4:51 p.m.
(f36)
Good afternoon,
A short while ago, I did my weekly patches (dnf upgrade), and then
re-booted. Just before that, the workstation display (dual monitor) was
fine. After the reboot, only one display works. If I switch the monitor
cables, I still get a one-monitor display, but on the other monitor.
This leads me to think that the problem is not with the monitors. The
display in the one monitor looks a little fuzzy and stretched out
horizontally. I also notice at the end of the boot log the following lines:
-----
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m] (2 of 3) Job plymouth-quit-wait.ser…tart
running (1min 17s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m*[0m] (2 of 3) Job
plymouth-quit-wait.ser…tart running (1min 17s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m* [0m] (3 of 3) Job
akmods.service/start running (1min 18s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m* [0m] (3 of 3) Job
akmods.service/start running (1min 18s / no limit)
M
[K[[0;32m OK [0m] Finished [0;1;39makmods.service[0…all new kmods
from akmod packages.
[K Starting [0;1;39mnvidia-fallback.s… nouveau as nvidia did
not load...
[[0;32m OK [0m] Finished [0;1;39mnvidia-fallback.s…to nouveau as
nvidia did not load.
Starting [0;1;39mgdm.service[0m - GNOME Display Manager...
[[0;32m OK [0m] Started [0;1;39mgdm.service[0m - GNOME Display
Manager.
-----
(first and last lines are for context only)
I can't memorize fast enough, but I did notice during the last boot
lines very much like (or identical to?) the lines above that mentioned
"nvidia".
What is the problem?
More important, how do I fix it?
thanks,
Bill.
4:59 p.m.
On 3 Nov 2022, at 21:53, home user <mattisonw(a)comcast.net>
wrote:
(f36)
Good afternoon,
A short while ago, I did my weekly patches (dnf upgrade), and then re-booted. Just
before that, the workstation display (dual monitor) was fine. After the reboot, only one
display works. If I switch the monitor cables, I still get a one-monitor display, but on
the other monitor. This leads me to think that the problem is not with the monitors. The
display in the one monitor looks a little fuzzy and stretched out horizontally. I also
notice at the end of the boot log the following lines:
-----
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m] (2 of 3) Job plymouth-quit-wait.ser…tart running (1min
17s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m*[0m] (2 of 3) Job plymouth-quit-wait.ser…tart
running (1min 17s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m* [0m] (3 of 3) Job akmods.service/start running
(1min 18s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m* [0m] (3 of 3) Job akmods.service/start running
(1min 18s / no limit)
M
[K[[0;32m OK [0m] Finished [0;1;39makmods.service[0…all new kmods from akmod
packages.
[K Starting [0;1;39mnvidia-fallback.s… nouveau as nvidia did not load...
[[0;32m OK [0m] Finished [0;1;39mnvidia-fallback.s…to nouveau as nvidia did not
load.
Seems that you want to use the nvidia driver but it is not compiled and so the fallback
nouveau is used.
Guess nouveau does not support 2 monitors.
Find the akmod logs for the nvidia build and see if there is a clue about what went
wrong.
Barry
Starting [0;1;39mgdm.service[0m - GNOME Display
Manager...
[[0;32m OK [0m] Started [0;1;39mgdm.service[0m - GNOME Display Manager.
-----
(first and last lines are for context only)
I can't memorize fast enough, but I did notice during the last boot lines very much
like (or identical to?) the lines above that mentioned "nvidia".
What is the problem?
More important, how do I fix it?
thanks,
Bill.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
5:16 p.m.
Barry composed on 2022-11-03 21:59 (UTC):
Seems that you want to use the nvidia driver but it is not compiled
and so the fallback nouveau is used.
Guess nouveau does not support 2 monitors.
