Anthony Green wrote:
I think that if a package
reviewer doesn't know what a REPL is, then they aren't qualified to
review a Common Lisp implementation package (although Lisp libraries
should be easily reviewable without any Lisp domain knowledge).
Wow, really? I guess that in that case all I can do is wish you luck in
getting any packages reviewed at all. Well, that and that I'm inclined
to vote against guidelines which don't explain things sufficiently so
that the available reviewer pool is capable of understanding them.
- J<