On 08/27/2012 10:51 AM, sean darcy uttered this comment:
On 08/27/2012 01:40 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 08/27/2012 10:35 AM, sean darcy uttered this comment:
>> On 08/27/2012 11:03 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
>>> On 27.08.2012, sean darcy wrote:
>>>
>>>> ata_id[273]: unable to open '$devnode'
>>>> ata_id[275]: unable to open '$devnode'
>>>> dracut unable to process initqueue
>>>> dracut warning: /dev/disk/by-uuid/89af.... does not exist
>>>
>>> Looks like this bug:
>>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=827997
>>>
>>> You could try to force-install a new fresh kernel (rpm -Uvh --force
>>> kernel.rpm) and recreating grub.cfg afterwards. Seems to be a problem
>>> with one of the Fedora kernels.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Finally got it to boot. Used /dev/sda2 instead of UUID. BTW, using
>> root=LABEL gives same devnode error.
>>
>> I'll try to force-install kernel.rpm. But which kernel? Does it matter?
>> The most recent F17 kernel on koji is 3.5.2-3, which is that same kernel
>> now installed!
>
> IIRC, if you specify "LABEL=" and "UUID=", the device must match
both
> (it's a logical AND). You said that the UUID was correct, so odds are
> the label isn't correct. Check via "e2label /dev/sda2".
>
> My $0.02: choose either "LABEL=" or "UUID=", but not both. Or
skip it
> all and use the device. Chances are that the UUID will be more unique
> so I'd use that.
I may have been confusing - I used LABEL _instead of_ UUID. The label
came from blkid. I think LABEL is subject to the same bug as UUID.
I misread your post. I thought your grub2 stanza had both specified, but
it was the output of your blkid command. Sorry. I have to be more
careful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks(a)alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 22643734 Yahoo: origrps2 -
- -
- "Hello. My PID is Inigo Montoya. You `kill -9'-ed my parent -
- process. Prepare to vi." -
----------------------------------------------------------------------