users November 2022

users@lists.fedoraproject.org

87 participants
80 discussions

semanage in f36
by François Patte 04 Nov '22

04 Nov '22

Bonjour, Wanting to change the ssh default port, I read in /etc/ssh/sshd_config : "If you want to change the port on a SELinux system, you have to tell SELinux about this change. semanage port -a -t ssh_port_t -p tcp #PORTNUMBER" So, I tried this command, but: semanage: command not found What can I do? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from…

2 1

Finding the stats on my video card
by Joe Zeff 03 Nov '22

03 Nov '22

There's a fairly old game that I've been playing on my laptop that I've just installed on my desktop. It runs, but slowly. Checking, I need a CPU that runs at at least 2 GH (Mine runs at 2.83) and has at least 2 GB of RAM. (I have 8) The only other possibility is that my video card might not be up to it, but I don't remember how to check that. Any pointers in the right direction will be appreciated.

2 1

Who should be owner of /run/systemd/users/1000?? root or 1000?
by Michael D. Setzer II 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

On one of my machines I noticed a bunch of little pop up messages that don't say much but say opps and that it is probable automatically being reported. In looking at messages it shows a lot of things about seline and seems linked to /run/systemd/users/1000 Looking at directory, see it showing the owner as root and not 1000? cd /run/systemd/users/ [root@setzconote users]# ls -l -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 257 Oct 31 08:42 1000 looking at message log it says to run this command. sealert -l c9b47966-9b7c-4eeb-a209-b8b4034caba9 SELinux is preventing dbus-daemon from read access on the file 1000. ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests ************************** If you believe that dbus-daemon should be allowed read access on the 1000 file by default. Then you should report this as a bug. You can generate a local policy module to allow this access. Do allow this access for now by executing: # ausearch -c 'dbus-daemon' --raw | audit2allow -M my-dbusdaemon # semodule -X 300 -i my-dbusdaemon.pp Additional Information: Source Context system_u:system_r:gnome_atspi_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 Target Context system_u:object_r:systemd_logind_var_run_t:s0 Target Objects 1000 [ file ] Source dbus-daemon Source Path dbus-daemon Port <Unknown> Host setzco.dyndns.org Source RPM Packages Target RPM Packages SELinux Policy RPM selinux-policy-targeted-35.19-1.fc35.noarch Local Policy RPM selinux-policy-targeted-35.19-1.fc35.noarch Selinux Enabled True Policy Type targeted Enforcing Mode Permissive Host Name setzco.dyndns.org Platform Linux setzco.dyndns.org 6.0.5-100.fc35.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Oct 26 16:27:59 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 Alert Count 43 First Seen 2022-10-29 17:13:40 ChST Last Seen 2022-11-02 22:59:29 ChST Local ID c9b47966-9b7c-4eeb-a209-b8b4034caba9 Raw Audit Messages type=AVC msg=audit(1667393969.159:396): avc: denied { read } for pid=1494 comm="dbus-daemon" name="1000" dev="tmpfs" ino=1692 scontext=system_u:system_r:gnome_atspi_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:object_r:systemd_logind_var_run_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=1 Hash: dbus-daemon,gnome_atspi_t,systemd_logind_var_run_t,file,read Other machines don't seem to show these messages, but haven't looked in logs. Seems it is only right after boot and login, and the fill about 3 screens full of messages, but then the just all close and normal desktop is left?? +------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) mailto:mikes@guam.net mailto:msetzerii@gmail.com Guam - Where America's Day Begins G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/ +------------------------------------------------------------+

4 3

Can I see an iMac drive with a Live USB?
by ToddAndMargo 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

Hi All, I have an upcoming appointment with a customer who wants a number of his old computers (mostly iMacs) removed from service. With other computers, if I can remove the drives, I just remove them and give them to the customer to hit with a hammer. But iMacs I will need a glass puller, etc.. So what I usually do when I can not get the drive out is to boot into a Linux (Fedora) Live USB and run # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sd[x] Where sd[x] is the drive to be blanked. This will write 0x00H across every section of the drive. Then give it to the computer local charity used computer store (or the dumpster) "dev" only has to see the drive. I do not need or want to be able to mount or read the drive, just see it. dd is a block device and does not care what format is. Do any of you guys know if I will be able to see the drive on a iMac? Many thanks, -T -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Computers are like air conditioners. They malfunction when you open windows ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

9 18

Can't unsubscribe from a list
by fs 3000 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

I keep getting mails from arm@ no matter what i do. I have tried sending mail to arm-leave@, it says i'm not a member. I went to the page and unsubscribed from there, nothing works. Any idea?

