tibbs(a)math.uh.edu (Jason L Tibbitts III) writes:
ES> IMO, drafts should reflect the state of current discussion
and
ES> should be updated. It does not help when discussion on maillist is
ES> ignored and some obsolete document will be ratified.
If you're trying to tell me that I shouldn't have tried then I'll be
happy to stop.
No; I just think that the proposer of a draft shall maintain and update
it.
Wrong/outdated information is much more worse than missing one.
Enrico