Am 25.02.2013 22:21, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
Hi
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net
<mailto:h.reindl@thelounge.net>> wrote:
Am 25.02.2013 22 <tel:25.02.2013%2022>:09, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
>
> I am not sure why the stock quote is consider a useful argument here.
Distributions are already adopting this.
and why "they" are not adopting /etc/sysconfig?
and political reasons (why should we adopt a Red Hat or SUSE decision etc). For
distributions using systemd
who needs political reasons in software-development?
things are fine and working or not
yes, so easy the world could be
it would be easy to drive with sytemd the Radhat way and let other
distributions decide if they use sysVinit forever or follow this way