Re: (fedora) Re: mismatch in hdf packages prevent upgrade from F30->F31
by Jouk Jansen
Ed Greshko wrote on 7-NOV-2019 12:04:26.12
>On 11/7/19 6:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>
>> On an F31 system and it seems like netcdf is the most logical choice.
I removed the netcdf*.i686 packeages and that solved the problem.
>>
>> On my F31, I get
>>
>> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires hdf
[snip]
>Oh, I did have a F30 VM available so for completeness I get...
>[egreshko@f30g ~]$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires hdf
>Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:00 ago on Thu 07 Nov 2019 06:48:27 PM CST.
>hdf-devel-0:4.2.14-2.fc30.i686
>hdf-devel-0:4.2.14-2.fc30.x86_64
Thanks for finding out. A classical "chicken and egg" problem: You need F31
to find out but only have F30!!!
regards
Jouk
Pax, vel iniusta, utilior est quam iustissimum bellum.
(free after Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 b.Chr.-46 b.Chr.)
Epistularum ad Atticum 7.1.4.3)
Touch not the cat bot a glove
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<
Jouk Jansen
joukj(a)hrem.nano.tudelft.nl
Technische Universiteit Delft tttttttttt uu uu ddddddd
Kavli Institute of Nanoscience tttttttttt uu uu dd dd
Nationaal centrum voor HREM tt uu uu dd dd
Lorentzweg 1 tt uu uu dd dd
2628 CJ Delft tt uu uu dd dd
Nederland tt uu uu dd dd
tel. 31-15-2782272 tt uuuuuuu ddddddd
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<
4 years, 5 months
Re: (fedora) Re: mismatch in hdf packages prevent upgrade from F30->F31
by Jouk Jansen
Ed Greshko 7-NOV-2019 10:53:43.94
>On 11/7/19 5:11 PM, Jouk Jansen wrote:
>> When performing an upgrade from F30 to F31 on one of my machines the upgrade
>> process tries to install (yes an install not an upgrade) the packages
>> hdf.x86-64 and hdf.i686. This fails due to a mismatch in these packages of
>> /usr/bin/h4cc and /usr/bin/h4fc.
>>
>> Does anyone has an idea which other package recently got a dependence on hdf
>> and triggers this problem? If I know I may can remove the i686 version from
>> my system.
>I had no issues to upgrade several systems.
>But, what you've said suggests that you may have at least one i686 installed which now needs
>hdf when it didn't before.
That is also what I think, but which package?
>If you do
>rpm -qa | grep i686
>does it return anything?
yes : I estimate 150-200 packages.
No idea which one is the trouble maker.
What should I do remove with trial and error? The most likely candidates for
me are netcdf-4.4.1.1-12.fc30.i686 and netcdf-cxx-4.2-21.fc30.i686
regards
Jouk
Pax, vel iniusta, utilior est quam iustissimum bellum.
(free after Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 b.Chr.-46 b.Chr.)
Epistularum ad Atticum 7.1.4.3)
Touch not the cat bot a glove
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<
Jouk Jansen
joukj(a)hrem.nano.tudelft.nl
Technische Universiteit Delft tttttttttt uu uu ddddddd
Kavli Institute of Nanoscience tttttttttt uu uu dd dd
Nationaal centrum voor HREM tt uu uu dd dd
Lorentzweg 1 tt uu uu dd dd
2628 CJ Delft tt uu uu dd dd
Nederland tt uu uu dd dd
tel. 31-15-2782272 tt uuuuuuu ddddddd
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<
4 years, 5 months
Problem with latest google chrome beta
by Geoffrey Leach
Google Chrome 79.0.3945.16 beta
Fedora 5.2.18-200.fc30.x86_64
% google-chrome
[2301:2301:1104/131821.292582:ERROR:sandbox_linux.cc(372)]
InitializeSandbox() called with multiple threads in process
gpu-process. [2301:2301:1104/131821.982525:ERROR:gl_utils.cc(325)]
[.DisplayCompositor] GL_INVALID_OPERATION: Program not linked.
[2301:2301:1104/131821.982735:ERROR:gl_utils.cc(325)]
[.DisplayCompositor] GL_INVALID_OPERATION: Program object expected. ....
Installed 11/01
Any thoughts?
4 years, 5 months
libunique -
by Bob Goodwin
.