Nouveau supports 2 monitors, but not when NVidia drivers interfere by blacklisting
nouveau, which prevents fallback to FOSS:
# xdriinfo
Screen 0: nouveau
# pinxi -GSaz --zl --hostname
System:
Host: gb970 Kernel: 5.19.17-200.fc36.x86_64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64
compiler: gcc v: 2.37-36.fc36 parameters: ro root=LABEL=<filter> audit=0
ipv6.disable=1 net.ifnames=0 audit=0 plymouth.enable=0 noresume
mitigations=auto consoleblank=0 selinux=0
Desktop: Trinity v: R14.0.12 tk: Qt v: 3.5.0 info: kicker wm: Twin v: 3.0
vt: 7 dm: 1: TDM 2: XDM Distro: Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six)
Graphics:
Device-1: NVIDIA GF108 [GeForce GT 630] vendor: Gigabyte driver: nouveau
v: kernel non-free: series: 390.xx+ status: legacy-active (EOL~late 2022)
arch: Fermi code: GF1xx process: 40/28nm built: 2010-16 pcie: gen: 1
speed: 2.5 GT/s lanes: 16 ports: active: DVI-I-1,HDMI-A-1 empty: VGA-1
bus-ID: 01:00.0 chip-ID: 10de:0f00 class-ID: 0300 temp: 49.0 C
Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 1.20.14 driver: X: loaded: modesetting
unloaded: fbdev,vesa dri: nouveau gpu: nouveau display-ID: :0 screens: 1
Screen-1: 0 s-res: 3600x1200 s-dpi: 120 s-size: 761x253mm (29.96x9.96")
s-diag: 802mm (31.57")
Monitor-1: DVI-I-1 pos: primary,left model: NEC EA243WM serial: <filter>
built: 2011 res: 1920x1200 hz: 60 dpi: 94 gamma: 1.2
size: 519x324mm (20.43x12.76") diag: 612mm (24.1") ratio: 16:10 modes:
max: 1920x1200 min: 640x480
Monitor-2: HDMI-A-1 mapped: HDMI-1 pos: right model: Dell P2213
serial: <filter> built: 2012 res: 1680x1050 hz: 60 dpi: 90 gamma: 1.2
size: 473x296mm (18.62x11.65") diag: 558mm (22") ratio: 16:10 modes:
max: 1680x1050 min: 720x400
API: OpenGL v: 4.3 Mesa 22.1.7 renderer: NVC1 direct render: Yes
Installation of NVidia's proprietary drivers block use of any of the /several/
existing nouveau FOSS driver types:
kernel
DDX # optional, in place of above "modesetting" DIX display default
dri
Mesa
--
Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion,
based on faith, not based on science.
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata
5:44 p.m.
On 11/3/22 3:59 PM, Barry wrote:
> On 3 Nov 2022, at 21:53, home user <mattisonw(a)comcast.net> wrote:
[... snip ...]
> [K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m* [0m] (3 of 3) Job
akmods.service/start running (1min 18s / no limit)
> M
> [K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m* [0m] (3 of 3) Job akmods.service/start running
(1min 18s / no limit)
> M
> [K[[0;32m OK [0m] Finished [0;1;39makmods.service[0…all new kmods from akmod
packages.
> [K Starting [0;1;39mnvidia-fallback.s… nouveau as nvidia did not load...
> [[0;32m OK [0m] Finished [0;1;39mnvidia-fallback.s…to nouveau as nvidia did not
load.
Seems that you want to use the nvidia driver but it is not compiled and so the fallback
nouveau is used.
Guess nouveau does not support 2 monitors.
Find the akmod logs for the nvidia build and see if there is a clue about what went
wrong.
I do not see any such logs in the gnome "logview" tool (which is where I
see the boot and dnf logs). Where are the akmod logs?
[... snip ...]
Bill.
5:58 p.m.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 4:45 PM home user <mattisonw(a)comcast.net> wrote:
I do not see any such logs in the gnome "logview" tool
(which is where I
see the boot and dnf logs). Where are the akmod logs?
/var/cache/akmods/nvidia
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
6:57 p.m.
On 11/3/22 4:58 PM, Jerry James wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 4:45 PM home user
<mattisonw(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> I do not see any such logs in the gnome "logview" tool (which is where I
> see the boot and dnf logs). Where are the akmod logs?
/var/cache/akmods/nvidia
Nothing there...
-----
bash.3[nvidia]: ls -a
. ..
bash.4[nvidia]: pwd
/var/cache/akmods/nvidia
bash.5[nvidia]:
-----
Bill.
5:25 p.m.
home user composed on 2022-11-03 15:51 (UTC-0600):
...
This leads me to think that the problem is not with the monitors.
The
display in the one monitor looks a little fuzzy and stretched out
horizontally. I also notice at the end of the boot log the following lines:
...
What is the problem?
More important, how do I fix it?
Were you previously using a 5.19 kernel and the new kernel is a 6.0? The problem
is NVidia's proprietary driver isn't working, and the fallback driver is too
crude
to support more than one display or more than 1024x768 mode or possibly 1280x1024,
either of which stretch screen objects horizontally, and usually provide a much
lower screen resolution than the displays' optimums. Try reinstalling the NVidia
drivers to fix it.
--
Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion,
based on faith, not based on science.
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata
5:59 p.m.
On 11/3/22 4:25 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
home user composed on 2022-11-03 15:51 (UTC-0600):
...
Were you previously using a 5.19 kernel and the new kernel is a 6.0? The problem
is NVidia's proprietary driver isn't working, and the fallback driver is too
crude
to support more than one display or more than 1024x768 mode or possibly 1280x1024,
either of which stretch screen objects horizontally, and usually provide a much
lower screen resolution than the displays' optimums. Try reinstalling the NVidia
drivers to fix it.
How do I determine which kernel I'm using now?
Before this afternoon's patching, I was using whichever kernel would
have been patched/installed by the previous weekly patch ("dnf upgrade",
run on October 27). I was not using the nVidia proprietary driver, but
the free one (kmod?).
When doing weekly patches, usually after the "dnf upgrade" completes, a
CPU-intensive compile "akmod"? runs for a few minutes. I see that in
"kSysGuard". This afternoon, I saw no such process in kSysGuard" after
the "dnf upgrade" completed.
Bill.
6:56 p.m.
On 11/3/22 15:59, home user wrote:
On 11/3/22 4:25 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> home user composed on 2022-11-03 15:51 (UTC-0600):
> ...
>
> Were you previously using a 5.19 kernel and the new kernel is a 6.0?
> The problem
> is NVidia's proprietary driver isn't working, and the fallback driver
> is too crude
> to support more than one display or more than 1024x768 mode or
> possibly 1280x1024,
> either of which stretch screen objects horizontally, and usually
> provide a much
> lower screen resolution than the displays' optimums. Try reinstalling
> the NVidia
> drivers to fix it.
How do I determine which kernel I'm using now?
uname -a
Before this afternoon's patching, I was using whichever kernel
would
have been patched/installed by the previous weekly patch ("dnf upgrade",
run on October 27). I was not using the nVidia proprietary driver, but
the free one (kmod?).
That is merely the result of compiling the proprietary driver. It's not
a free one.
When doing weekly patches, usually after the "dnf upgrade"
completes, a
CPU-intensive compile "akmod"? runs for a few minutes. I see that in
"kSysGuard". This afternoon, I saw no such process in kSysGuard" after
the "dnf upgrade" completed.
akmod is the process that compiles the source into the kmod package that
you see installed. You can try running the akmod process manually to
see what's going wrong, but others have already said the driver version
you have is not compatible with the latest kernel and needs updating.
6:11 p.m.
On 03/11/2022 21:51, home user wrote:
(f36)
Good afternoon,
A short while ago, I did my weekly patches (dnf upgrade), and then
re-booted. Just before that, the workstation display (dual monitor) was
fine. After the reboot, only one display works. If I switch the monitor
cables, I still get a one-monitor display, but on the other monitor.
This leads me to think that the problem is not with the monitors. The
display in the one monitor looks a little fuzzy and stretched out
horizontally. I also notice at the end of the boot log the following
lines:
-----
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m] (2 of 3) Job plymouth-quit-wait.ser…tart
running (1min 17s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m*[0m] (2 of 3) Job
plymouth-quit-wait.ser…tart running (1min 17s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m* [0m] (3 of 3) Job
akmods.service/start running (1min 18s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m* [0m] (3 of 3) Job
akmods.service/start running (1min 18s / no limit)
M
[K[[0;32m OK [0m] Finished [0;1;39makmods.service[0…all new kmods
from akmod packages.
[K Starting [0;1;39mnvidia-fallback.s… nouveau as nvidia did
not load...
[[0;32m OK [0m] Finished [0;1;39mnvidia-fallback.s…to nouveau as
nvidia did not load.
Starting [0;1;39mgdm.service[0m - GNOME Display Manager...
[[0;32m OK [0m] Started [0;1;39mgdm.service[0m - GNOME Display
Manager.
-----
(first and last lines are for context only)
I can't memorize fast enough, but I did notice during the last boot
lines very much like (or identical to?) the lines above that mentioned
"nvidia".
What is the problem?
More important, how do I fix it?
thanks,
Bill.
Your post doesn't show which versions of kernel and nvidia driver you
were running before the problem, but others have had difficulty with the
kernel 6 and the rpmfusion 390xx and 470xx drivers.
There are new versions of both of these in the rpmfusion nonfree updates
testing repo. The 470xx testing version works for me.
John P
8:02 p.m.
On 11/3/22 3:51 PM, home user wrote:
(f36)
...
A few have asked about kernel and driver versions. I've been trying to
grope through logs to get answers. The logs are being split in strange
ways, ways not matching the dates on which the dnf commands were run,
making this both difficult and tedious. But here's what I find (some
extra lines included for context)...
==========
(dnf.log)
2022-11-03T12:57:56-0600 DEBUG --> Starting dependency resolution
2022-11-03T12:57:57-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel.x86_64 6.0.5-200.fc36
will be installed
2022-11-03T12:57:58-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel-core.x86_64
6.0.5-200.fc36 will be installed
2022-11-03T12:57:58-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel-devel.x86_64
6.0.5-200.fc36 will be installed
2022-11-03T12:57:58-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel-modules.x86_64
6.0.5-200.fc36 will be installed
2022-11-03T12:57:59-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel-devel-matched.x86_64
5.19.16-200.fc36 will be upgraded
2022-11-03T12:57:59-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel-devel-matched.x86_64
6.0.5-200.fc36 will be an upgrade
2022-11-03T12:57:59-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel-headers.x86_64
5.19.4-200.fc36 will be upgraded
2022-11-03T12:57:59-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel-headers.x86_64
6.0.5-200.fc36 will be an upgrade
2022-11-03T12:57:59-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel-tools.x86_64
5.19.4-200.fc36 will be upgraded
2022-11-03T12:57:59-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel-tools.x86_64
6.0.5-200.fc36 will be an upgrade
2022-11-03T12:57:59-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel-tools-libs.x86_64
5.19.4-200.fc36 will be upgraded
2022-11-03T12:57:59-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel-tools-libs.x86_64
6.0.5-200.fc36 will be an upgrade
2022-11-03T12:58:00-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel.x86_64
5.19.14-100.fc35 will be erased
2022-11-03T12:58:00-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel-core.x86_64
5.19.14-100.fc35 will be erased
2022-11-03T12:58:00-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel-devel.x86_64
5.19.14-100.fc35 will be erased
2022-11-03T12:58:00-0600 DEBUG ---> Package kernel-modules.x86_64
5.19.14-100.fc35 will be erased
2022-11-03T12:58:00-0600 DEBUG ---> Package
kmod-nvidia-470xx-5.19.14-100.fc35.x86_64.x86_64 3:470.141.03-1.fc35
will be erased
2022-11-03T12:58:00-0600 DEBUG --> Finished dependency resolution
[1m[32mkernel (B[m x86_64
6.0.5-200.fc36 updates
113 k
[1m[32mkernel-core (B[m
x86_64 6.0.5-200.fc36 updates
52 M
[1m[32mkernel-devel (B[m
x86_64 6.0.5-200.fc36 updates
16 M
[1m[32mkernel-modules (B[m
x86_64 6.0.5-200.fc36 updates
62 M
[1m[32mkernel-devel-matched (B[m x86_64
6.0.5-200.fc36 updates
113 k
[1m[32mkernel-headers (B[m
x86_64 6.0.5-200.fc36 updates
1.3 M
[1m[32mkernel-tools (B[m
x86_64 6.0.5-200.fc36 updates
259 k
[1m[32mkernel-tools-libs (B[m
x86_64 6.0.5-200.fc36 updates
21 k
Removing:
[31mkernel (B[m x86_64
5.19.14-100.fc35 @updates
0
[31mkernel-core (B[m x86_64
5.19.14-100.fc35 @updates
92 M
[31mkernel-devel (B[m x86_64
5.19.14-100.fc35 @updates
64 M
[31mkernel-modules (B[m x86_64
5.19.14-100.fc35 @updates
58 M
Removing dependent packages:
[31mkmod-nvidia-470xx-5.19.14-100.fc35.x86_64 (B[m x86_64
3:470.141.03-1.fc35 @@commandline
44 M
2022-11-03T13:03:03-0600 DEBUG Upgraded:
kernel-devel-matched-6.0.5-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-11-03T13:03:03-0600 DEBUG Upgraded:
kernel-headers-6.0.5-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-11-03T13:03:03-0600 DEBUG Upgraded: kernel-tools-6.0.5-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-11-03T13:03:03-0600 DEBUG Upgraded:
kernel-tools-libs-6.0.5-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-11-03T13:03:03-0600 DEBUG Installed: kernel-6.0.5-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-11-03T13:03:03-0600 DEBUG Installed: kernel-core-6.0.5-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-11-03T13:03:03-0600 DEBUG Installed: kernel-devel-6.0.5-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-11-03T13:03:03-0600 DEBUG Installed:
kernel-modules-6.0.5-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-11-03T13:03:03-0600 DEBUG Removed: kernel-5.19.14-100.fc35.x86_64
2022-11-03T13:03:03-0600 DEBUG Removed: kernel-core-5.19.14-100.fc35.x86_64
2022-11-03T13:03:03-0600 DEBUG Removed: kernel-devel-5.19.14-100.fc35.x86_64
2022-11-03T13:03:03-0600 DEBUG Removed:
kernel-modules-5.19.14-100.fc35.x86_64
2022-11-03T13:03:03-0600 DEBUG Removed:
kmod-nvidia-470xx-5.19.14-100.fc35.x86_64-3:470.141.03-1.fc35.x86_64
(I'll skip the entries from the clean-up part of the log)
==========
(dnf.log.1)
Installing:
kernel x86_64 5.19.16-200.fc36
updates 264 k
kernel-core x86_64 5.19.16-200.fc36
updates 49 M
kernel-devel x86_64 5.19.16-200.fc36
updates 16 M
kernel-modules x86_64 5.19.16-200.fc36
updates
58 M
akmod-nvidia-470xx x86_64 3:470.141.03-1.fc36
rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 26 k
akmods noarch 0.5.7-8.fc36
updates 28 k
kmod x86_64 29-7.fc36
fedora 118 k
kmod-libs x86_64 29-7.fc36
fedora 68 k
kmodtool noarch 1.1-3.fc36
fedora 17 k
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau x86_64 1:1.0.17-3.fc36
fedora 98 k
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx x86_64
3:470.141.03-1.fc36 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 19 M
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-kmodsrc x86_64
3:470.141.03-1.fc36 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 24 M
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-libs i686
3:470.141.03-1.fc36 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 23 M
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-libs x86_64
3:470.141.03-1.fc36 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 143 M
kernel-headers x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36
updates 1.3 M
kernel-srpm-macros noarch 1.0-14.fc36
fedora 9.1 k
kernel-tools x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36
updates 257 k
kernel-tools-libs x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36
updates 21 k
kernel-devel-matched x86_64 5.19.16-200.fc36
updates 264 k
Removing:
kernel x86_64 5.19.13-100.fc35
@updates 0
kernel-core x86_64 5.19.13-100.fc35
@updates 92 M
kernel-devel x86_64 5.19.13-100.fc35
@updates 64 M
kernel-modules x86_64 5.19.13-100.fc35
@updates 58 M
Removing dependent packages:
kmod-nvidia-470xx-5.19.13-100.fc35.x86_64 x86_64
3:470.141.03-1.fc35 @@commandline 44 M
2022-10-20T11:21:12-0600 DDEBUG Command: dnf -y install --disablerepo=*
/tmp/akmods.XvVRYyLI/results/kmod-nvidia-470xx-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64-470.141.03-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
2
2022-10-20T11:21:12-0600 DDEBUG Extra commands: ['-y', 'install',
'--disablerepo=*',
'/tmp/akmods.XvVRYyLI/results/kmod-nvidia-470xx-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64-470.141.03-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm']
2022-10-20T11:21:21-0600 DEBUG --> Starting dependency resolution
2022-10-20T11:21:21-0600 DEBUG ---> Package
kmod-nvidia-470xx-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64.x86_64 3:470.141.03-1.fc36
will be installed
2022-10-20T11:21:21-0600 DEBUG --> Finished dependency resolution
2022-10-20T11:21:21-0600 INFO Dependencies resolved.
2022-10-20T11:21:21-0600 INFO
============================================================================================
Package Arch Version
Repository Size
============================================================================================
Installing:
kmod-nvidia-470xx-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64 x86_64
3:470.141.03-1.fc36 @commandline 24 M
Transaction Summary
============================================================================================
Install 1 Package
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Upgraded:
akmod-nvidia-470xx-3:470.141.03-1.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Upgraded: akmods-0.5.7-8.fc36.noarch
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Upgraded: kmod-29-7.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Upgraded: kmod-libs-29-7.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Upgraded: kmodtool-1.1-3.fc36.noarch
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Upgraded:
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1:1.0.17-3.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Upgraded:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-3:470.141.03-1.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Upgraded:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-kmodsrc-3:470.141.03-1.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Upgraded:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-libs-3:470.141.03-1.fc36.i686
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Upgraded:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-libs-3:470.141.03-1.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Upgraded:
kernel-headers-5.19.4-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Upgraded:
kernel-srpm-macros-1.0-14.fc36.noarch
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Upgraded: kernel-tools-5.19.4-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Upgraded:
kernel-tools-libs-5.19.4-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Installed: kernel-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Installed:
kernel-core-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Installed:
kernel-devel-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Installed:
kernel-devel-matched-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Installed:
kernel-modules-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Removed: kernel-5.19.13-100.fc35.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Removed: kernel-core-5.19.13-100.fc35.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Removed: kernel-devel-5.19.13-100.fc35.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Removed:
kernel-modules-5.19.13-100.fc35.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:25-0600 DEBUG Removed:
kmod-nvidia-470xx-5.19.13-100.fc35.x86_64-3:470.141.03-1.fc35.x86_64
2022-10-20T11:28:26-0600 INFO Complete!
(I'll skip the entries from the clean-up part of the log)
==========
Using Samuel's suggestion...
-----
bash.6[~]: uname -a
Linux coyote 6.0.5-200.fc36.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Oct 26
15:55:21 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
bash.7[~]:
-----
It looks like today's patches upgraded the kernel
from 5.19.16-200.fc36
to 6.0.5-200.fc36.
