On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 10:07 -0800, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
Device: uri = usb://Brother/HL-1440%20series
class = direct
info = Brother HL-1440 series
make-and-model = Brother HL-1440 series
device-id = MFG:Brother;CMD:PCL4,PJL;MDL:HL-1440
series;CLS:PRINTER;
location =
Well, everything seems to be in order, so I'm not sure what went wrong.
Here is the list of drivers for that ID, most preferred first:
$ /usr/share/system-config-printer/check-device-ids.py 'Brother HL-1440
series' 'MFG:Brother;CMD:PCL4,PJL;MDL:HL-1440 series;CLS:PRINTER;'
Installing relevant drivers using session service
Fetching driver list
└── Brother HL-1440 series (user-specified): MFG:Brother;MDL:HL-1440
series;CMD:PCL4,PJL;
├── foomatic:Brother-HL-1440-hl1250.ppd [foomatic]
├── gutenprint.5.2://brother-hl-1440/simple [gutenprint-cups]
├── gutenprint.5.2://brother-hl-1440/expert [gutenprint-cups]
├── foomatic:Brother-HL-1440-hpijs-pcl5e.ppd [foomatic]
├── foomatic:Brother-HL-1440-lj4dith.ppd [foomatic]
└── foomatic:Brother-HL-1440-ljet4.ppd [foomatic]
Of course, by all means report a bug about the gutenprint behaviour. I
just wanted to try to find out why that driver was being used instead of
hl1250.
Tim.
*/