4 4

Fwd: [Undeliverable: Re: Mailing lists and Discourse]
by Wolfgang Pfeiffer 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

TL;DR: Emails I'm sending to this list take many hours until they reach this list. Main problem 'tho is that shortly after sending them I'm getting an error message from postmaster(a)outlook.com telling me about unspecified errors regarding the mail transport. The message for this is attached with this email. Details: I actually wanted to send this email to an admin responsible for this list, but there's no one to find. And I encourage everyone not familiar with a mess like below to simply ignore this message: I hope 'tho that someone from the Fedora list admins has a look at it. The problem seems to be on the side of the Fedora mail distribution servers, that seem to be connected in one way or another with outlook.com. The error message below, that was sent to me after sending an email to this list (via relay=mail.gmx.net. [212.227.17.190] - the message itself can be seen at the very end of the forwarded message below) is a mess, so it's not clear at all who is resposible for the fact that my emails to this list are 1: first delivered with no problems that I'd know of to the Fedora list's servers (see the default Fedora list footers attached to my email that I sent, at the very end of this message, which seem to indicate just that) and after that successfull delivery to the fedora servers are 2: managed by some outlook.com servers (please see messages below), that complain that "(protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning lists.fedoraproject.org discourages use of 205.220.165.146 as permitted sender)" 3: Additionally some y.antoniowatson(a)gmail.com is involved (see below). Plus I checked my MTA (sendmail) logs: I have not sent this mail at the very end to some y.antoniowatson(a)gmail.com, whoever this is ... The email below, at the very end of this forwarded mail, obviously, after successfully being sent to the fedora list servers, was handled by outlook.com and lists.fedoraproject.org - and in the end delivered to this list. After many hours. So two questions to Fedora list admins (or anyone else who understands the message attached) 1: Is my email address roto(a)gmx.net seen as a spammer address by the Fedora list software? 2: Does anyone understand what happened according to the message attached below from postmaster(a)outlook.com Thanks in anticipation Wolfgang ----- Forwarded message from postmaster(a)outlook.com ----- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 17:46:59 +0000 From: postmaster(a)outlook.com Subject: Undeliverable: Re: Mailing lists and Discourse To: roto(a)gmx.net Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: y.antoniowatson(a)gmail.com<mailto:y.antoniowatson@gmail.com> Your message wasn't delivered because the recipient's email provider rejected it. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: PR3P189MB1017.EURP189.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM y.antoniowatson(a)gmail.com Remote Server returned '550-5.7.26 The MAIL FROM domain [gmx.net] has an SPF record with a hard fail 550-5.7.26 policy (-all) but it fails to pass SPF checks with the ip: 550-5.7.26 [104.47.13.56]. To best protect our users from spam and phishing, 550-5.7.26 the message has been blocked. Please visit 550-5.7.26 https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126#authentication for more 550 5.7.26 information. r20-20020a05640251d400b0045d4b7ad162si6801981edd.546 - gsmtp' Original message headers: Received: from AM7P189MB0759.EURP189.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:20b:112::22) by PR3P189MB1017.EURP189.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:102:49::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5746.28; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 17:46:59 +0000 Resent-From: <yurelw(a)outlook.com> Received: from AM7P189MB0759.EURP189.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([::1]) by AM7P189MB0759.EURP189.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::55cb:31af:f4b8:4802%7]) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.20.5746.026; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 17:46:59 +0000 Authentication-Results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 205.220.165.146) smtp.mailfrom=lists.fedoraproject.