.i686 1:319.32-7.fc19 will be installed
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 (rpmfusion-nonfree-updates)
Requires: kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686
Installed: kernel-PAE-3.9.9-302.fc19.i686 (@updates)
kernel-uname-r = 3.9.9-302.fc19.i686.PAE
Installed: kernel-PAE-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 (@updates)
kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686.PAE
Installed: kernel-PAE-3.10.4-300.fc19.i686 (@updates)
kernel-uname-r = 3.10.4-300.fc19.i686.PAE
Available: kernel-PAE-3.9.5-301.fc19.i686 (fedora)
kernel-uname-r = 3.9.5-301.fc19.i686.PAE
Available: kernel-PAEdebug-3.9.5-301.fc19.i686 (fedora)
kernel-uname-r = 3.9.5-301.fc19.i686.PAEdebug
Available: kernel-PAEdebug-3.10.4-300.fc19.i686 (updates)
kernel-uname-r = 3.10.4-300.fc19.i686.PAEdebug
Available: kernel-debug-3.9.5-301.fc19.i686 (fedora)
kernel-uname-r = 3.9.5-301.fc19.i686.debug
Available: kernel-debug-3.10.4-300.fc19.i686 (updates)
kernel-uname-r = 3.10.4-300.fc19.i686.debug
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
and
yum install kmod-nvidia --skip-broken
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package kmod-nvidia.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 >= 1:319.32-2.fc19 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-319.32-2.fc19.i686
--> Running transaction check
---> Package kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686
--> Processing Dependency: nvidia-kmod-common >= 1:319.32 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686
--> Running transaction check
---> Package kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686
---> Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia.i686 1:319.32-7.fc19 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs(x86-32) = 1:319.32-7.fc19 for package: 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-7.fc19.i686
--> Running transaction check
---> Package kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686
---> Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs.i686 1:319.32-7.fc19 will be installed
Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
1:kmod-nvidia-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-7.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-319.32-7.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
> Also, keep in mind that there is a "kmod-nvidia" driver for the "recent"
> nvidia graphics cards, then there is another "kmod-nvidia-304xx" driver
> for the "older" cards, and finally there is a "kmod-nvidia-173xx" driver
> for "ancient" cards.
>
> It would be a good idea to figure out which hardware you actually have,
>
> lspci | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] RV515/M54 [Mobility Radeon X1400]
> and then install the appropriate driver. You have the details spelled
> out here:
>
> http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia
>
> (although I'd say that this howto is a tad bit outdated, but it's
> still mostly correct).
>
> HTH, :-)
> Marko
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years, 9 months
How do I start libvirt in Fedora 19?
by Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
Hi,
I have just installed virt-manager in Fedora 19. I have looked into the
/etc/init.d directory but I can't find any init scripts for libvirt.
Is libvirt using systemd, and if so, how do I start it?
Thank you very much.
--
Yours sincerely,
Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
10 years, 9 months
libreswan on Feodra
by Kevin Wilson
Hi,
I have installed libreswan 3.3-1 on fc18 from RPM.
How do I start the libreswan service on Fedora ?
I tried:
systemctl status libreswan.service
libreswan.service
Loaded: error (Reason: No such file or directory)
Active: inactive (dead)
regards,
Kevin
10 years, 9 months
Change device/partition label
by Mark Haney
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I know this is an easy one, but I can't seem to find the current
correct way to do it. I've got a TB HDD that I need to change the
LABEL on. Currently it's 'LIVE' (it's an old production drive) and I
really want to just remove the label altogether and mount it with the
UUID of the drive.
What's the best and most current way to do it? I was thinking e2label
will do it, but it's been so long since I've done it, I'm playing it
safe.
Ideas?
- --
Mark Haney, Software Developer
Mobile: 828-337-6540 Email: mark.haney(a)gmail.com
Linux augustus.homelinux.org 3.10.4-300.fc19.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSA/b3AAoJEOrjdPlXBuPglEYH/i3xEhFJLrDgq5BvARG7R2BN
6dGsyluyv89Na5A/Z2nDe8BKfl7uVi5sGEzs5wwGbHjJnMeuH8nVZ2EZauYFrTUJ
Zl2fFWoopJ9p8d78tXLhwFCDQ6OQ8Vp8LA8kcT+EIYaH31KA863+y5AKS6NdBRAf
tGMstx4KzVnAgio0UZX+m+127AMByfMrF5s837FxaF458zzZ9myhXob46o3jWde+
Za2WBxy6eiI/W7ynICHz3mWXgp/Wevm1bVko7gaE8VGKXAIgoVqnsHFFCBvdFBP+
BTel8T+/23XTfkXVHU1swhUl+C3QeJmhYdmfRiY1a5ONAw4eaeLCOdI3ndaS2do=
=wbOA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
10 years, 9 months
