Tom thanks, installing on 200G, third partition of 320G, so F10 additional partitions will not be primary. thats OK I think. Steve Tom Horsley wrote:

I run FC9 as the only natively installed OS on my machine and have windows installed in a vmware (server 2.0) vm under linux. The XP performance is acceptable and it's set to suspend/resume when linux starts and stops so it's always there. It runs on a masqueraded socket, so outside network programs can't access it, which means I don't run a firewall on that windows image. I do run antivirus software there... cause you just can't trust it :) I find this to be the best way to have the necessary windows apps around when I need them: outlook and office. Its been years since I absolutely had to have windows running on bare metal. wcn Timothy Murphy wrote:

On 05/01/2009 02:50 PM, Aldo Foot wrote: You can use Extended partitions for all of Linux. Routinely, when I don't use LVM, for a Linux only system I make primary partition 1 an extended for the whole drive and use logicals for the rest of the system. Generally, Linux likes 3 filesystems (/boot, swap, and root). I always allocate /home and /usr/local a separate. Many times when you buy a Windows system, 2 partitions are dedicated, 1 for the C: drive and 1 for the D: (or restore) drive. During installfests, I normally use a partitioner (eg. gparted) to shrink the Windows C: partition, and allocate primary 3 as extended. Then I have a number of logical partitions available for Linux. I usually don't have too many choices at installfests. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf(a)blu.org&gt; Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Steven Kemp <SKemp010(a)roadrunner.com&gt; wrote: XP and Fedora install without problems on the same drive. Install XP first then Fedora. Don't forget the limitation of four primary partitions in a single drive. ~af

-----Original Message----- From: fedora-list-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Steven Kemp Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 1:32 AM To: fedora-list(a)redhat.com Subject: Fedora & XP on same machine, good bad or ugly Good Idea? on different hard drives. XP home installed now. Good, Bad or ugly? Recommendations. Steve ------------------------------------------- Steve, I've got XP, Vista and F9 installed on my main rig at home. All on separate hard drives. The installation route I took (if I can remember that far back) was to install XP first (this is a MUST, MS arrogantly assumed that no other OS would ever be installed alongside XP for some reason), then Vista, then Fedora. After the XP install, I booted off the Vista DVD and installed it with no problems. Vista uses a new bootloader to boot more than one OS, and it automatically picked up XP on my system. So, XP on /sda, Vista on /sdb with no problems. Install Fedora 9 to /sdc. Again no problems. I selected GRUB as the primary bootloader. This moved the Vista bootloader to a second area of the hard drive (I can't remember where, not on the system at the moment). The install went well and I could boot into Fedora with no problems. Vista complained, but I just inserted the DVD and repaired the bootloader (the system did it automatically, something I wasn't expecting) and I've been running all three OSs happily (well, as happily as I can get with MS) with no problems. When you install F10 on your system with XP, you'll just get a choice between F10 and XP in the GRUB menu. I get a choice between F9 and the Windows Bootloader, which then gives me the choice of XP or Vista. I'd definitely recommend separate hard drives. That way, when you have to reinstall XP, you've not got to mess around trying to avoid hosing your F10 install. Hope that helps. Andy -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list(a)redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- This email contains confidential information. The contents must not be disclosed to anyone else except with the authority of the sender. Unauthorised recipients are requested to maintain this confidentiality and immediately advise the sender of any error or misdirection in transmission. The following notice applies to emails originating in the UK. E-mails sent on behalf of AMEC are sent on behalf of the relevant AMEC company below. These are registered in England and Wales with registered office at Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, Cheshire WA16 8QZ and number as shown: AMEC plc 01675285, AMEC Group Limited 04612748, AMEC Capital Projects Limited 02804109, AMEC Earth and Environmental UK Limited 04987981, AMEC Nuclear Holdings Limited 03725076, AMEC Nuclear M & O Limited 05664844, AMEC Nuclear UK Limited 01120437, AMEC Nuclear International Limited 03260477, AMEC Nuclear Projects Limited 05664962 and National Nuclear Corporation Limited 02290928 --

Peter Langfelder wrote: I have much the same setup on my Toshiba A105-S4004, except I patched the Windows registry for the hardware clock being in UTC. I don't have the registry patch handy, but I can post it again if you need it. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!