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=fail action=none header.from=gmx.net; Received-SPF: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning lists.fedoraproject.org discourages use of 205.220.165.146 as permitted sender) X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:5F996FCD486CB9A5DDC47F972D9B274246B5922993F5A04FD24DDE6016C7FBA6;UpperCasedChecksum:98B9C064274D738DF1836C2DE295FF7A3BECD580157A142003FD238176733849;SizeAsReceived:8269;Count:50 Authentication-Results-Original: ppops.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=users-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bastion01.iad2.fedoraproject.org 34842309A1BC X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mailman01.iad2.fedoraproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 19:46:03 +0200 From: Wolfgang Pfeiffer <roto(a)gmx.net> To: Community support for Fedora users <users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: Mailing lists and Discourse Message-ID: <Y1lyW5vQH38/PuKq@localhost> References: <cf58117ae2537939313425e20d1e782174551b8f.camel(a)gmail.com> <cone.1666658660.788601.74631.1004(a)monster.email-scan.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <cone.1666658660.788601.74631.1004(a)monster.email-scan.com> User-Agent: Mutt/2.1.5 (2021-12-30) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:9i1HzSehIxgsFHqIVzO2mpUH4B9K7b0QnEYEiU7URgdhSDf2X9h g1fqP+oGWslID5hT+fny4KXifcqELWaTUlk0I3jS51vW08esUCcrgopgXXOkKutRlsYcjuI FOMPb86JNAKy+XVatM0CeA5oEfhcRlgDZMeTu4yLutB64szWFTxq5YuiEvOzvLrcUF8/1g8 5p1ChPJCbltDiOeKiUgfg== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:KdSpR1RrdTo=;xRC5Z9PZSnzq7+mEMXcKufwJnlx a1v1z20iBrAwuXW5ibmsyJmX5sgwEVSIh01uffICDM4nLnHxk1ne41+0A/LTTkehFzuXMlZlk 6BC8r3S1Q4mnq0qGhis7zieLyTbtYLXVDA0crajBEP8Q8PO81/A8mp9Uk0lOdATYcoqvKWIbb iX0spn53kY9bGrsqGZOEQ4Wq6S6S2gS5Amx426nCBY7BiGrgxQnkhPHN4RQJJgnAFBVKGVBxH u78V2sqkrMxiTDr+wkXw6x9fbgtUjPD4aW8lq6BZYQyIYIt0gSRsQ6/calTyJc3s76jEXKVSd Yq3y0cAabmNxVwi8pbq181yLQ3RiOST1f8Ve8/YEf6SQ1XzrHZTvVUq5XjX5nDG0dBQw09pGU xnf7Opy3mNcP9pkpvAhpNgyQKVkQTQUOoP3b/b7bw62dpn5DiE01C0CcKVWAD2CdZNUV8wug3 dNmNyVu906Nslp/NfqoxMLoeZRpPajY4iNjTswZKux85/liL35qGujpY1rELHNCgpTEzTpH+o r9XbeXWkIX5tV+hF3USQtIV5y8dmvYnHd0yuL8grwd4ldd5tHKDXzcq98eMAelKklLvxPMkc4 K7MYu3fAzh4DignsfKaOs3ugS0KF+JGF20XLMHtf55UNWwB3Ci+qHO9+lfTMNlISKA9caN+5j p1wsdbpeGN4zycI6SfMqZPgI5PvPmO/GimxJ01eea6wzDraVX4Ge0P7HrrSr4ahXqwzBTsPEj baWBn1+hcc2OA3hZsrG6Z4s1FL7YrWRM5Rs4/OolW8micEA1dJhombZKymB15JF9GroQwLrbc lXjTw7Pgmp6xw4bBdHZ9FAUnPbgmhpf4Xo2iamKK+SSv/WRCPuUv5kMKJHsAKvdFn8Ek5HK1Q TyoI5Ix9OCdbTChXuvZ/WA23wHS8WNdMQIdcQA9V6HRclSTQcT+qPWeSS6ERKXSrAJmRoqqof 22oRFi31AuboEmXhtHepDlCzyIs= Message-ID-Hash: GKCG5AXR4DQWAVNOHFBJLNIHEV6GSTTC X-Message-ID-Hash: GKCG5AXR4DQWAVNOHFBJLNIHEV6GSTTC X-MailFrom: roto(a)gmx.net X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-config-1; header-match-config-2; header-match-config-3; header-match-users.lists.fedoraproject.org-0; header-match-users.lists.fedoraproject.org-1; header-match-users.lists.fedoraproject.org-2; header-match-users.lists.fedoraproject.org-3; header-match-users.lists.fedoraproject.org-4; header-match-users.lists.fedoraproject.org-5; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users <users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> List-Id: Community support for Fedora users <users.lists.fedoraproject.org> Archived-At: <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org…> List-Archive: <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/> List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=help> List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:users-join@lists.fedoraproject.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Proofpoint-GUID: NeBoWrY21wJ00SsHX8ZudHSgL2fSLCu1 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: NeBoWrY21wJ00SsHX8ZudHSgL2fSLCu1 X-CLX-Response: 1TFkXGx4ZEQpMehccGhEKWUQXa1N9f1N6bVJhf3sRClhYF2UBaHhyHGN5WEt bEQp4ThdiYUtZZBNCUB5/HREKeEsXZQFoeHIcY3lYS1sRCnhMF2F6YxMaYxkaaWxMEQp5TBdkZV lHb3NyHkgccBEKQ0gXBxgTExEKQ1kXBx4cHREKQ0kXGgQaGhoRCllNF2dmchEKWUkXGnEaEBp3B hlxGBodEBsTHncGGBoGGxgaEQpZXhdobmYRCklGF19FTF1HS1leT1h1QkVZXk9OEQpJRxdrRl4R CkNOF2RPaEV9WHMYG11gGhp5WWJyEnBfTmJ5TWYYTHlmaV8bEQpYXBcfBBoEGB0ZBRsaBBsaGgQ bGR4EGR4QGx4aHxoRCl5ZF0tAUklYEQpNXBccGxgRCkxaF2xtUk1dEQpNThdoEQpMRhdva2tvXm tuEQpCTxdnTRN9YE1aQUVtXBEKQ1oXGBsYBBgYHQQbHQQYGxEKQl4XGxEKWUUXExEKRUkXGxEKR WYXHhEKQkYXa1N9f1N6bVJhf3sRCkJHF2dOSRxHTltHekZjEQpCRRdlZW5DGB9pflocWxEKQk4X YV19XGhOTXBLTnoRCkJMF2tiflNtAVN5WX1vEQpCbBdobxNbG3BdG1IbXBEKQkAXY1N6ZBkaRXN gbl4RCkJYF2NwY0RhaE5lZWRvEQpaWBceEQp5QxdmGhJ9HFgTbG9ccxEKWUsXEh0YGBEKcGcXa1 xSe2xwHl1DWGsQGBgRCnBoF2NFQElzZlpnQUVhEBoRCnBoF2hrZx9Jf2lNa0NaEBoRCnBoF2lEa WhJZ3JfQENiEBoRCnBoF2dBTx5Fa0BjUkVrEBoRCnBoF2hHUkRcSEN7Ek5PEBoRCnBoF2QSQgFz bkJTRVlrEBoRCnBoF2FQfxpASVoZQGQTEB4aEQpwaBdvGWN+eEQeQ3JOYRAeGhEKcH0XYnISZBl +fl5hYFIQGhEKcGcXem5pckZib1AeQHMQGBgRCnB9F28cBU9HQm1bcG5BEBsaGxEKcH0XYFxMRl sYHFlLZXgQGxobEQpwZxdrck9heXxBYhxdEhAYGBEKcH0XbE1BGBhQfh0abkwQHRoRCnB/F2dOB Whcb0hua3N7EBMYEQpwXxdiQV1dbHtTH3xDZRAaEQpwfxdkHkdoZ0VQXltTQBASHREKcF8XYkkT fkxEWVBoXgEQGxobEQpwXxdpYkYZQGJhTh1IchAbGhsRCnBfF2lHWB5/b3ABRnNTEBgYEQpwbBd hbmBTEnxPZkJgWxAaEQpwQxdoTx5HbEN9SX8aSBAaEQptfhcaEQpYTRdLESA= X-CLX-Shades: MLX X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.545,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-10-26_07,2022-10-26_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=in_ext_notspam policy=in_ext score=0 bulkscore=0 unknownsenderscore=20 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=60 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=143 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2209130000 definitions=main-2210260100 domainage_hfrom=8722 X-IncomingHeaderCount: 50 Return-Path: roto(a)gmx.net X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-EOPTenantAttributedMessage: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa:0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BN8NAM04FT038:EE_|GV1P189MB2148:EE_|AM7P189MB0759:EE_|PR3P189MB1017:EE_ X-MS-UserLastLogonTime: 10/26/2022 5:31:45 PM X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 36ef44af-0bcf-47d6-2f48-08dab77a13c2 X-MS-Exchange-EOPDirect: true X-Sender-IP: 205.220.165.146 X-SID-PRA: ROTO(a)GMX.NET X-SID-Result: NONE X-MS-Exchange-AtpMessageProperties: SA|SL X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Oct 2022 17:46:56.9389 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 36ef44af-0bcf-47d6-2f48-08dab77a13c2 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN8NAM04FT038.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: GV1P189MB2148 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-EndToEndLatency: 00:00:01.8242613 X-MS-Exchange-Processed-By-BccFoldering: 15.20.5746.026 X-MS-Exchange-Inbox-Rules-Loop: yurelw(a)outlook.com X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-4734-24-msonline-outlook-c54b5.templateTenant Reporting-MTA: dns;PR3P189MB1017.EURP189.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Received-From-MTA: dns;AM7P189MB0759.EURP189.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Arrival-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 17:46:59 +0000 Final-Recipient: rfc822;y.antoniowatson(a)gmail.com Action: failed Status: 5.7.26 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550-5.7.26 The MAIL FROM domain [gmx.net] has an SPF record with a hard fail 550-5.7.26 policy (-all) but it fails to pass SPF checks with the ip: 550-5.7.26 [104.47.13.56]. To best protect our users from spam and phishing, 550-5.7.26 the message has been blocked. Please visit 550-5.7.26 https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126#authentication for more 550 5.7.26 information. r20-20020a05640251d400b0045d4b7ad162si6801981edd.546 - gsmtp Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 19:46:03 +0200 From: Wolfgang Pfeiffer <roto(a)gmx.net> Subject: Re: Mailing lists and Discourse Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users <users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> To: Community support for Fedora users <users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> User-Agent: Mutt/2.1.5 (2021-12-30) On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 08:44:20PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > I've been observing, from the sidelines, the devolution of mailing > lists, Usenet, and IRC into web-based discussion forums of various > flavors; getting the bar lowered to the level of Twooter, Spacebook, > and TokTik, and more of the same. It takes more mental effort and > discipline to participate meaningfully in the former, but much less in > the latter. It's a much lower barrier of entry; hence this latest > episode with Gnome. > Nailed it: Twooter, Spacebook, TokTik. Devolution - whatever you call it - in the West seems to be a fact in many fields. Whereas intellectually and when it comes to patents Asians are getting a lot better over the last years. 2021 more than 50% of patent filings [*] came from Asia (China 25.1%, Japan 18.1%, Republic of Korea 7.5%), USA 21.5% and Germany 6.2% - this is a total reverse from the numbers of 1994: US were No.1, Germany #2, Japan #4, Korea #18, China #21. But yes: Let's all be happy with a few butttons to press. "Press Green" > "Say yes" > "Now Go away" Wolfgang [*] https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pctndocs/en/2022/pct_news_2022_02.pdf _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ----- End forwarded message -----

