I did respond to your last email, this is additional...
I don't normally top post, but in this situation I thought it
appropriate:
I found the following:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-live-install-to-hard-drive-...
Which is exactly what I am seeing.
reboot as required.
I think what I should do is unplug the sda and sdb drives from the
computer (/home only).
sdc and sdd are 120G ssd's and only have the OS.
clear the partitions on sdc and sdd and install
plugin the sda/sdb drives back in for /home and add to /etc/fstab
That should take care of the UUID problems.
I did as above except for clearing the partitions on sdd2 sdc2 which is the raid1
for the OS and everything worked correctly.
No UUID error, does disconnecting the /home drives sda sdb make a difference?
In my situation, it helped that I had separate raid1's for OS and /home.
This fixed my problem but since others might have raid / and /home on the same HDD I do
not know if I should mark this as SOLVED?
Any thoughts on this?
The raid1 (sdd2/sdc2) was created during the install (anaconda) notice both drives have
the same UUID.
Listing of UUID's:
/dev/sdd2: UUID="9a61854c-c850-947e-a646-6447c94fbdd3"
UUID_SUB="4139a198-5809-ac9b-4d4f-fea766bf4975"
LABEL="star1.home.com:root" TYPE="linux_raid_member"
PARTUUID="c422c703-0776-4477-9a12-45fb3d8635d4"
/dev/sdc2: UUID="9a61854c-c850-947e-a646-6447c94fbdd3"
UUID_SUB="b7e4f7de-9aa9-f33b-a7ba-81fabc16bf90"
LABEL="star1.home.com:root" TYPE="linux_raid_member"
PARTUUID="ef0add0a-9fa7-48c0-aacd-b540189554a9"
/dev/sdb2: UUID="a92ca2fd-998f-d542-feb8-59fa8bd7ab33"
UUID_SUB="dc6884eb-956e-aa80-8b52-5656365517d1"
LABEL="star11.home.com:home" TYPE="linux_raid_member"
PARTUUID="0009d086-02"
/dev/sda2: UUID="a92ca2fd-998f-d542-feb8-59fa8bd7ab33"
UUID_SUB="748fd654-f6a6-b72e-dab0-75dfb8b9f1af"
LABEL="star11.home.com:home" TYPE="linux_raid_member"
PARTUUID="0009d086-02"
[cs@star1 data2]$ lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS
sda 8:0 1 931.5G 0 disk
└─sda2 8:2 1 916.9G 0 part
└─md126 9:126 0 916.7G 0 raid1 /home
sdb 8:16 1 931.5G 0 disk
├─sdb1 8:17 1 14.7G 0 part
└─sdb2 8:18 1 916.9G 0 part
└─md126 9:126 0 916.7G 0 raid1 /home
sdc 8:32 0 111.8G 0 disk
├─sdc1 8:33 0 1M 0 part
└─sdc2 8:34 0 111.8G 0 part
└─md127 9:127 0 111.7G 0 raid1 /
sdd 8:48 0 111.8G 0 disk
├─sdd1 8:49 0 1M 0 part
└─sdd2 8:50 0 111.8G 0 part
└─md127 9:127 0 111.7G 0 raid1 /
Thanks for your help,
David
---- On Mon, 01 May 2023 16:48:25 -0500 david woodyard
<david.woodyard(a)rdwoodyard.com> wrote ---
---- On Mon, 01 May 2023 16:12:20 -0500 Peter Boy
<mailto:pboy@uni-bremen.de> wrote ---
> Am 01.05.2023 um 22:22 schrieb David Woodyard
> <mailto:dwoody5654@gmail.com>:
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 11:33 AM David Woodyard
> <mailto:dwoody5654@gmail.com> wrote: the server is what I need to
> install.
>
> David
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 11:28 AM Peter Boy
> <mailto:pboy@uni-bremen.de> wrote:
>
>
> > Am 01.05.2023 um 18:12 schrieb David Woodyard
> > <mailto:dwoody5654@gmail.com>:
> >
> > I have searched the web for a solution and have found nothing on
> > this topic. The error I get is sda1 and sdb1 have the same UUID.
> > I would rather not remove a drive from raid and unplug it to do
> > the install.
> >
> > I must be missing something.
>
> It’s a well proven procedure. What do you want to install?
> Workstation, Server, one of the Spins?
>
> Gmail has deleted your second reply, so I am replying to this one.
I suppose you mean my last reply. I add it at the bottom.
