On 07/06/2014 03:53 AM, lee wrote:
Glenn Holmer <shadowm(a)lyonlabs.org> writes:
> On 07/05/2014 06:21 PM, Tim wrote:
>> Allegedly, on or about 05 July 2014, Patrick O'Callaghan sent:
>> The old system was considered bad, because it had 6 run levels, of which
>> a few of them were never used. Now we have 12?
>
> Twelve different types of *units*, of which service and target are two.
> A target is like a runlevel (it groups units together), except that more
Then systemd is broken by design. A shepherd is *not* a type of sheep.
systemd is broken because you don't like the terms it uses? Really?
"Target" makes perfect sense: to reach a certain target, enable the
units in its list.
And why would so many types of units be needed?
http://www.lyonlabs.org/just-rtfm.jpg
--
Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
"After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."