On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 20:23:52 +0200
Timothy Murphy <gayleard(a)alice.it> wrote:
On Saturday, July 05, 2014 12:12:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Additionally, since about f17, '.service' is assumed...
>
> ie,
>
> systemctl status foobar
>
> is the same as
>
> sysemctl status foobar.service
Again, many thanks - tested and verified.
Now the only thing I can moan about is the lack of
chkconfig --list
Not exactly the same, but I like:
systemctl list-unit-files
you can grep that output for enabled/disabled/etc.
kevin