>
> I, perhaps, was not as clear as I should have been on my first
> email. I have a computer that has a raid1 and it has been working
> for several years. I want to install Fedora-Server 37. When I run
> the install (anaconda) it gives an error about duplicate UUID's and
> will not do the install.
>
> That tells me that I can not install on a computer that ALREADY has
> raid1. I was not expecting that error.
>
> Is it correct that anaconda can NOT install to a hard drive that
> ALREADY has a RAID1? Is there a workaround other than removing one
> drive from the raid and unplugging it from the computer?
No, that’s not correct. I think, no system can use 2 disk which have
the same UUID at the same time (besides maybe one of the Windows BIOS
fake controller). Duplicate UUID is a contradictio in adiecto and
should be fixed. Anaconda can install on existing raid anyway. And
there are several ways to fix the issue with the UUID. But I have to
know more details. First question is, which of your disks is affected
and what is the output of 'fdisk -l'.
I deleted /dev/sdb1 (see blkid output after fdisk-l output) to get
rid of the UUID error another UUID error occurred because of another
raid1, that is when I stopped trying anaconda.
After fdisk -l there is a bklid output as well
Disk /dev/sda: 931.51 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors
Disk model: WDC WD10EZEX-08W
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x0009d086
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 2048 30738431 30736384 14.7G 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 30738432 1953523711 1922785280 916.9G fd Linux raid
autodetect
Disk /dev/sdb: 931.51 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors
Disk model: ST1000DM003-1ER1
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x0009d086
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sdb2 30738432 1953523711 1922785280 916.9G fd Linux raid
autodetect
Disk /dev/sdc: 111.79 GiB, 120034123776 bytes, 234441648 sectors
Disk model: Patriot Burst
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x2bca7198
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sdc1 * 2048 234441647 234439600 111.8G 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sdd: 111.79 GiB, 120034123776 bytes, 234441648 sectors
Disk model: Patriot Burst
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xc7ede561
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sdd1 * 2048 234441647 234439600 111.8G 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sde: 28.64 GiB, 30752636928 bytes, 60063744 sectors
Disk model: Ultra
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: EAECC2D5-8FE6-4C20-96D9-9044734B1928
Device Start End Sectors Size Type
/dev/sde1 2048 4095 2048 1M BIOS boot
/dev/sde2 4096 60061695 60057600 28.6G Linux filesystem
Disk /dev/zram0: 8 GiB, 8589934592 bytes, 2097152 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 4096 = 4096 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk /dev/md0: 111.73 GiB, 119964893184 bytes, 234306432 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk /dev/md127: 916.73 GiB, 984331845632 bytes, 1922523136 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
blkid output: has UUID, UUID_SUB, PARTUUID
/dev/sdd1: UUID="2485c56c-c073-e680-ecc5-cd786aa01699"
UUID_SUB="87595d10-1fb4-b431-ed8f-ecb52dfb39e0"
LABEL="star1.home.com:0" TYPE="linux_raid_member"
PARTUUID="c7ede561-01"
/dev/sdc1: UUID="2485c56c-c073-e680-ecc5-cd786aa01699"
UUID_SUB="7b55919e-4cca-3575-b6ce-f0a0749ff897"
LABEL="star1.home.com:0" TYPE="linux_raid_member"
PARTUUID="2bca7198-01"
/dev/sdb2: UUID="a92ca2fd-998f-d542-feb8-59fa8bd7ab33"
UUID_SUB="748fd654-f6a6-b72e-dab0-75dfb8b9f1af"
LABEL="star11.home.com:home" TYPE="linux_raid_member"
PARTUUID="0009d086-02"
/dev/sda2: UUID="a92ca2fd-998f-d542-feb8-59fa8bd7ab33"
UUID_SUB="dc6884eb-956e-aa80-8b52-5656365517d1"
LABEL="star11.home.com:home" TYPE="linux_raid_member"
PARTUUID="0009d086-02"
/dev/sda1: UUID="19e00749-fb48-4708-8c7f-20378bc9ac03"
BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="0009d086-01"
/dev/sdb1 does not exist because I removed it from the raid and then
deleted the partition
/dev/md0: UUID="90d875a6-2643-434b-88f6-e51d8a5324ac"
BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4"
/dev/sde2: UUID="eab43a73-d799-470a-9355-f6a518aadf8b"
BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4"
PARTUUID="f83f8fd2-d7f4-4216-ae8f-8334a7f19461"
/dev/md127: UUID="8d1f20a0-33a5-426f-aef0-2d40f1aac2b3"
BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4"
/dev/zram0: LABEL="zram0"
UUID="7f6046f8-bcbf-4000-b45e-0b4fbd967f74"
TYPE="swap"
/dev/sde1 if the usb drive I am using to boot the computer.
