Is my hard drive ok ?
by Franck Y
Fellows,
Is My hard drive ok ?
I did a long test and every thing was ok !
But i see the pre-fail
Is my hard drive ok or you think i have to change it
Thanks
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE
UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000b 200 200 051 Pre-fail
Always - 0
3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0007 128 125 021 Pre-fail
Always - 6133
4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 040 Old_age
Always - 74
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail
Always - 0
7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000b 200 200 051 Pre-fail
Always - 0
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 098 098 000 Old_age
Always - 1564
10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 253 051 Pre-fail
Always - 0
11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 253 051 Pre-fail
Always - 0
12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age
Always - 73
194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 101 091 000 Old_age
Always - 49
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
Always - 0
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 200 200 000 Old_age
Always - 0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0012 200 200 000 Old_age
Always - 0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x000a 200 253 000 Old_age
Always - 317
200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0009 200 200 051 Pre-fail
Offline - 0
--
Franck
18 years, 5 months
RE: upgraded from fc3 -> fc4 now, there is no internet?
by Mike McGrath
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Kahn Seidl
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 8:45 AM
> To: fedora-list(a)redhat.com
> Subject: Re: upgraded from fc3 -> fc4 now, there is no internet?
>
> I tried it with iptables turned on and off.
>
> But, I havent check netstat yet. I will do that when I get to work.
>
> Thanks a lot for your help, I will update you later.
>
> Martin
>
>
> >From: Jeff Vian <jvian10(a)charter.net>
> >Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list(a)redhat.com>
> >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list(a)redhat.com>
> >Subject: Re: upgraded from fc3 -> fc4 now, there is no internet?
> >Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:29:32 -0600
> >
> >On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 00:12 +0000, Kahn Seidl wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: James Wilkinson <fedora(a)westexe.demon.co.uk>
> > > >Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> > > ><fedora-list(a)redhat.com>
> > > >To: fedora-list(a)redhat.com
> > > >Subject: Re: upgraded from fc3 -> fc4 now, there is no internet?
> > > >Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 07:51:40 +0000
> > > >
> > > >Either Martin or Kahn Seidl wrote:
> > > > > eth0 comes up fine, picks up the ip address and is configured
> >properly.
> > > > >
> > > > > But, I get no access to the internet?
> > > > >
> > > > > What should i check ?
> > > >
> > > >/sbin/route
> > > >Check you have a default route
> > >
> > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> > >
> > > I am able to ping the router. It picks up an ip address fine
> > >
> > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> > > >Check that you can ping the gateway on the default route.
> > > >(If not, try re-setting up eth0 with system-config-network).
> > > >
> > > >ping 64.233.187.99
> > > >ping 72.14.207.99
> > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> > >
> > > On this, it gives me "connect: Network is unreachable"
> > > When I traceroute the router it says "socket: Permission denied"
> > > When I traceroute google or anybody else, I get the network is
> >unreachable
> > > my other laptop is easily on the same network, and i have had this
> >laptop
> > > working
> > > on this network. Just since I did an upgrade on fc3 -> fc4.
> > >
> > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> > > >ping 212.58.224.83
> >
> >1. Is the firewall active and blocking you? FC4 tries to
> enable it by
> >default. You can try disabling it to test.
> >
> >2. Did you get a default gateway set and is your nameserver
> configured?
> >The nameserver won't affect pings to an IP address but it
> affects use
> >of names. The gateway not properly set will screw it all up.
> >"netstat -r", and the contents of /etc/resolv.conf will tell
> for both
> >of those.
> >
What output do you get from the following command?
time route
-Mike
18 years, 5 months
Logwatch problem
by Franck Y
Fellows,
I have a problem witch logwatch in fact between logwatch and sendmail.
I d like to kno to whom every email had been sent. In first ! And i
want to see what is the subject and the body of the message !
How can i do this ?
I use detail level 10 for sendmail.conf
Here is my logwatch log regarding sendmail
I m worried about this
Cipher: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA Bits: 256/256: 2 Time(s)
Thank you
Franck
Using Detail Level = 10 from conf/services/sendmail.conf
See file conf/services/sendmail.conf on how to customize output.
STATISTICS:
-----------
Bytes Transferred: 11633
Messages Processed: 4
Addressed Recipients: 4
Message recipients per delivery agent:
Name # Rcpts
relay 2
---------------------
TOTAL: 2
in addition to 2 relay
submission(s) from MSP
Message Size Distribution:
Range # Msgs KBytes
0 - 10k 4 11
----------------------------------
TOTAL 4 11
Avg. Size 2
STARTTLS used the following encryption mechanisms
Cipher: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA Bits: 256/256: 2 Time(s)
SMTP SESSION, MESSAGE, OR RECIPIENT ERRORS
------------------------------------------
... no SMTP Session, Message, or Recipient Errors found.
---------------------- sendmail End -------------------------
--
Franck
18 years, 5 months
SSh, Apache implementation
by Franck Y
Fellows members,
I 'll try to explain my problem clearly.
I have two computer.
The first one is called : titanic
The second one: databse
Database has some files/folders who are located in /home/documents.
Apache is not installed one this one but Samba is and it's working properly.
Titanic as apache installed and running.
What i want is when one one my client will connect to titanic it's
show the folder /home/documents in databse . And the client will be
able to browse the folder and dowload the file if he want to. But i
don't want apache runnig on atabse due to security reason...
Do you have any idea how i can implement this thing ?
Thank you
--
Franck
18 years, 5 months
RE: YAYP - Yet Another Yum Problem
by Styma, Robert E (Robert)
> > On 11/29/05, Christopher A. Williams <chrisw01(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> > > I wouldn't be so hard on Livna. I like Dag and what RPM
> Forge has to
> > > offer as well.
> > >
I have been reading through the http://rpmforge.net web pages and
trying to work out the relationship between the Dag and rpmforge
repositories. Is there overlap between the two?
The list of rpms at http://rpmforge.net/user/packages/rpmforge-release/
which can be used to activate the rpmforge repository under yum and other
update tools references both Dag and Dries, so there must be some connection.
Is there merit in having both the Dag and rpmforge repositories active at
the same time?
If there is a explanation of this which I have not yet stumbled across,
please point me in the right direction.
Bob Styma
18 years, 5 months
LVM and Quota for multiple volumes?
by Lonnie Cumberland
Greetings All,
I have a Fedora install that has the /dev/hda drive mounted into a LVM
volume.
Currently, my system which has 2 physical drives was set up with 1
physical drive /dev/hda and thus has 1 logical volume. We then added the
second drive which is /dev/hdc which we only want to have Quota on this
drive (/dev/hdc2) and make it a separate Logical Volume, bt I do not
know how to do this.
The final setup is to have 2 volumes in the LVM such that 1 (the root
filesystem) does not have Quota and the other drives in the second
volume will have Quota running on them. We can then add more drives to
the second volume as we need more user drive space.
I have read over the LVM How To but it does not seem to talk about
having Quota's on a volume.
Can someone please help to guide me through this process?
Thanks,
Lonnie C.
18 years, 5 months
Where can I find KDE 3.5 for Fedora Core 4?
by Yang Bowei
I have search all the kde-redhat, but nothing except some source rpms.
But, where is the RPMS?
Thanks everyone.
--
Regards,
*******************************************************
-BoweiYang-
*******************************************************
18 years, 5 months
kernel-update freq
by Terry Horsnell
What's the policy on keeping up-to-date kernels on
the repos? It looks to me like the latest kernel
on FC3 and 4 is 2.6.12-1.1381 (dated around 22 June),
and yet kernel.org is at 2.6.14.3 (dated 25 Nov).
I've hit a pile of ieee1394 issues which, according
to the Changelogs on kernel.org may well have been
fixed in the more recent kernels.
Should I build my own, or is a FC3/4 kernel-update imminent?
Cheers,
Terry
18 years, 5 months
