Re: (fedora) Re: mismatch in hdf packages prevent upgrade from F30->F31 - users - Fedora Mailing-Lists

Thursday, 7 November 2019

Ed Greshko wrote on 7-NOV-2019 12:04:26.12

...
On 11/7/19 6:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> On an F31 system and it seems like netcdf is the most logical choice. 
I removed the netcdf*.i686 packeages and that solved the problem.

...
>
> On my F31, I get
>
> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires hdf [snip]
...
Oh, I did have a F30 VM available so for completeness I get...
[egreshko@f30g ~]$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires hdf
Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:00 ago on Thu 07 Nov 2019 06:48:27 PM CST.
hdf-devel-0:4.2.14-2.fc30.i686
hdf-devel-0:4.2.14-2.fc30.x86_64 
Thanks for finding out. A classical "chicken and egg" problem: You need F31
to find out but only have F30!!!

               regards
	           Jouk

Pax, vel iniusta, utilior est quam iustissimum bellum.
    (free after Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 b.Chr.-46 b.Chr.)
     Epistularum ad Atticum 7.1.4.3)

               Touch not the cat bot a glove

...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<

  Jouk Jansen

  joukj(a)hrem.nano.tudelft.nl

  Technische Universiteit Delft        tttttttttt  uu     uu  ddddddd
  Kavli Institute of Nanoscience       tttttttttt  uu     uu  dd    dd
  Nationaal centrum voor HREM              tt      uu     uu  dd     dd
  Lorentzweg 1                             tt      uu     uu  dd     dd
  2628 CJ Delft                            tt      uu     uu  dd     dd
  Nederland                                tt      uu     uu  dd    dd
  tel. 31-15-2782272                       tt       uuuuuuu   ddddddd

...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<