Rahul Sundaram <metherid(a)gmail.com> writes:
Hi
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:19 AM, lee wrote:
> The bug --- or call it misstatement if you like --- is with systemd in
> that things can still be started even when they are disabled.
>
Err. no. Before systemd, the equivalent of mask simply didn't exist and
there was no systematic way to disable dynamically started services. So in
sysvinit, if a service is D-Bus activated, you had no good way to control
that. systemd for the first time harmonized that process.
That is irrelevant. I don't know what you don't understand ---
"disabled" means disabled, i. e. cannot be started. Systemd is buggy
because when you disable a service, the service can still be started.
That means that the service is not disabled.
Besides, dbus shouldn't start any services, that would be insane.
--
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)