In an attempt to install a Fedora 40 Notecase Pro rpm in °fedora 31 I
find that it requires "libunique-1.0.so" and I was unable to find that
with dnf.
dnf whatprovides libunique gives no matches found.
Where should I look for"libunique-1.0.so" an rpm?
Bob
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
4 years, 5 months
Re: (fedora) Re: How to get Klamav working on a fresh installed F31
by Jouk Jansen
Ed Greshko wrote on 6-NOV-2019 00:23:29.83
>On 11/5/19 9:49 PM, Jouk Jansen wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> On a fresh installed F31 I tried to get Klamav running. However I got the
>> the errors listed below. What is wrong in the configuration? Or am I
>> packages missing?
[snip]
>I do not know the answer to your question.�� Other than to say I found that it does run *if* started
>from a terminal as "root".
>Along those lines, dcopserver seems only able to be started by "root".
>Those "clues" may help you track down the issue.
You are right. I could start it "as root" from a terminal session. In F30 I
did not need to do this. Is this a new "feature" or just a bug?
regards
Jouk
Pax, vel iniusta, utilior est quam iustissimum bellum.
(free after Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 b.Chr.-46 b.Chr.)
Epistularum ad Atticum 7.1.4.3)
Touch not the cat bot a glove
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<
Jouk Jansen
joukj(a)hrem.nano.tudelft.nl
Technische Universiteit Delft tttttttttt uu uu ddddddd
Kavli Institute of Nanoscience tttttttttt uu uu dd dd
Nationaal centrum voor HREM tt uu uu dd dd
Lorentzweg 1 tt uu uu dd dd
2628 CJ Delft tt uu uu dd dd
Nederland tt uu uu dd dd
tel. 31-15-2782272 tt uuuuuuu ddddddd
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<
4 years, 5 months
How to get Klamav working on a fresh installed F31
by Jouk Jansen
Hi All,
On a fresh installed F31 I tried to get Klamav running. However I got the
the errors listed below. What is wrong in the configuration? Or am I
packages missing?
I get:
#) klamav
ICE Connection rejected!
DCOPClient::attachInternal. Attach failed Authentication Rejected, reason : Nond
ICE Connection rejected!
DCOPClient::attachInternal. Attach failed Authentication Rejected, reason : Nond
DCOPServer self-test failed.
kdeinit: DCOPServer could not be started, aborting.
vleegert-jj ) klamav
DCOPClient::attachInternal. Attach failed Authentication Rejected, reason : None
of the authentication protocols specified are supported and host-based authenti
cation failed
ICE Connection rejected!
DCOPClient::attachInternal. Attach failed Authentication Rejected, reason : None
of the authentication protocols specified are supported and host-based authenti
cation failed
DCOPServer self-test failed.
ICE Connection rejected!
kdeinit: DCOPServer could not be started, aborting.
#)
Regards
Jouk
Pax, vel iniusta, utilior est quam iustissimum bellum.
(free after Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 b.Chr.-46 b.Chr.)
Epistularum ad Atticum 7.1.4.3)
Touch not the cat bot a glove
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<
Jouk Jansen
joukj(a)hrem.nano.tudelft.nl
Technische Universiteit Delft tttttttttt uu uu ddddddd
Kavli Institute of Nanoscience tttttttttt uu uu dd dd
Nationaal centrum voor HREM tt uu uu dd dd
Lorentzweg 1 tt uu uu dd dd
2628 CJ Delft tt uu uu dd dd
Nederland tt uu uu dd dd
tel. 31-15-2782272 tt uuuuuuu ddddddd
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<
4 years, 5 months
Network bridge help - fedora 31 broke things!
by Tom Horsley
I have all NetworkManager services masked out.
I have network-scripts installed and network enabled.
I have these files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts:
ifcfg-p6p1 looks like:
NM_CONTROLLED="no"
DHCPV6C="no"
DEVICE="p6p1"
ONBOOT="yes"
PEERDNS="no"
HWADDR="00:0B:0E:0F:00:ED"
BRIDGE=br0
ifcfg-br0 looks like:
NM_CONTROLLED="no"
DHCPV6C="no"
BOOTPROTO="dhcp"
DEVICE="br0"
ONBOOT="yes"
PEERDNS="no"
TYPE=Bridge
On fedora 30, br0 automagically shows up with the same
MAC as p6p1.
On fedora 31, br0 gets the wacky MAC address:
26:b0:0b:12:b4:6c
The corporate DHCP service then thinks I have a different
hardware and gives me the wrong IP address which doesn't
lead to my hostname.
Anyone know what is going on?
4 years, 5 months
Perl 6 can't find subs in modules
by ToddAndMargo
Hi All,
Help! I am so, so screwed if I can't get Perl 6 working again.
I just upgraded Fedora from 30 to 31.
I upgraded to rakudo-pkg-Fedora31-2019.07.1-03.x86_64.rpm
from https://github.com/nxadm/rakudo-pkg/releases
Now P6 can not find my subs inside my modules:
# cat p6lib/ModuleTest.pm6
sub ModuleTest() is export( :ModuleTest ) { say "Hi"; }
sub ModuleTst() is export( :ModuleTst ) { say "Bye"; }
# perl6 -I./p6lib -e 'use ModuleTest :ModuleTest :ModuleTst; ModuleTest;
ModuleTst;'
===SORRY!=== Error while compiling -e
Undeclared name:
ModuleTst used at line 1
The stock "rakudo" and "rakudo-zef" that resides in the
Fedora repo's has the same issue.
And I just reproduced it on a fresh virtual machine of
Fedora 31 that had never before been touched by Perl 6
(Rakudo)
This problem now occurs across all my programs that call
any of my custom modules. This did to happen in Fedora 30.
Many thanks,
-T
4 years, 5 months
'updates-testing' failed ??
by ToddAndMargo
Hi All,
Is this me or them?
Does "fedora-updates-testing-modular.repo" supersede
"fedora-updates-testing.repo"?
Many thanks,
-T
# dnf --enablerepo=* update
...
Fedora 31 - x86_64 - Test Updates 7.2 kB/s | 3.4 kB 00:00
Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-testing'
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-testing'
# ls /etc/yum.repos.d
brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_.repo
fedora-cisco-openh264.repo
fedora-modular.repo
fedora.repo
fedora-updates-modular.repo
fedora-updates.repo
fedora-updates-testing-modular.repo
fedora-updates-testing.repo
metasploit-framework.repo
pgdg-fedora-all.repo
rpmfusion-free.repo
rpmfusion-free-updates.repo
rpmfusion-free-updates-testing.repo
rpmfusion-nonfree.repo
rpmfusion-nonfree-updates.repo
rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing.repo
4 years, 5 months
Re: (fedora) Re: Failed to create a dual boot F31 windows 10 on Dell E5540
by Jouk Jansen
samuel(a)sieb.net wrote on 31-OCT-2019 22:45:56.20
>On 10/31/19 3:27 AM, Jouk Jansen wrote:
>> I tried to make from my Dell lattitude E5540 running windows 10 a dual boot
>> with F31. Intallation of F31 runned as expected apart form one point: I made
>> a custom partion layout of the free space and it compalined that my BIOS
>> needed a small biosboot partition (so I also created that one).
>It appears that you booted the USB drive using CSM (legacy) mode instead
>of EFI. The biosboot requirement confirms that.
>> However after the installation the machine was unbootable. I had to chande
>> the boot mode in the bios form UEFI to legacy to get F31 booted. Windows 10
>> appeared not bootable anymore.
>>
>> What did I miss? How should I proceed to get a dual boot machine?
>You will need to reinstall again, but make sure you boot in EFI mode.
>You should be able to set your BIOS to only boot in EFI with no CSM
>available if necessary. You can remove that biosboot partition during
>the install as well.
Thanks that helped. CSM was called a little different in the BIOS but
switching off all "legacy" capabilities did the trick.
Still wondereing why Fedora installs in legacy mode while the DVD is booted
in EFI mode and a windown EFI boot manager is present, resulting in wiping
out the windows bootmanager.
Regards
Jouk
Pax, vel iniusta, utilior est quam iustissimum bellum.
(free after Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 b.Chr.-46 b.Chr.)
Epistularum ad Atticum 7.1.4.3)
Touch not the cat bot a glove
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<
Jouk Jansen
joukj(a)hrem.nano.tudelft.nl
Technische Universiteit Delft tttttttttt uu uu ddddddd
Kavli Institute of Nanoscience tttttttttt uu uu dd dd
Nationaal centrum voor HREM tt uu uu dd dd
Lorentzweg 1 tt uu uu dd dd
2628 CJ Delft tt uu uu dd dd
Nederland tt uu uu dd dd
tel. 31-15-2782272 tt uuuuuuu ddddddd
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<
4 years, 5 months