It looks like the 10/27 patches did not do anything to the kernel or the
graphics driver.
I see matches to "akmod", "kmod", and "nvidia". I do not
understand the
graphics drivers well enough to understand what really was done.
What specifically do I need to install?
"dnf install [what?]" and re-boot.
Is there anything else I need to do?
thanks,
Bill.
8:20 p.m.
home user composed on 2022-11-03 19:02 (UTC-0600):
What specifically do I need to install?
"dnf install [what?]" and re-boot.
Is there anything else I need to do?
It still boots the 5.19 kernel OK, right?
1-Backup the initrd for 5.19.
2-Boot only the 5.19 kernel until such time as updated NVidia 470 drivers reach
rpmfusion-nonfree-updates so you can upgrade them. Alternatively, switch to those
currently in rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing.
3-(optional but desirable) find a way to paste only plain text into your email,
leaving out the confusing ANSI strings such as "[K[
[0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m]".
--
Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion,
based on faith, not based on science.
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata
9:29 p.m.
On 11/3/22 7:20 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
home user composed on 2022-11-03 19:02 (UTC-0600):
...
1-Backup the initrd for 5.19.
According to the man page for initrd, it should be in "/dev" and/or
"/".
But using "ls -a", I don't see initrd in either place. The
"whereis"
command only find a compressed man page. Where is "initrd"?
Bill.
9:48 p.m.
home user composed on 2022-11-03 20:29 (UTC-0600):
Felix Miata wrote:
> home user composed on 2022-11-03 19:02 (UTC-0600):
...
> 1-Backup the initrd for 5.19.
According to the man page for initrd, it should be in
"/dev" and/or "/".
But using "ls -a", I don't see initrd in either place. The
"whereis"
command only find a compressed man page. Where is "initrd"?
/boot/initramfs-5.19.17-200.fc36.x86_64.img
Initrd is the traditional term for initial RAM disk (initrd), which after many
moons use had the term initial RAM filesystem (initramfs) ascribed to the file
serving the same purpose and basic structure. It was never a literal disk, just a
filesystem, like floppies, HDD partitions and logical volumes support. On most
installations, either lsinitrd or lsinitramfs will list either's contents.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_ramdisk
--
Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion,
based on faith, not based on science.
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata
10:42 p.m.
On 11/3/22 8:48 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
home user composed on 2022-11-03 20:29 (UTC-0600):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> home user composed on 2022-11-03 19:02 (UTC-0600):
> ...
>> 1-Backup the initrd for 5.19.
> According to the man page for initrd, it should be in "/dev" and/or
"/".
> But using "ls -a", I don't see initrd in either place. The
"whereis"
> command only find a compressed man page. Where is "initrd"?
/boot/initramfs-5.19.17-200.fc36.x86_64.img
...
What I have is
-rw-------. 1 root root 33824169 Oct 20 09:47
initramfs-5.19.16-100.fc35.x86_64.img
-rw-------. 1 root root 35051075 Oct 20 11:19
initramfs-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64.img
-rw-------. 1 root root 35452743 Nov 3 13:02
initramfs-6.0.5-200.fc36.x86_64.img
I'm a little puzzled that there are 2 initrd files for that date. It
might be important that Oct. 20 is the day I first did a weekly "dnf
upgrade", and then upgraded from f35 to f36. Is the 11:19 the one I
should back up, or should I back up both Oct. 20 files?
I'm now shutting down for the night. I'll try booting up with the 5.19
kernel (as you suggested) in the morning when I power up the workstation.
thanks,
Bill.
11:05 p.m.
home user composed on 2022-11-03 21:42 (UTC-0600):
What I have is
-rw-------. 1 root root 33824169 Oct 20 09:47
initramfs-5.19.16-100.fc35.x86_64.img
-rw-------. 1 root root 35051075 Oct 20 11:19
initramfs-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64.img
-rw-------. 1 root root 35452743 Nov 3 13:02
initramfs-6.0.5-200.fc36.x86_64.img
I'm a little puzzled that there are 2 initrd files for that date.
It
might be important that Oct. 20 is the day I first did a weekly "dnf
upgrade", and then upgraded from f35 to f36. Is the 11:19 the one I
should back up, or should I back up both Oct. 20 files?
initramfs-5.19.16-100.fc35.x86_64.img was either installed or updated when you did
your customary periodic updates to F35. initramfs-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64.img was
created later when you did your system-upgrade to F36. As long as 200.fc36 belongs
to a *working* kernel, it's the important one to have backed up. It couldn't hurt
to backup both though.
--
Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion,
based on faith, not based on science.
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata
1:27 p.m.
On 11/3/22 10:05 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
home user composed on 2022-11-03 21:42 (UTC-0600):
> ...
initramfs-5.19.16-100.fc35.x86_64.img was either installed or updated when you did
your customary periodic updates to F35. initramfs-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64.img was
created later when you did your system-upgrade to F36. As long as 200.fc36 belongs
to a *working* kernel, it's the important one to have backed up. It couldn't
hurt
to backup both though.
My workstation does properly boot the 5.19.16-200.
back-ups done:
----------
bash.2[~]: su -
Password:
-bash.1[~]: cd /boot
-bash.2[boot]: ls initramfs-*
initramfs-0-rescue-70857e3fb05849139515e66a3fdc6b38.img
initramfs-3.10.7-200.fc19.x86_64.img
initramfs-5.19.16-100.fc35.x86_64.img
initramfs-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64.img
initramfs-6.0.5-200.fc36.x86_64.img
initramfs-fedup.img
-bash.3[boot]: cd
-bash.4[~]: mkdir initrd_backups
-bash.5[~]: cd initrd_backups/
-bash.6[initrd_backups]: ls -a
. ..
-bash.7[initrd_backups]: cp -ip /boot/initramfs-5* .
-bash.8[initrd_backups]: ls -a
. initramfs-5.19.16-100.fc35.x86_64.img
.. initramfs-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64.img
-bash.9[initrd_backups]: ls -la
total 67276
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Nov 4 12:16 .
dr-xr-x---. 43 root root 4096 Nov 4 12:15 ..
-rw-------. 1 root root 33824169 Oct 20 09:47
initramfs-5.19.16-100.fc35.x86_64.img
-rw-------. 1 root root 35051075 Oct 20 11:19
initramfs-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64.img
-bash.10[initrd_backups]:
----------
Am I correct in assuming that I should not do weekly patches until the
proper updated NVidia 470 drivers reach rpmfusion-nonfree-updates?
How will I know when the proper updated NVidia 470 drivers reach
rpmfusion-nonfree-updates?
thanks,
Bill.
1:30 p.m.
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 12:27:21 -0600
home user <mattisonw(a)comcast.net> wrote:
Am I correct in assuming that I should not do weekly patches until
the proper updated NVidia 470 drivers reach rpmfusion-nonfree-updates?
Since the next update of the nvidia 470 drivers will probably be to
fix this issue, it should be okay to do so. If you want to avoid
updates until certain, you could use
dnf -x [nvidia driver]
so it doesn't update.
How will I know when the proper updated NVidia 470 drivers reach
rpmfusion-nonfree-updates?
You could go to the website and look at the versions in their
repositories, or subscribe to their mailing list at rpmfusion.org. They
send out emails with pending updates.
11:57 p.m.
On 11/5/22 14:30, stan via users wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 12:27:21 -0600
home user <mattisonw(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> Am I correct in assuming that I should not do weekly patches until
> the proper updated NVidia 470 drivers reach rpmfusion-nonfree-updates?
Since the next update of the nvidia 470 drivers will probably be to
fix this issue, it should be okay to do so. If you want to avoid
updates until certain, you could use
dnf -x [nvidia driver]
so it doesn't update.
> How will I know when the proper updated NVidia 470 drivers reach
> rpmfusion-nonfree-updates?
You could go to the website and look at the versions in their
repositories, or subscribe to their mailing list at rpmfusion.org. They
send out emails with pending updates.
See a new 470 driver with dnf update. No 390
for legacy nvidia card as yet.
3:32 a.m.
On 06/11/2022 04:57, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
On 11/5/22 14:30, stan via users wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 12:27:21 -0600
> home user <mattisonw(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>> Am I correct in assuming that I should not do weekly patches until
>> the proper updated NVidia 470 drivers reach rpmfusion-nonfree-updates?
> Since the next update of the nvidia 470 drivers will probably be to
> fix this issue, it should be okay to do so. If you want to avoid
> updates until certain, you could use
> dnf -x [nvidia driver]
> so it doesn't update.
>
>> How will I know when the proper updated NVidia 470 drivers reach
>> rpmfusion-nonfree-updates?
> You could go to the website and look at the versions in their
> repositories, or subscribe to their mailing list at rpmfusion.org. They
> send out emails with pending updates.
See a new 470 driver with dnf update. No 390 for legacy nvidia card as yet.
390xx went into the testing repo on 3 Nov
10:57 a.m.
On 11/3/22 3:51 PM, home user wrote:
This had to be tabled for a while, until the RPM Fusion fixed nvidia
driver was released. Your memory of this can be refreshed using the
fedora HYPERKITTY archive of the thread here:
"https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/X6QCDYEIFO7DKZE5ENCHBCW776TC26WF/".
