On 06/23/16 07:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 06/22/2016 04:27 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 06/22/2016 04:18 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> >> I thought the presets were only used on a install of a package. If
>> >> they are used on
>> >> upgrades/updates then wouldn't every update/upgrade result in
services
>> >> being reset to
>> >> their preset?
IIRC, the presets are invoked by the post-install scriptlet in each RPM
via a "systemctl preset" command, so it'd be invoked many times.
That's fine. But I don't know what is being concluded. I don't think
you saying that
you'd consider it normal that an upgrade of a package reverts the service status to
the
"vendor presets"?
Meaning, if a service's vendor present is "disabled" and I've
specifically "enabled" it
should not be OK that my choice is being overridden after an update/upgrade regardless of
what is in the preset file. It would seem like an awful mess to me and I've never had
to
do any "cleanup" of this sort after updates/upgrades.
--
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto