On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 22:49:56 +0800
Ed Greshko <ed.greshko(a)greshko.com> wrote:
On 8/22/19 2:49 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:51 AM Ed Greshko <ed.greshko(a)greshko.com
> <mailto:ed.greshko@greshko.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Just an idea.
>
> Is there a difference in the output of "lsmod" when run on the
> 5.2 v.s. 5.1 kernel?
>
>
> If both with kernel 5.2.9 and 5.1.20 I execute "lsmod | sort" and
> then a diff of the output produced I get:
>
>
Sadly, the resulting reformatting of email made the output
incomprehensible to me.
What I was hoping to determine was if some module was loaded in the
working case but not the failing case.
At this point I'd go with Samuel's advice and file a bug report
upstream.
I noticed that the working version had module ecc, and the non-working
version doesn't.
Also, the working version had intel_ishtp_loader, and the non-working
version doesn't.
And the working version had typec_displayport, and the non-working
version doesn't.
Those seem like they might be pertinent to your problem. I can't say
*why* they are missing. Are they obsolete? Are they folded into other
modules? Has fedora changed its kernel parameters to stop building
them? Asking in a ticket is probably the best way to get some answers.