First, I believe it would be wise to get confirmation that what I see in
the RPM Fusion web site page
"https://mirror.fcix.net/rpmfusion/nonfree/fedora/updates/36/x86_64/repoview/index.html"...
---------------
Latest packages:
2022-11-29: nvidia-settings-470xx-470.161.03-1.fc36
2022-11-29: akmod-nvidia-470xx-470.161.03-1.fc36
2022-11-29: kmod-nvidia-470xx-470.161.03-1.fc36
2022-11-29: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-470.161.03-1.fc36
2022-11-29: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-cuda-470.161.03-1.fc36
2022-11-29: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-cuda-libs-470.161.03-1.fc36
2022-11-29: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-devel-470.161.03-1.fc36
2022-11-29: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-kmodsrc-470.161.03-1.fc36
2022-11-29: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-libs-470.161.03-1.fc36
2022-11-29: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-470xx-power-470.161.03-1.fc36
...............
is what I need. Is this what I need?
thanks,
Bill.
(f36)
Good afternoon,
A short while ago, I did my weekly patches (dnf upgrade), and then
re-booted. Just before that, the workstation display (dual monitor) was
fine. After the reboot, only one display works. If I switch the monitor
cables, I still get a one-monitor display, but on the other monitor.
This leads me to think that the problem is not with the monitors. The
display in the one monitor looks a little fuzzy and stretched out
horizontally. I also notice at the end of the boot log the following
lines:
-----
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m] (2 of 3) Job plymouth-quit-wait.ser…tart
running (1min 17s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m*[0m] (2 of 3) Job
plymouth-quit-wait.ser…tart running (1min 17s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m* [0m] (3 of 3) Job
akmods.service/start running (1min 18s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m* [0m] (3 of 3) Job
akmods.service/start running (1min 18s / no limit)
M
[K[[0;32m OK [0m] Finished [0;1;39makmods.service[0…all new kmods
from akmod packages.
[K Starting [0;1;39mnvidia-fallback.s… nouveau as nvidia did
not load...
[[0;32m OK [0m] Finished [0;1;39mnvidia-fallback.s…to nouveau as
nvidia did not load.
Starting [0;1;39mgdm.service[0m - GNOME Display Manager...
[[0;32m OK [0m] Started [0;1;39mgdm.service[0m - GNOME Display
Manager.
-----
(first and last lines are for context only)
I can't memorize fast enough, but I did notice during the last boot
lines very much like (or identical to?) the lines above that mentioned
"nvidia".
What is the problem?
More important, how do I fix it?
thanks,
Bill.
1:12 p.m.
New subject: monitor/display problem. [SOLVED]
On 11/3/22 3:51 PM, home user wrote:
This problem was solved by the "dnf upgrade" that I did on Dec. 14.
Details can be viewed in the follow-up thread "need perm. fix for
monitor/display problem.", launched on Dec. 14.
My thanks to everyone who tried to help.
(f36)
Good afternoon,
A short while ago, I did my weekly patches (dnf upgrade), and then
re-booted. Just before that, the workstation display (dual monitor) was
fine. After the reboot, only one display works. If I switch the monitor
cables, I still get a one-monitor display, but on the other monitor.
This leads me to think that the problem is not with the monitors. The
display in the one monitor looks a little fuzzy and stretched out
horizontally. I also notice at the end of the boot log the following
lines:
-----
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m] (2 of 3) Job plymouth-quit-wait.ser…tart
running (1min 17s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m*[0m] (2 of 3) Job
plymouth-quit-wait.ser…tart running (1min 17s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m* [0m] (3 of 3) Job
akmods.service/start running (1min 18s / no limit)
M
[K[ [0;31m*[0;1;31m*[0m[0;31m* [0m] (3 of 3) Job
akmods.service/start running (1min 18s / no limit)
M
[K[[0;32m OK [0m] Finished [0;1;39makmods.service[0…all new kmods
from akmod packages.
[K Starting [0;1;39mnvidia-fallback.s… nouveau as nvidia did
not load...
[[0;32m OK [0m] Finished [0;1;39mnvidia-fallback.s…to nouveau as
nvidia did not load.
Starting [0;1;39mgdm.service[0m - GNOME Display Manager...
[[0;32m OK [0m] Started [0;1;39mgdm.service[0m - GNOME Display
Manager.
-----
(first and last lines are for context only)
I can't memorize fast enough, but I did notice during the last boot
lines very much like (or identical to?) the lines above that mentioned
"nvidia".
What is the problem?
More important, how do I fix it?
thanks,
Bill.
488
days inactive
541
days old
22 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
Barry -
Felix Miata -
home user -
Jerry James -
Joe Zeff -
John Pilkington -
Robert McBroom -
Samuel Sieb -
stan