It should be noted that smartd will not work on scsi drives that are
part of a hardware raid array. Those device are masked by the raid
controller and accessed very differently.
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:34:38 -0400 (EDT), Tom Diehl <tdiehl(a)rogueind.com> wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Randy Kelsoe wrote:
> Tom Diehl wrote:
>
> >>Mine fails as well. I don't have any IDE disks in my machine. I have 2
> >>SATA drives and 1 IDE dvd-rom and 1 IDE dvd-ram drive. Would I be okay
> >>disabling this service as well?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Bottom line is you do not need smartd. Having said that, if your devices
support
> >it, IMO you should run it. If properly setup (and enabled in the BIOS) it can
> >give you warnings of impending disk failure. There are numerous links available
> >via google that will explain this better than I can. Try googleing for smartd.
> >
> >
>
> Actually, smart does not need to be enabled in BIOS. If it is enabled in
> BIOS, the BIOS will check the smart status of the drive on boot up, and
> if it finds a problem, it may disable or ignore the drive. smartd will
> still work if smart is disabled in BIOS.
Yes, you are correct. I found this info about 5 minutes after I sent the above.
>
> >Smartd will for sure monitor smart enabled SCSI disks. I do not know about
> >SATA but since this is a new technology my guess would be that it will monitor
> >them as well. IIRC, there was also a series of articles in Linux Journal a few
> >months back on this.
> >
>
> If the drive is on a SATA controller that is using libata, smart will
> not work (yet). If the drive is using IDE mode, and the drive is
> supported, it should work.
>
>
http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/#testinghelp
Tom
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list