Axel Thimm wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 08:18:45AM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway
wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 00:20 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
>> I personally would suggest a namespace that is tex
distribution neutral.
>> The TDS is pretty much what all modern open source tex implementations
>> follow and are going to follow, so it makes sense (to me anyway) to use
>> a neutral namespace, like maybe texmf or something.
>> thoughts?
> Either texmf- or just tex- seem ok to me.
I'd drop the namespace on the binaries and have texmf- on the
texmf
tree components. That's closest to upstream conventions and "upstream
distribution" neutral.
+1
-- Rex