1:31 p.m.
I just started an update of Fedora 14 by yumex, and it listed ntfsprogs
2011.4.12-5.fc14 twice. Both are from updates and are the same size.
I'm sure this is harmless, but does anybody know what's going on?
12:48 p.m.
Am 23.09.2011 19:32, schrieb Joe Zeff:
On 09/21/2011 11:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> please try "yum update" and post output, witout exactly outputs
> everybody must guess waht you mean, anyways "ntfsprogs" gets
> some "replaces" updates the last time what yum would show in
> a clean way
Whatever makes you think this would do any good? I use yumex, every
morning, and before accepting its recommendations yesterday I composed
that question to this list, copying the information exactly. You
already have all the information I have.
nice for you that you use yumex every
morning but this does nothing
change in the fact that it is only a gui-wrapper for yum while yum
is more expressive
i requested the output of "yum update" in a TERMINAL and not the
output of a grapical tool hiding informations!
this makes me not thinking that it makes anything good, but it
helps to understand your problem or even figure out that there is
no problem
10:02 a.m.
Am 23.09.2011 16:55, schrieb JB:
Reindl Harald <h.reindl <at> thelounge.net> writes:
> ...
> P.S.: the peopole who decided to moderate my mails to the list
> should consider revert this or push them a little faster instead
> of days and weeks later or silently drop them
>
> normally a moderated list anserwers instantly that it is moderated
> and also sends notifies if a message is rejected, this list is
> a randomly black hole
You did not say how you post to the list, directly or via other service.
For example, people who post via GMANE may occasionally be delayed, or after
a few days of inactivity asked to re-authenticate the "from e-mail address"
with them (you have to check you mail; ignoring responses will burn you), even
lose it due to a temporary storage space limit.
So, consider it.
directly to users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
they moderate me since many weeks ago i said some not so nice words
to a guy which thought his router can access his local-filesystem
and meant "the community should consider remove javascript for security
reasons" and did not like over hours to understand that he is missing
basic knowledge
on other mailing-lists if you are moderated:
a) you get a reply from the list that your post is moderated
b) it does not take DAYS if somebody does his job he decided to do
c) if posts are rejected you get a notify
here if you are moderated you posting in a blacklist and can cosider
to post not anymore because if you try to help somebody and your
posting will be delivered a week later it is a) useless and b) out of context
12:32 p.m.
On 09/21/2011 11:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
please try "yum update" and post output, witout exactly
outputs
everybody must guess waht you mean, anyways "ntfsprogs" gets
some "replaces" updates the last time what yum would show in
a clean way
Whatever makes you think this would do any good? I use yumex, every
morning, and before accepting its recommendations yesterday I composed
that question to this list, copying the information exactly. You
already have all the information I have.
9:55 a.m.
Reindl Harald <h.reindl <at> thelounge.net> writes:
...
P.S.: the peopole who decided to moderate my mails to the list
should consider revert this or push them a little faster instead
of days and weeks later or silently drop them
normally a moderated list anserwers instantly that it is moderated
and also sends notifies if a message is rejected, this list is
a randomly black hole
You did not say how you post to the list, directly or via other service.
For example, people who post via GMANE may occasionally be delayed, or after
a few days of inactivity asked to re-authenticate the "from e-mail address"
with them (you have to check you mail; ignoring responses will burn you), even
lose it due to a temporary storage space limit.
So, consider it.
JB
2:30 p.m.
64bit and 32bit versions perhaps?
On 9/21/11 2:31 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
I just started an update of Fedora 14 by yumex, and it listed
ntfsprogs
2011.4.12-5.fc14 twice. Both are from updates and are the same size.
I'm sure this is harmless, but does anybody know what's going on?
--
Christina Salls
GLERL Computer Group
help desk (734)741-2127
voicemail (734)741-2446
2 p.m.
On 09/21/2011 01:31 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
I just started an update of Fedora 14 by yumex, and it listed
ntfsprogs
2011.4.12-5.fc14 twice. Both are from updates and are the same size.
I'm sure this is harmless, but does anybody know what's going on?
Are you
running an x86_64 system and, if so, could it perhaps be .686 and .x86_64 packages?
Kevin Martin
1:42 p.m.