10 26

Lost highlight
by Patrick Dupre 01 Nov '22

01 Nov '22

Hello, In a terminal (gnome-terminal), I used to use the mouse right button, to copy paste highlighted text. Sometimes I lost this option: the highlight odes not work. It seems to be due to xmgrace. Do you know how to recover this way of going without closing all the xmgrace terminals? Thank. =========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 | | Room# D114A ===========================================================================

3 4

Nouveau Blacklisting not in /etc/default/grub
by Stephen Morris 01 Nov '22

01 Nov '22

Hi, Having secureboot in the bios set to "Windows Mode" I have manually signed the nvidia drivers after uninstalling akmod-nvidia and kmod-nvidia and all the associated packages. I then: generated a signing key using kmodgenca ran mokutil to import the generated key rebooted And at the MOK Manager interface I enrolled the key and rebooted again Then once in KDE I reinstalled akmod-nvidia and kmod-nvidia I then ran lsmod | grep -i nvidia Does the following display from lsmod indicate that the nvidia module has not installed properly? I don't have the drm module and the blacklisting of nouveau and the nvidia modeset parameter have not been added to the kernel parameters in /etc/default/grub, or is it that I did not force a rebuild of the kernel module and I did not force an update of the boot image? lsmod | grep -i nvidia nvidia_drm 73728 32 nvidia_modeset 1187840 65 nvidia_drm nvidia_uvm 1318912 0 nvidia 55242752 2950 nvidia_uvm,nvidia_modeset regards, Steve

7 16

grub2 Question
by Robert McBroom 01 Nov '22

01 Nov '22

Running Fedora 35 and trying to fix installed boot files on a third drive. ~]# grub2-install /dev/sdc grub2-install: error: this utility cannot be used for EFI platforms because it does not support UEFI Secure Boot. Secure Boot is turned off in the bios. The boot is from UEFI.

5 7

New kernel install had issues. (6.0.5-200.fc36.x86_64)
by Doug H. 31 Oct '22

31 Oct '22

I do dnf upgrade any morning where something shows up as new. Today was the big kernel jump to 6.x kernel. Was not worried I guess since I just ran the update like normal and rebooted to it. Ended up at: error: ../../grub-core/kern/dl.c:429:symbol `grub_debug_is_enabled' not found. Entering rescue mode... gruub rescue> _ Booted to the F36 install media and did the rescue option. It found my system and setup my chroot. I simply ran: chroot /mnt/sysroot grub2-install /dev/sda (no errors) exit And rebooted to that. All seems great. Note that this is a very "old" system, having been dnf upgraded from F19 all the way to today. I notice that the grub menu looks a bit different, so it could be an issue of having an old grub on the disk that needed an update. Also note that I am pretty sure I have not rebooted since doing a disk clone from my laptop (not this system) where I mounted old and new laptop on this system and did a variety of dd, rsync, grub2-install, reset UUIDs, etc. If I accidentally touch my sda instead of the sdd and sde that I was working on then I might have created a bomb that went off at reboot. I don't *think* that happened but not 100% sure. Everything seems to be working, so I don't need any help, but wanted to report this just in case. -- Doug H.

11 13