On 4/28/2004 10:35 AM, info wrote: It is legal, yes. -- David Collantes - College of Business Administration, UCF - (407)823-3418

Well, I had some people tell me that it was illegal, but I didn't know the details. Hey, never hurts to ask I use the software, I'm not real familiar with the licensing and GPL. Guess I better read up........... On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, -=Brian Truter=- wrote:

No, just someone who likes macs and thinks they know it all my boss................. On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Robin Laing wrote:

On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 09:39, -=Brian Truter=- wrote: Well, there has been some concern about the DRM zealots wanting to outlaw Linux and other OSS (partly due to cracks such as libdvdcss, mpg321, and other questionably legal codecs) but now that Linus has spoken on the matter, guess we'll survive. (o: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/04/29/linus_torvalds_blesses_drm/ Phil

At 08:39 AM 4/28/04 -0500, -=Brian Truter=- wrote: I suspect that the original poster is worried by rumors about the SCO situation. I wouldn't worry about that. First, SCO knows they have no case. That's why they've been so hesitant to say exactly which pieces of Linux they are laying claim to owning. Now that a few actual claims have been forced out of them in court, and found to be groundless, they have even less credibility. Some of the original authors have stepped forward and offered to testify that the software SCO is claiming is in the public domain, and has been for decades. It wasn't written by SCO to start with, and the folks who did write it gave it away. Even with MicroSoft's financial backing, taking on IBM in court is a pretty non-trivial exercise, even if you do have a good case, and it doesn't appear that SCO does. By the time the case gets out of court, most of us will be running walkers, not computers...unless SCO realizes it's a pointless exercise and just fold up their tents and blow away. Let's say that the worst case scenario appears, and SCO does manage to prove, in court, that some part of Linux is using code that they have legal title to. How long do you think it will be before that bit of code is no longer in Linux? A bigger threat might be software patents, but I haven't heard any claims against Linux along those lines, and that would seem to be a bigger problem for commercial versions of Linux than with Linux itself (i.e. if you are making money selling it, you might need to look into the patent and licensing area, but if you are just using it for personal purposes and not making any money off of the software itself (i.e. not selling Linux), you probably have nothing to worry about. It's like a patented light switch design...if I make one myself and install it in my store to run the lights, no problem, but if I make lots of them and sell them in my store, I'll need to make arrangements with the patent holder and pay some royalties. Note: I am not a lawyer. I have not read all international treaties on copyright and patents. The above is just my current understanding of the situation. Anyone who is a lawyer and who has read all international treaties on copyright and patents who wants to correct me on anything in the above is welcome, and encouraged, to do so. -- Mike Bartman

well I thought that was right. just had someone that doesn't know what they are talking about On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Matthew Miller wrote: