6:11 p.m.
I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and
the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does
anyone have any idea what is going on?
6:23 p.m.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500
Bill Cunningham wrote:
I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include
and
the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does
anyone have any idea what is going on?
On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers:
zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch
6:40 p.m.
On 1/29/2024 7:23 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500
Bill Cunningham wrote:
> I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and
> the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
> glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does
> anyone have any idea what is going on?
On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers:
zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch
I tried dnf reinstall with that rpm. It (stdio.h) still isn't in
/usr/include. I'm really at a loss here with this one.
B
2:53 a.m.
On 1/30/24 01:40, Bill Cunningham wrote:
On 1/29/2024 7:23 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h
> glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch
I tried dnf reinstall with that rpm. It (stdio.h) still isn't in /usr/include.
I'm really at a loss here with this one.
rpm -V glibc-headers
--
Roberto Ragusa mail at robertoragusa.it
8:22 p.m.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500
Bill Cunningham wrote:
> I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and
> the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
> glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does
> anyone have any idea what is going on?
On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers:
zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch
$ dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-x86-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : \
Additional internal header files for glibc-devel.
Do you also have glibc-devel installed?
--
Jon H. LaBadie jonfu(a)jgcomp.com
2:54 p.m.
On 1/29/2024 9:22 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500
> Bill Cunningham wrote:
>
>> I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and
>> the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
>> glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does
>> anyone have any idea what is going on?
>
> On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers:
>
> zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h
> glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch
$ dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-x86-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : \
Additional internal header files for glibc-devel.
Do you also have glibc-devel installed?
Yes I have glibc-devel installed too. I typed the dnf provides
/use/include/stdio.h and the same rpm was reported. glibc-headers
B
11:21 p.m.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 03:54:50PM -0500, Bill Cunningham wrote:
On 1/29/2024 9:22 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500
>> Bill Cunningham wrote:
>>
>>> I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and
>>> the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
>>> glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does
>>> anyone have any idea what is going on?
>>
>> On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers:
>>
>> zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h
>> glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch
>
> $ dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h
> glibc-headers-x86-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : \
> Additional internal header files for glibc-devel.
>
> Do you also have glibc-devel installed?
>
Yes I have glibc-devel installed too. I typed the dnf provides
/use/include/stdio.h and the same rpm was reported. glibc-headers
Have you tried the "--verify" option of rpm to check if stdio.h
is an isolated problem?
$ rpm --verify glibc-headers-x86
$ rpm --verify glibc-devel.x86_64
After renaming stdio.h the first command reports it as missing.
Observation Oddity: glibc-headers uses -x86
whereas most packages use .x86 (dash vs dot)
--
Jon H. LaBadie jonfu(a)jgcomp.com
1:21 a.m.
Hi.
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:21:50 -0500 Jon LaBadie wrote:
$ rpm --verify glibc-headers-x86
$ rpm --verify glibc-devel.x86_64
After renaming stdio.h the first command reports it as missing.
Observation Oddity: glibc-headers uses -x86
whereas most packages use .x86 (dash vs dot)
The reason is that the name of the glibc-headers RPM is in fact
glibc-headers-x86
rpm -qi glibc-headers-x86
Name : glibc-headers-x86
Version : 2.38
Release : 14.fc39
<snip>
Description :
The glibc-headers-x86 package contains the architecture-specific
header files which cannot be included in glibc-devel package.
--
francis
12:51 p.m.
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:21:50 -0500 Jon LaBadie wrote:
> Observation Oddity: glibc-headers uses -x86
> whereas most packages use .x86 (dash vs dot)
The reason is that the name of the glibc-headers RPM is in fact
glibc-headers-x86
rpm -qi glibc-headers-x86
Name : glibc-headers-x86
Version : 2.38
Release : 14.fc39
<snip>
Description :
The glibc-headers-x86 package contains the architecture-specific
header files which cannot be included in glibc-devel package.
Ahh, and the x86 (actually x86_64) following the "dot" are
architecture. Thanks.
--
Jon H. LaBadie jonfu(a)jgcomp.com
3:16 p.m.
On 1/31/2024 12:21 AM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 03:54:50PM -0500, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>
> On 1/29/2024 9:22 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:11:26 -0500
>>> Bill Cunningham wrote:
>>>
>>>> I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include
>>>> and
>>>> the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
>>>> glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present.
>>>> Does
>>>> anyone have any idea what is going on?
>>>
>>> On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers:
>>>
>>> zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h
>>> glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch
>>
>> $ dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h
>> glibc-headers-x86-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : \
>> Additional internal header files for glibc-devel.
>>
>> Do you also have glibc-devel installed?
>>
> Yes I have glibc-devel installed too. I typed the dnf provides
> /use/include/stdio.h and the same rpm was reported. glibc-headers
>
Have you tried the "--verify" option of rpm to check if stdio.h
is an isolated problem?
$ rpm --verify glibc-headers-x86
$ rpm --verify glibc-devel.x86_64
After renaming stdio.h the first command reports it as missing.
Yes I used --verify as an rpm switch and all the files including stdio.h
were in the rpm. So I tried 'dnf reinstall
glibc-headers[-x86-2.38-14.fc49]. And all installed. what is in brackets
I have left off before; thinking that the installation setup (anaconda)
was smart enough to know what rpm to install and what arch my system is.
So that is fixed now, but, I am still wondering why the installation of
the system didn't install these rpms. I chose the option "C Development
Tools" at install. hm.
> Observation Oddity: glibc-headers uses -x86
> whereas most packages use .x86 (dash vs dot)
>
3:28 a.m.
On 30 Jan 2024, at 00:23, Tom Horsley <horsley1953(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers:
zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch
--
On mine its from glibc-devel not glibc-headers...
: [1] root $ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 39 (Thirty Nine)
: 09:27:56 armf39 ~
: [1] root $ rpm -qf /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-devel-2.38-14.fc39.aarch64
Barry
3:30 a.m.
On 30 Jan 2024, at 09:28, Barry Scott <barry(a)barrys-emacs.org>
wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2024, at 00:23, Tom Horsley <horsley1953(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On my system /usr/include/stdio.h is in glibc-headers:
>
> zooty> rpm -q -f /usr/include/stdio.h
> glibc-headers-x86-2.38-14.fc39.noarch
> --
On mine its from glibc-devel not glibc-headers...
: [1] root $ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 39 (Thirty Nine)
: 09:27:56 armf39 ~
: [1] root $ rpm -qf /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-devel-2.38-14.fc39.aarch64
And if I try to install glibc-headers I see this...
$ dnf install glibc-headers
Last metadata expiration check: 4:18:49 ago on Tue 30 Jan 2024 05:10:50 GMT.
Package glibc-devel-2.38-14.fc39.aarch64 is already installed.
Dependencies resolved.
Nothing to do.
Complete!
Barry
8:15 p.m.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 7:12 PM Bill Cunningham <bill.cu1234(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include
and
the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does
anyone have any idea what is going on?
I'm on f38 vs f39, but I get:
$ sudo dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h
[sudo] password for [deleted]:
Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:29 ago on Mon 29 Jan 2024 09:02:39 PM EST.
glibc-headers-s390-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for
: glibc-devel.
Repo : fedora
Matched from:
Filename : /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-s390-2.37-16.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for
: glibc-devel.
Repo : updates
Matched from:
Filename : /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-x86-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for
: glibc-devel.
Repo : fedora
Matched from:
Filename : /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-x86-2.37-16.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for
: glibc-devel.
Repo : @System
Matched from:
Filename : /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-x86-2.37-16.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for
: glibc-devel.
Repo : updates
Matched from:
Filename : /usr/include/stdio.h
2:56 p.m.
On 1/29/2024 9:15 PM, Go Canes wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 7:12 PM Bill Cunningham
<bill.cu1234(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I installed from scratch fedora 39. Now I looked in /usr/include and
> the usual development headers aren't there. glibc-headers and
> glibc-devel are both installed. No standard C headers are present. Does
> anyone have any idea what is going on?
I'm on f38 vs f39, but I get:
$ sudo dnf provides /usr/include/stdio.h
[sudo] password for [deleted]:
Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:29 ago on Mon 29 Jan 2024 09:02:39 PM EST.
glibc-headers-s390-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for
: glibc-devel.
Repo : fedora
Matched from:
Filename : /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-s390-2.37-16.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for
: glibc-devel.
Repo : updates
Matched from:
Filename : /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-x86-2.37-1.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for
: glibc-devel.
Repo : fedora
Matched from:
Filename : /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-x86-2.37-16.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for
: glibc-devel.
Repo : @System
Matched from:
Filename : /usr/include/stdio.h
glibc-headers-x86-2.37-16.fc38.noarch : Additional internal header files for
: glibc-devel.
Repo : updates
Matched from:
Filename : /usr/include/stdio.h
The repos reported were fedora, updates, and rpmfusion's tainted-free
98
days inactive
99
days old
13 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Barry Scott -
Bill Cunningham -
Francis.Montagnac＠inria.fr -
Go Canes -
Jon LaBadie -
Roberto Ragusa -
Tom Horsley