Hi all, Bit of a cosmetic problem here. # rpm -qa selinux-policy-strict selinux-policy-strict-2.4.6-49.fc6 selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5 # rpm -qf /usr/share/selinux/strict/usbmodules.pp selinux-policy-strict-2.4.6-49.fc6 selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5 # rpm -e selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5 libsemanage.semanage_direct_remove: Module dpkg was not found. semodule: Failed on dpkg! error: %trigger(selinux-policy-strict-2.4.6-49.fc6.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 Any idea what is going on there? rpm --rebuilddb didn't help, next option is a force but I never like those.

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 12:02 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: On 09/04/07, Naoki wrote: > > Hi all, > > Bit of a cosmetic problem here. > > # rpm -qa selinux-policy-strict > selinux-policy-strict-2.4.6-49.fc6 > selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5 > > > # rpm -qf /usr/share/selinux/strict/usbmodules.pp > selinux-policy-strict-2.4.6-49.fc6 > selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5 > > > # rpm -e selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5 > libsemanage.semanage_direct_remove: Module dpkg was not > found. > semodule: Failed on dpkg! > error: %trigger(selinux-policy-strict-2.4.6-49.fc6.noarch) > scriptlet failed, exit status 1 > > > Any idea what is going on there? rpm --rebuilddb didn't help, next option > is a force but I never like those. rpm -e --notriggers --noscripts selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5 might suffice. You are correct sir! # rpm -qa selinux-policy-strict selinux-policy-strict-2.4.6-49.fc6 selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5 # rpm -e --notriggers --noscripts selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5 # rpm -qa selinux-policy-strict selinux-policy-strict-2.4.6-49.fc6 Now the question is, how did it get itself into that state? I guess the yum update from FC5->FC6 failed to remove the old package because of the scripts error.