Re: Fedora ARM is so strong
by poma
On 26.02.2014 08:50, Jan Kaluža wrote:
> On 02/26/2014 03:08 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 24.02.2014 23:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 02/25/14 01:02, poma wrote:
>>>> $ file *
>>>> autocorr-en-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin ARM
>>>> autocorr-en-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
>>>> libcmis-0.4.1-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
>>>> i386/x86_64 libcmis-0.4.1-2.fc20
>>>> libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
>>>> i386/x86_64 libreoffice-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
>>>> libreoffice-appdata-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin ARM
>>>> libreoffice-appdata-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone noticed something oddly in this list? :)
>>>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have asked RPM maintainer and the problem is that File uses deprecated
> header section of RPM files to get the data. This section should still
> work, but since nothing except File uses it, it's not tested well and
> does not contain proper data everytime.
>
> I have filled bug [1] against File to add support for currently
> officially supported RPM header. I will try to fix that bug when I get
> some free time and send it upstream. You can just add yourself to the
> bug if you are interested in future progress.
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070060
>
> Regards,
> Jan Kaluza
Thanks.
poma
10 years, 2 months
LibreOffice pancake packaging
by poma
$ file *
autocorr-en-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin ARM
autocorr-en-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libcmis-0.4.1-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libcmis-0.4.1-2.fc20
libreoffice-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-appdata-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin ARM
libreoffice-appdata-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-base-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-base-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-bsh-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-bsh-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-calc-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-calc-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-core-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-core-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-draw-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-draw-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-emailmerge-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-emailmerge-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-filters-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-filters-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-glade-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-glade-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-graphicfilter-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-graphicfilter-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-headless-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-headless-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-impress-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-impress-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-kde-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-kde-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-langpack-en-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-langpack-en-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-librelogo-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-librelogo-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-math-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-math-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-nlpsolver-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-nlpsolver-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-ogltrans-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-ogltrans-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-opensymbol-fonts-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin ARM
libreoffice-opensymbol-fonts-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-pdfimport-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-pdfimport-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-postgresql-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-postgresql-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-pyuno-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-pyuno-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-rhino-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-rhino-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-sdk-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-sdk-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-sdk-doc-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-sdk-doc-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-ure-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-ure-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-wiki-publisher-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-wiki-publisher-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-writer-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-writer-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
libreoffice-xsltfilter-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin
i386/x86_64 libreoffice-xsltfilter-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
Has anyone noticed something oddly in this list? :)
poma
10 years, 2 months
Fedora upgrade recovery procedures?
by Dave Shaw
I have an older Toshiba laptop running FC16. I also have a DVD with an
install .iso for FC17. I booted off the DVD, it noticed the existing
installation and offered to do an upgrade. About 5 minutes into the
upgrade process it had arrived at the point where it was about to
install the ~4000 packages. At that point it produced a message saying
there was insufficient disk space on /usr (short 2MB, this on a 12G
logical volume, with considerable space available on the physical
volume) and the install would exit.
Trying to reboot afterwards produces:
sh: cannot set terminal process group (-1): inappropriate ioctl for device
sh: no job control in this shell
and drops into a dracut shell.
Running the "rescue" operation on the DVD says it can't see any valid
Linux partitions. Nevertheless, there are other OSes on the disk and
booting into them suggests the Fedora LVM is intact (as well as the
Fedora boot partition, etc.), although /usr is *empty*.
So am I out of luck here, or is there some kind of recovery possible?
Maybe a Live-CD to do some amount of file tweaking? Does an upgrade
provide any recovery features at all? Is this the right mailing list
to post this question?
Thanks for any thoughts.
10 years, 2 months
fs encryption after install
by Pal, Laszlo
Hi All,
For the last few days I'm trying to find a way to encrypt at least my
home directory (preferably everything except boot) without re-install
Fedora. Unfortunately google does not help in this case... Someone
suggested to use encrypt-fs but I'm not sure this is the best way to
achieve this
Do you have any quick and preferably painless idea?
Thx
Vlad
10 years, 2 months
dnf and/or yum?
by Erik P. Olsen
Can dnf and yum be used interchangeably? And is there a gui interface to dnf
like yumex?
--
Erik
10 years, 2 months
change repos for nvidia...
by Fred Smith
I've got a 64-bit system using Nvidia drivers that came from rpmfusion.
I'd like to switch to the Nvidia drivers from elrepo instead, and wonder
if there is any particular set of steps to follow (to keep, one hopes,
from hosing one's system).
Thanks!
Fred
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything offered to me as
the result of an unsolicited e-mail message. Nor will I forward chain
letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large numbers
of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online
community.
--Roger Ebert, December, 1996
----------------------------- The Boulder Pledge -----------------------------
10 years, 2 months
libreoffice 4.2.1.1 update failing for dependency?
by Michael D. Setzer II
Was just running the update on Fedora 20, and found that it files with the
core needing libcmis-0.4, but 0.3.1-8 is available even in testing?
Had already installed the 4.2.1.1 on a machine with older Fedora from the
source with no issue, so not sure why fedora version has this dependency?
+----------------------------------------------------------+
Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor
Guam Community College Computer Center
mailto:mikes@kuentos.guam.net
mailto:msetzerii@gmail.com
http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
Guam - Where America's Day Begins
G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer
http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+----------------------------------------------------------+
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned: 19,471
Processing time: 32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)
BOINC@HOME CREDITS
ROSETTA 11691834.229196 | SETI 19838125.942348
ABC 16613838.513356 | EINSTEIN 17711460.699650
10 years, 2 months
Recovering/Restoring Boot Partition
by Don Levey
A short while ago, during a power cut, my desktop machine failed. A
power-up displayed symptoms consistent with a missing /boot partition;
attempting to boot under the rescue CD seemed to confirm this when it
did not mount the /boot partition.
Booting under the F20 LiveUSB key allowed me to manually mount the
partition; however, while I see files listed there some of them do not
appear to be readable.
I have seen the suggestion that all I need to do is to reinstall the
appropriate kernel files in the right place:
* Mount / via LiveUSB
* Mount /boot under / (above)
* "mount -bind" the current /proc directory to the
HD /proc directory
* "chroot" to the / directory mounted (above)
* "yum install" of grub, kernel, and logos
(all via
http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/red-hat-fedora-linux/187043-howto-recove..."
Is that what I'm looking to do, or is this dangerous? Are there
alternate/better suggestions?
-Don
10 years, 2 months
Even more yum breakage; this time with libreoffice
by Dan Irwin
Hi all,
It seems libreoffice depends on libcmis-0.4.so.4()(64bit), yet there is no
libcmis-0.4.so.4()(64bit) in any fedora repo.
I do see libcmis-0.3.1-8.fc20.x86_64, but this is in the os repo, and not
in updates.
I am going to assume this is a widespread problem, and not related to my
machine's broken rpm database.
I am yet to completely fix my system from the dupe packages/rpm scriptlet
problem. And now I have no openoffice until someone pushes libcmis-0.4.
Its been a rough week in fedoraland!
Cheers,
Dan.
10 years, 2 months
Firewalld and fail2ban
by David Mehler
Hello,
I use to use iptables on fc17, now with firewalld in fc20 I'm
migrating to it. I have to say I like it better, there are things I'm
curious if it can do.
For example, if you allow in http does that work for ipv4, ipv6, or both?
Second question, in my previous setup I used fail2ban to block ip
addresses that were brute forcing the system. I'm wondering if
fail2ban and firewalld can work together? Googling showed it was
possible with an action.d file, but the site referenced returned a
page not found.
Thanks.
Dave.
10 years, 2 months