Am 21.09.2011 20:31, schrieb Joe Zeff:
I just started an update of Fedora 14 by yumex, and it listed
ntfsprogs
2011.4.12-5.fc14 twice. Both are from updates and are the same size.
I'm sure this is harmless, but does anybody know what's going on?
please try "yum update" and post output, witout exactly outputs
everybody must guess waht you mean, anyways "ntfsprogs" gets
some "replaces" updates the last time what yum would show in
a clean way
P.S.: the peopole who decided to moderate my mails to the list
should consider revert this or push them a little faster instead
of days and weeks later or silently drop them
normally a moderated list anserwers instantly that it is moderated
and also sends notifies if a message is rejected, this list is
a randomly black hole
2:15 p.m.
I didn't have quite the same issue but it seems strange that ntfsrpogs
was getting replaced rather than updated (see below)
Richard
# yum update
Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, downloadonly, langpacks, presto, refresh-
: packagekit
Adding en_US to language list
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package google-chrome-beta.x86_64 0:14.0.835.186-101821 set to be updated
---> Package libgpod.x86_64 0:0.8.2-1.fc14 set to be updated
---> Package libgpod-sharp.x86_64 0:0.8.2-1.fc14 set to be updated
---> Package librsvg2.x86_64 0:2.32.0-4.fc14 set to be updated
---> Package ntfs-3g.x86_64 2:2011.4.12-5.fc14 set to be updated
---> Package ntfsprogs.x86_64 2:2011.4.12-5.fc14 set to be installed
---> Package unique.x86_64 0:1.1.6-3.fc14 set to be updated
---> Package vim-common.x86_64 2:7.3.289-1.fc14 set to be updated
---> Package vim-enhanced.x86_64 2:7.3.289-1.fc14 set to be updated
---> Package vim-filesystem.x86_64 2:7.3.289-1.fc14 set to be updated
---> Package vim-minimal.x86_64 2:7.3.289-1.fc14 set to be updated
---> Package xorg-x11-drv-savage.x86_64 0:2.3.2-3.fc14 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Dependencies Resolved
================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
================================================================================
Installing:
ntfsprogs x86_64 2:2011.4.12-5.fc14 updates 225 k
replacing ntfsprogs.x86_64 2:2011.4.12-3.fc14
Updating:
google-chrome-beta x86_64 14.0.835.186-101821 google-chrome 31 M
libgpod x86_64 0.8.2-1.fc14 updates 287 k
libgpod-sharp x86_64 0.8.2-1.fc14 updates 32 k
librsvg2 x86_64 2.32.0-4.fc14 updates 126 k
ntfs-3g x86_64 2:2011.4.12-5.fc14 updates 248 k
unique x86_64 1.1.6-3.fc14 updates 53 k
vim-common x86_64 2:7.3.289-1.fc14 updates 6.2 M
vim-enhanced x86_64 2:7.3.289-1.fc14 updates 958 k
vim-filesystem x86_64 2:7.3.289-1.fc14 updates 14 k
vim-minimal x86_64 2:7.3.289-1.fc14 updates 376 k
xorg-x11-drv-savage x86_64 2.3.2-3.fc14 updates 69 k
Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install 1 Package(s)
Upgrade 11 Package(s)
Total download size: 40 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Setting up and reading Presto delta metadata
Processing delta metadata
Download delta size: 1.0 M
(1/8): libgpod-0.8.0-3.fc14_0.8.2-1.fc14.x86_64.drpm | 88 kB 00:00
(2/8): libgpod-sharp-0.8.0-3.fc14_0.8.2-1.fc14.x86_64.dr | 11 kB 00:00
(3/8): librsvg2-2.32.0-3.fc14_2.32.0-4.fc14.x86_64.drpm | 56 kB 00:00
(4/8): ntfs-3g-2011.4.12-3.fc14_2011.4.12-5.fc14.x86_64. | 97 kB 00:00
(5/8): ntfsprogs-2011.4.12-3.fc14_2011.4.12-5.fc14.x86_6 | 176 kB 00:01
(6/8): unique-1.1.6-1.fc13_1.1.6-3.fc14.x86_64.drpm | 20 kB 00:00
(7/8): vim-common-7.3.056-1.fc14_7.3.289-1.fc14.x86_64.d | 513 kB 00:04
(8/8): xorg-x11-drv-savage-2.3.1-3.fc14_2.3.2-3.fc14.x86 | 50 kB 00:00
Finishing rebuild of rpms, from deltarpms
<delta rebuild> | 7.2 MB 00:06
Presto reduced the update size by 87% (from 7.2 M to 1.0 M).
