On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:47:04 -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
Maybe we need a new "packagers(a)lists.fedoraproject.org" for
this sort of
thing.
We don't need even more lists:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
There are too many already.
There are too many with "no description available", too.
This one is scary:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/relicensing
No description and only spam since Oct 2011.
There is packaging@ list, but it's more about packaging techniques
and packaging guidelines rather than the review process or its problems.
There's some overlap with devel@ list, too.
More lists usually means that subscribers, who could help, are harder
to find, because they are not subscribed everywhere.
There are enough off-topic threads on this list, so a bit more tolerance
for this tiny thread would be appreciated. Afterall, it has been opened
by a _user_, who is looking into becoming a packager. I know that there
are users with the same interest, but they are just too shy to even try
submitting a package for review.