On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 6:13 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, I've just realized that %dist is defined to:
%{?distprefix}.fc30%{?with_bootstrap:~bootstrap}
That effectively means that using %bcond_without bootstrap, the dist is changed
to .fc31~bootstrap.
Is this something that we actually want? E.g. I was quite surprised by the behavior.
Reading
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/818
gives me an impression that the packaging committee didn't really approve nor
forbid this, so I'm looking for recommendation.
When I bootstrap, should I manually bump the release number or let this magic
happen?
Let the magic happen. Embrace it, and it will help you. 😁
Also, how do I opt-out from this behavior (other than renaming my conditional)?
I don't think you can unless you rename your conditional. This part
was kinda added for Go things by Nicolas Mailhot. 🤷♂️
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!