-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org]
On Behalf Of Tom H
Sent: zondag 31 mei 2015 15:23
To: Fedora Users
Subject: Re: I'm shocked, shocked!
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Tom Horsley <horsley1953(a)gmail.com> wrote:
To see that the "predictable" network name for my one and only
ethernet port has changed once again.
On fedora 22 eno1 is what used to be em1.
That's because you've moved from one "predictable" scheme to
another...
em1 is a name assigned by biosdevname where "em" stands for
"embedded"
(although I've seen an "ethernet on motherboard" explanation) and the
generic name is "em<port_number>". The other biosdevname option is
"p<slot_number>p<port_number> where the first "p" stands for
"pci".
eno1 is a name assigned by udev where "en" stands for ethernet and
"o"
for onboard. From "man systemd.link":
<<snip>>
-----Original Message-----
So, if you use Ethernet connection, based on the same sort of hardware, but one located on
the MOBO, one on a PCI-card and one on a USB-connector, they all got different names.
That's bad.
But even worse, it means that scripts designed for totally hardware agnostic
configuration, now should determine where a piece of hardware is located. That's the
inverse of progress....
I wonder if "old" behavior (like ETHnn) can be retrieved by NamePolicy
="database"
HW.
______________________________________________________________________
Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de
geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat
aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen
aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's
verbonden aan het electronisch verzenden van berichten.
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the
addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the
sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind
resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.