/dev/sde1: PARTUUID="1a6240c3-8fb0-4d03-b803-a751bcf65726"
Thanks,
David
> - - - - - repeating my previous post - - - - - - <
>> Am 01.05.2023 um 19:39 schrieb David Woodyard
>> <mailto:dwoody5654@gmail.com>:
>>
>> ...
>> Fedora is the only OS.
>
> That’s good. So it is quite easy.
>
>>
>> Second bunch of questions:
>>
>> (a)
>> Do you need to keep data? If yes, how they are stored? On its own
>> partition? Both / and /home has raid1.
>> / of course will be over written. /home needs to be preserved.
>
> That’s not so good, but perfectly doable. Keeping sda2/sdb2 and
> mounting as /home may cause some headaches in the long run, in
> organizational and administrative terms. But does not affect the
> reliability.
>
> Maybe, you study
>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-server/installation/#_storage...
> and
>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-server/installation/interacti...
>
> If you haven’t already done so.
>
>
>>
>>
>> If not, is there anything against completely restructuring the
>> hard disks? Then you wouldn't have to worry about the UUID at all.
>>
>> (b) how are the disk currently formatted, what is the output of
>>
>> Formatted as ext4 for everything.
>>
>> lsblk
>>
>> NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS
>> sda 8:0 1 931.5G 0 disk
>> ├─sda1 8:1 1 14.7G 0 part
>> └─sda2 8:2 1 916.9G 0 part
>> └─md127 9:127 0 916.7G 0 raid1 /home
>> sdb 8:16 1 931.5G 0 disk
>> └─sdb2 8:18 1 916.9G 0 part
>> └─md127 9:127 0 916.7G 0 raid1 /home
>> sdc 8:32 0 111.8G 0 disk
>> └─sdc1 8:33 0 111.8G 0 part
>> └─md0 9:0 0 111.7G 0 raid1
>> sdd 8:48 0 111.8G 0 disk
>> └─sdd1 8:49 0 111.8G 0 part
>> └─md0 9:0 0 111.7G 0 raid1
>> sde 8:64 1 28.6G 0 disk
>> ├─sde1 8:65 1 1M 0 part
>> └─sde2 8:66 1 28.6G 0 part /
>> zram0 252:0 0 8G 0 disk [SWAP]
>>
>> The sde drive is a usb that I am using to boot with until I get
>> the hdd fixed.
>
>
> The Harddisks are <2 TB and it looks like a DOS/MBR partitioning.
> Fedora nowadays used GPT for all disks. As said, you can keep
> DOS/MBR, but may cause organizational and administrative problems
> later due to the different default partitioning.
>
> Another issue:
>
> (a)
> sdb has just sdb2, no sdb1. So we have to know, how it is
> partitioned in detail to determine, how we can use the disk as part
> of a raid.
>
>
> (b)
> Regarding the mentioned UUID issue you have to check the disk ID.
>
> Therefore, use as root / with rood permission (sudo -i)
>
> fdisk -l | less
>
>
> You can scroll up and down to check all partition entries.
>
> Would be good if you could post the listing here
>
>
> Another question:
>
> how do you use sdc/sdd ? They are raid type 1 as well. but
> obviously not mounted anywhere.
>
>
>
> To install Fedora Server you have several options:
>
> (a) To create a Raid of 14 GB on sda and sdb, format at as xfs (no
> LVM as Fedora uses by default) and use it as the root file system
> for system data. Mount the raid on sda2 und sdb2 as /home in the
> root file system. That’s a bit tricky, but nevertheless just a
> series of several step-by-step actions.
>
> (b) Install the system (root file system) just on sda1 without raid
> (and therefore without redundancy in case of a disk failure for the
> system files) and mount the current raid on /home. That’s the
> easiest way.
>
> (c) If you don’t use sdc/sdd, then install Fedora on those disk,
> and - again - mount sda2/sdb2 as /home. That’s quite easy as well.
>
> (d) Backup /home, completely reformat the disks and restore /home.
>
>
> Comparing the alternatives:
>
> (c) seems the best solution if you can completely overwrite disks
> sdc/sdd.
>
> (b) is best, if you mainly want to play around and explore Fedora
> Server
>
> (a) Is best if you want to seriously use Fedora Server, but without
> touching you precious data (provided you can add a partition to sdb
> as required).
>
> (d) is best if you want a long term solution in line with Fedora's
> development and administrative principles and (upcomming)
> administrative tools.
>
> That’s your choice.