Package(s) data still to download: 33 M
(1/4): google-chrome-beta-14.0.835.186-101821.x86_64.rpm | 31 MB 03:01
(2/4): vim-enhanced-7.3.289-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm | 958 kB 00:07
(3/4): vim-filesystem-7.3.289-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm | 14 kB 00:00
(4/4): vim-minimal-7.3.289-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm | 376 kB 00:03
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 173 kB/s | 33 MB 03:13
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Transaction Test Succeeded
Running Transaction
Updating : 2:ntfs-3g-2011.4.12-5.fc14.x86_64 1/24
Updating : libgpod-0.8.2-1.fc14.x86_64 2/24
Installing : 2:ntfsprogs-2011.4.12-5.fc14.x86_64 3/24
Updating : 2:vim-minimal-7.3.289-1.fc14.x86_64 4/24
Updating : unique-1.1.6-3.fc14.x86_64 5/24
Updating : xorg-x11-drv-savage-2.3.2-3.fc14.x86_64 6/24
Updating : librsvg2-2.32.0-4.fc14.x86_64 7/24
Updating : 2:vim-filesystem-7.3.289-1.fc14.x86_64 8/24
Updating : 2:vim-common-7.3.289-1.fc14.x86_64 9/24
Updating : 2:vim-enhanced-7.3.289-1.fc14.x86_64 10/24
Updating : libgpod-sharp-0.8.2-1.fc14.x86_64 11/24
Updating : google-chrome-beta-14.0.835.186-101821.x86_64 12/24
job 20 at Wed Sep 21 09:59:00 2011
Cleanup : 2:vim-enhanced-7.3.056-1.fc14.x86_64 13/24
Cleanup : 2:vim-common-7.3.056-1.fc14.x86_64 14/24
Cleanup : 2:ntfsprogs-2011.4.12-3.fc14.x86_64 15/24
Cleanup : 2:ntfs-3g-2011.4.12-3.fc14.x86_64 16/24
Cleanup : 2:vim-minimal-7.3.056-1.fc14.x86_64 17/24
Cleanup : unique-1.1.6-1.fc13.x86_64 18/24
Cleanup : xorg-x11-drv-savage-2.3.1-3.fc14.x86_64 19/24
Cleanup : librsvg2-2.32.0-3.fc14.x86_64 20/24
Cleanup : libgpod-sharp-0.8.0-3.fc14.x86_64 21/24
Cleanup : libgpod-0.8.0-3.fc14.x86_64 22/24
Cleanup : 2:vim-filesystem-7.3.056-1.fc14.x86_64 23/24
Cleanup : google-chrome-beta-14.0.835.163-101024.x86_64 24/24
Installed:
ntfsprogs.x86_64 2:2011.4.12-5.fc14
Updated:
google-chrome-beta.x86_64 0:14.0.835.186-101821
libgpod.x86_64 0:0.8.2-1.fc14
libgpod-sharp.x86_64 0:0.8.2-1.fc14
librsvg2.x86_64 0:2.32.0-4.fc14
ntfs-3g.x86_64 2:2011.4.12-5.fc14
unique.x86_64 0:1.1.6-3.fc14
vim-common.x86_64 2:7.3.289-1.fc14
vim-enhanced.x86_64 2:7.3.289-1.fc14
vim-filesystem.x86_64 2:7.3.289-1.fc14
vim-minimal.x86_64 2:7.3.289-1.fc14
xorg-x11-drv-savage.x86_64 0:2.3.2-3.fc14
Replaced:
ntfsprogs.x86_64 2:2011.4.12-3.fc14
4625
days inactive
4627
days old
9 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Christina Salls -
JB -
Joe Zeff -
Kevin Martin -
Reindl Harald -
Richard Shaw