Buck wrote:
May I ask, what alternative are you looking at? ... -----Original Message----- That's a self-contradictory statement. If a product is not protected from vulnerabilities, it is not stable enough to operate for long periods. And that's what makes Fedora unsuitable for university, non-profit, and small business server environments.
It's a good thing i'm not Michael S. :-)
I'm not looking at any particular alternatives yet - RHL9 is still supported, and my machines are staying on it for the time being. I'm waiting for RH to come up with a reasonable alternative for us non-profits.
Attn: Tom Callaway, i still haven't heard anything from anyone at Red Hat on this note...