Albert Graham wrote:
I'm sorry that you don't understand my response,
Did you expect anyone to understand that your installations weren't typical?
but I did actually take
the time to visit the reference website you posted that "slated" the
Fedora a distribution, It was clear to me that, that guy does not have a
clue and is getting what he deserves, surely you understand that you
should not be taking his advice - that would be a case of the blind
leading the blind.
I didn't make the initial post with the reference. My comment was that
his seemed like a typical experience.
>>
>> The only real issue is a stable kernel for your requirements,
>> everything else is less important, also I have a habit of running
>> everything in user-space so it's a lot easier to virtualize or switch
>> out the underlying OS if required.
>
> How do you virtualize "everything"? You have to have a real kernel
> and device drivers somewhere. If that isn't an up-to-date fedora then
> you are talking about something very different than it seems here.
And I'd still like to understand this part. Do you only recommend
fedora for people who can virtualize it?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell(a)gmail.com